Joint Commission's Goals And Guiding Principles

The Joint Commission is an independent, not-for-profit group in the United States that administers voluntary accreditation programs for hospitals and other healthcare organizations (for example, long term care, mental health, and ambulatory care). The commission develops performance standards that address crucial elements of operation, such as patient care, medication safety, and infection control and consumer rights. Patient safety is one of the main focus of the Joint Commission. They make sure their standards provide the best service by helping health care organizations to improve the quality and safety of the care they provide.

Last week I found the information that I gathered from the assignment on conducting a visit to a local healthcare facility to hold the most interesting concepts from me. Having worked for different healthcare facilities, I have had my share of Joint Commission visits. It is not at all a visit that hospital employees look forward to. Learning about the details behind what the surveyors intend to achieve by examining hospital practices, questioning employees and asking patients about their stay makes more sense now.

Thank you for your all information. Your answer is very organized and well addressed the question. I agreed with you the Joint Commission's mission and goal now is to focus on continuously improving health care for the public by evaluating health care organizations and inspiring them to excel in providing the safest and effective care of the highest quality and value. According to the Joint Commision (JC), there are no new National Patient Safety Goals in 2015, but JC continuously determines the highest priority patient safety issues and how best to address them. For exxample, for hospital setting, the goals focus on following problems: identify patients correctly, improve staff communication, use alarms safely, prevent infection, identify

Their mission is “to continuously improve health care for the public, in collaboration with other stakeholders, by evaluating health care organizations and inspiring them to excel in providing safe and effective care of the highest quality and value”, (Joint Commission, 2014). The accreditation from the Joint Commission can be earned by multiple health care organizations including critical access hospitals, office based surgery centers, behavioral health care facilities, and home care services. For a hospital setting, the Joint Commission places the performance measures into accountability and non-accountability measures. They look at research and if the facility is performing evidence-based care process which improves health outcomes, proximity which the care process is linked to the patient outcomes, accuracy for whether or not the care process has indeed been provided, and any adverse effects. To earn and maintain The Joint Commission’s Gold Seal of Approval™, an organization must undergo an on-site survey by a Joint Commission survey team at least every three years (Joint Commission,

The Joint Commission is involved in making sure the health care facilities are providing the patient and family members of patients the effective and safe care that the patient needs and deserves. There is a close relationship between the National Patient Safety Goals (NPSG) and the results of the Joint Commission survey. If the facility were following the NPSG’s then the facility would have more of likelihood that the organization will receive a good survey results from the Joint Commission. There are serious consequences for the health care organization if the organization does not meet the benchmarks set by the Joint Commission. Multiple tools out there will aid this author in determining if the organization that this author works in is

Hence, this is a sentimental event because this unanticipated event resulted in death to a patient, not related to the natural source of the patient's illness. Therefore, the threat and error management model should be used to determine both training needs and organizational strategies to improve the management of threats to safety. What defenses in the system failed in this case? Can you construct a Swiss cheese analysis of the system defenses and what occurred?

7 / D.P7: Explain how different procedures maintain health and safety in a selected health or social care setting Maintaining health and safety in health and social care is extremely important to ensure the health, safety and wellbeing of all their service users as well as other individuals service providers may come in contact with in the setting. There are several procedures that help to maintain this health and safety however they can all vary between settings for example, health and safety procedures will be slightly different and more focused on certain areas in hospitals and especially in paediatric ward compared to in drop-in centres where the needs and risk to service users are slightly different. Some of the procedures used in health and social care to maintain health and safety include; infection control and prevention, safe moving and handling of equipment and individuals, food preparation and storage, storage and administration of medication and storage and disposal of hazardous substances.

There is much overlap when discussing quality and safety in nursing, but it is important to realize that both have their own skills and knowledge essential to the competency. Quality is measuring the rendering of a specific process or action and comparing the data to benchmarks. If the standards are not met then quality improvements are implemented in the hopes of meeting those standards. Were safety is the proactive action of preventing mistakes from occurring, such as knowing a patient is at risk for following and taking precautions such as assisting the patient during ambulation’s. Safety is looking at the environment around you for potential areas of hazard and using critical thinking to make changes for the better of you, co-workers, and patients (Sherwood,

I always remind my interdisciplinary team that incident reporting is a virtual every nurse should admire. In our team, we always start the day by discussing our previous day achievements and shortcomings. These shortcomings includes anything that compromises quality of care and patient safety. The philosophy we have adopted is that shortcomings are expected, but undesired and unintentional outcomes. We always strive to identify and analyze factors influence the concurrence of the shortcoming.

Failing in service-user safety can sometimes be attributed to communication failure, however communication is one of the most important tools in preventing such failures. The ability to communicate effectively as a team stems from understanding the various professions in the team (Gluyas & Morrison, 2013). Understanding the various roles allows for an insight into how the healthcare system links together and the part each roles plays in provision of care. Additionally it aides in building trust and respect amongst team members (Gluyas & Morrison, 2013). This in turn can be linked to improved service-user safety, because it allows for role relation and see their part in the service-user care pathway.

Differentiating Roles and Main Activities of CMS and Joint Commission Centers for Medicare Medicaid Services (CMS) is affiliated to the Department of Health and Human Services which oversees federal programs. CMS aims at achieving better quality health care system, reduction of costs and improving health. CMS`s roles and main activities are to administer programs like Medicare and work with States to provide Medicaid. Also provides Children health insurance portability (CHIP), oversees Health Standards and Quality Bureau (HSQB) which “develops, interprets and implements health quality and safety standards and evaluates their impact on the utilization, quality, and cost of health care services”, (Social Security,2015, p.1).,and

The concern for safety has become a bigger and more important issue, and these two departments are forming a relationship. Although it has been the tradition for these two departments to work separately, they both have a common goal, to oversee the safety and excellence in healthcare organizations. Some smaller organizations have always had the same person control quality and risk and remained successful. These days, we are seeing a lot more collaborations, goal sharing, ad idea exchanging among these two groups (Perry, 2007). Risk management is critical to every organization.

The primary goals of the mock survey are to raise the awareness of nurse managers, educate staff, reduce anxiety, display support and provide for gathering any identified needs. A self-evaluation tool that could prove helpful in decreasing apprehension is called the mock survey which simulates the site visit process and provides standards review similar to the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) parameters. The evaluation for accreditation by JCAHO can induce considerable concern for chief nursing executives and staff. This method of self-evaluation was implemented at the Department of Nursing of Genesee Hospital in Rochester, New York. All interview tools used in the survey were developed using information

Self-Regulation and the New Registered Nurse Introduction self-regulation is Understanding self-regulation is an important In this paper, self-regulation in relation to nursing practice and quality assurance will be explored. Self-regulation of RN Practice As with many other professions, registered nursing is a self-regulated profession. The purpose of regulation is to ensure that professionals practice in a safe, competent and ethical manner (CNO, 2014, pp. 3).

Risk Based Monitoring (RBM) is becoming more popular and widely used in clinical trials in the past few years. The concept of the risk based monitoring is to transform the traditional 100 % source data verification (SDV) monitoring approach towards a new concept of monitoring that includes varies of centralised activities in critical data evaluation and process monitoring. RBM is a monitoring approach which combines risk assessment and risk management by utilising key data indicators, along with analytical tools to identify risk at study level, site level and subject level respectively. It also introduces the new term Source Data Review (SDR) to the industry. Source Data Verification which is known as SDV is defined as “the process by which