Space Exploration Argumentative Essay

In the article, “Should We Cut NASA Funding?” written by Keith Yost, he answers the questions that have been the topic of debate for over 20 years. He states that it is predicted that in the Florida conference, President Obama will talk about the reductions that will be made to NASA’s budget. In his article, Yost takes a clear position on the

In the article, “Should We Cut NASA Funding?” written by Keith Yost, he answers the questions that have been the topic of debate for over 20 years. He states that it is predicted that in the Florida conference, President Obama will talk about the reductions that will be made to NASA’s budget. In his article, Yost takes a clear position on the

Thus far NASA had primarily focused on taking baby steps to achieve what they had. While these achievement seem like incredible strides in our eyes, the amount of what remains in the universe to discover is limitless. Although in an ideal world we would have the resources necessary to continue growing at the same rate as during the Space Race, the current high costs of technology had created a roadblock in space travel. Roger D. Launius claims that NASA’s large and ambitious programs failed due to technological challenges and budgetary pressures. Therefore, the question arises; do the benefits outweigh the costs?

A small amount of investment in NASA’s research activities can raise the national revenue. Also, by funding NASA we strive to make new discoveries that could change the whole outlook of the world.

Some people think the moon landings are real, some think that they were faked, no one really knows for sure. Today, I am going to prove that the moon landings were faked/staged by stating my opinion, facts, and evidence. In the end to hopefully persuade you to think that the moon landings were faked.

Dukes 1 A 'marie S. Dukes October 11, 2017 English I PAP/A1 Hern Annotated Bibliography Hanbury,Robin,and Piers Bizony. “For and Against: Space Exploration.” Engineering and Technology Magazine. The Institution of Engineering and Technology, 2014. Web.

Space has helped hone the skills of scientist. By using satellite technology for space, they were able to use the same concept for Earth. Even with all the benefits of space, its major down falls are cost, risks, and low chances of reward for their efforts. Many space explorations cost fortunes with little to come out of it, making it almost seem not worth it. The risk is another key factor, with little known about the majority of space, many outliers can appear out of nowhere and can cause death to anyone that happens to be working up there.

It is within our best interest as humans to continue to support the space programs. NASA has several space programs that have contributed significantly to scientific research, technological advancements, and our understanding of the universe. There are three major , and these are the ‘real’ human reasons, the fact that NASA significantly benefits the U.S economy, and the fact that space exploration contributes to politics. I have further explained these reasons deeper in this essay. Before reading my provided argument, it is important to know some background on these space programs.

Scientist tell us there is a hole in the ozone layer, however, we can’t see that, yet many people believe it. Let’s consider another example, cancer, known to kill millions every year, yet science is still unsuccessful in finding a cure, but it does not mean one is not out there. There are many other

Yes, Pluto is a planet in our Solar System. When you’re included in a family with eight other siblings, no matter what shape, size or color, you should never leave it. According to USA today, Harvard science historian Owen Gingerich, who in charge of International Astronomical Union (IAU) planet definition committee, argued at a forum that "a planet is a culturally defined word that changes over time," and that Pluto is a planet.

Instead of funding for movement to another planet, the world should be funding the protection of Earth. WWF, World Wide Fund for Nature, does exactly that. Funding for outer space could lead us to settle on another planet. Without knowledge of how to protect planets and how to actively fix the harm we created on the Earth, humanity should not settle on another planet. Instead, funding for WWF could lead their missions of organizing work around six key areas: forests, marine, freshwater, wildlife, food and climate.

Hopefully NASA will soon figure out a safe way to send Astronauts to Mars with the ability to sustain themselves with very little help from off planet sources. There are many reasons that humans cannot simply live on Mars. Just a few reasons are food, air, water, gravity, radiation, and weather. Even though there are all of these problems NASA says that they are close to solving all of these problems which is why Jennifer L. Holm has written two articles about living on Mars. Mrs. Holm draws on scientific information for her article “Follow the Water” which is a story about living on mars.

The story of the human race is one of humble beginnings. From caves, to space stations orbiting Earth, many questions were asked and many discoveries were made. But what drove these great minds and what lead to the discoveries that would change the course of our species’ history? It was the thirst for knowledge of the universe around them, a thirst that could only be quenched by science. Science cured polio in the 50’s and flew us to the moon in the late 60’s.

Since there are so many theories, scientists are greatly divided on what theory or theories can be proven. However, technological and scientific advancements could lead to proving or eliminating theories. New technology can lead to more accurate

What would it take to continue our planetary exploration agenda? The values behind the space exploration program in the United States is undermined due to the funding required to maintain the program. The cause of this relates to the poor budgeting for the programs, work migrating from a public agency to private agencies, and finally declining enthusiasm in students becoming future researchers. A unique solution to address this concern would be to explore how our funds are being divided up between the areas of education and the aerospace to better manage them. Understanding these issues will allow us to preserve our drive in both the present and future in planetary exploration.