In life there are people who follow instinct and people who follow reason, but which one is more important in mankind? The short story “The Most Dangerous Game” is an exemplified example of this question. In the short story the reasonable and logical Rainsford goes against the instinctive Zaroff. When Rainsford lands on an island, he meets a fellow hunter named Zaroff. He later find out Zaroff hunts humans! Thankfully Rainsford’s reasoning comes comes out victorious when he slays Zaroff in the end. In the short story “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell the author uses diction, characterization and figurative language to demonstrate that reason is stronger and more effective in mankind. Connell uses diction, specific word choice, in order to portray how reason is ideal for mankind. Zaroff states here that,’”Instinct is no match for reason.”(Connell 7). The author’s choice to use the words “no match for” portrays how reason is not even comparable to instinct. The words “no match for” are implying that reason is the winning side. In other words, reason is stronger and more powerful than instinct. The diction used in the statement proved reason was stronger, but diction is not the only stylistic device that …show more content…
The author explained that, “‘I want the ideal animal to hunt’ explained the general ‘So I said, ‘What are the attributes of an ideal quarry?’ And the answer was, of course, ‘ It must have courage, cunning, and, above all, it must be able to reason.”’ (Connell 7). The use of the word “ideal” states how the animal must be of the highest kind. It then says the animal must be able to reason, which demonstrates how reasoning animals are the superior animals. This characterization of reasoning animals conveys how reason is an attribute of a stronger being. Connell uses a third stylistic elements to illustrate reasons
Most Dangerous Game Argumentation Paragraph The story, “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell is about Sanger Rainsford ends up on an island with General Zaroff, who hunts humans. Rainsford ends up playing General Zaroff’s game and becomes the huntee while Zaroff is the hunter. Zaroff loses the game and gets killed by Rainsford.
He begins by stating that humans are “‘most highly evolved”’ and above the “‘lower’ animals [such] as the sponge, the barnacle, or that odd group of faceless geometrical sea creatures”. The ‘geometrical sea creatures’ are not even given a name, because they are not worthy of one like humans are. This pushes Quammen’s idea that humans incorrectly feel superior to animals because they don't show the same evolutionary signs that are in most homo-sapiens. He puts quotes between ‘most highly evolved’ because he disagrees with the biologist’s notion and further explains the hierarchy of evolution with people at the top and animals below with quotations because he disagrees. He states “we know enough to come in out of the rain, usually”, his use of the word ‘usually’ insinuates that although humans have higher cognitive functions, we don’t always act that way.
“Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell uses both internal conflict (character vs. self) and external conflicts, including character vs. character and character vs. nature, the author uses all of these conflicts consequently it makes the reader tense. This story uses ordinary plot structure: exposition comes 1st, then rising action, climax, falling action, and resolution. Richard Connell wrote the story this way so that the readers meet the character first, then get slowly excited until it goes to the climax. This story’s exposition happens when Rainsford gets introduced when he and Whitney talk in the ship. Rising action takes place when Rainsford falls from the boat.
Rainsford is initially shown to not show any empathy to the wild animals he hunts. Zaroff is no different, with him declaring, “I hunt the scum of the earth: sailors from tramp ships--lassars, blacks, Chinese, whites, mongrels,” (9). Zaroff hunts humans who have the unfortunate luck to arrive on Ship-Trap Island. Zaroff gives no second thought about hunting humans because he finds them to be the perfect sport to hunt, and finds pleasure in hunting them. In the short story, “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, the protagonist, Sanger Rainsford, and the antagonist, General Zaroff, are similar characters.
Main characters of films and short stories are evolving tremendously, from their actions to their character traits. In the thriller short story “All the Kings Horses” by Kurt Vonnegut, the main character portrays himself as an excellent and intelligent individual. Reason being in the short story Kelly was placed in a really bad situation. However because of specific reasons; his actions, determination, and sacrifices he was able to get the result he wanted while being under so much pressure. Colonel Bryan Kelly, father of two and husband to one, had to play a life or death game of chess.
The Rise and Fall of Hugh Glass in The Revenant In The Revenant, the climax is the bear attack scene where Hugh Glass is nearly mauled to death by a bear. Before that, he is part of a crew of frontiersman that is exploring America and, one day, his crew is ambushed by Native-Americans. Luckily, Glass and a small group of men escaped the massacre. Glass takes control of his group and with little resources, he sets out on a hunt near where their crew pitched their camp.
Everyone has to overcome adversity in their life. In Richard Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game” the main character, Rainsford, fell of his boat at night time On the Island, Rainsford finds a home where General Zaroff lives. The problem is that the only way he can leave the island is if he survives a “game”. Where General Zaroff is hunting him. So Rainsford has to survive for three days.
Conflict is very important to a story it makes it interesting, some stories have one conflict some have more than one. A great example of multiple conflicts in a story is in “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell man versus man is the most relevant conflict. Man versus nature is the first conflict seen in the story. Man versus himself is a conflict between Rainsford, the story's protagonist, and himself throughout the short story. In “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, there is man versus man, man versus nature and man versus himself.
In Greg Peterson’s, view, a renowned environmentalist "Our downfall as a species is that we are arrogant enough to think that we can control Mother Nature and stupid enough to think it is our job.” But we as humans ignore that fact, we ignored it for centuries and we still do. In Tangerine, we see that that idea is perfectly woven into the story. In Tangerine, most people are not affluent and the land there had gone through many stages of development that worsens the rift between man and nature but yet they have an uneasy balance with nature. One that may not last.
"‘But no animal can reason’ objected Rainsford. ‘My dear fellow,’ said the general, ‘there is one that can.’ ‘But you can't mean--’ gasped Rainsford”(Connell, Paragraph 106-108) He knows that General Zaroff is about to hunt him. When General Zaroff asks Rainsford to “play the game” he immediately reverts to himself as a soldier in World War One, in the sense that he knows he has to fight even if he doesn’t want to.
Did you know that authors use many different literary devices to tell a story? A literary device is a technique writers use to make their stories unique and interesting. Literary devices like simile, metaphor, suspense, personification, allusion, irony, foreshadowing, and imagery are used in lots of stories. In the short story ¨The Most Dangerous Game”, Richard Connell uses literary devices such as suspense and simile to help the reader gain a clear understanding of the story. In this essay, I will provide two examples of literary devices used throughout Richard Connell’s short story.
The Most Dangerous Game Conflicts All stories have to have a conflict, the short story “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell has three important conflicts. Man against man, man against nature, man against himself are the three main conflicts that take place. For man against man Rainsford and General Zaroff are fighting each other in the hunting ‘game’. For man against nature Rainsford is fighting the sea once he hears the gunshots and is trying to get out of the water.
Fear is not real. It is the product of thoughts you create. Danger is very real, but fear is a choice. In the short story “The Most Dangerous Game” the main character Rainsford is being hunted which creates fear in him. He is scared of dying but overcame his fear by facing the danger of the hunting game.
He notes that the inferior animals seem to revel in a more contented fortune than people (Berger, 2004). This argument is agreeable in that animals live a better life than human beings. The truth that animals have no recollections from their previous activities and do not reiterate them means that they, of course, live a better life than men. For example, when considering a housefly that has a lifetime of about seven days according to most biological tests, the animal lives a more comfortable life as compared to human beings. This true because human beings have a longer life span and would suffer more by memorizing previous recollections that inflicted agony and suffering (Jacquette, 2005).
In “The most dangerous game” written by, Richard Connell, he uses many devices such as: characterization, plot structure and theme to contribute to the overall meaning of the story. Characterization is a big part of the overall meaning of the story which is that survival is of those who are smart, cunning, and can adapt to their environment. The protagonist Rainsford is at a constant battle with the antagonist General Zaroff. Throughout the entire short story they both have similar minds sets and then farther along the main character 's mind set develops into something more. The reader can almost sense a self centeredness, and that he believes that there are only two type of people in this world, “the hunters and the huntees”, and he believes that he is the hunter.