College sports are a major part of American culture. College athletes devote hours upon hours a week to their sports training, but unfortunately, sports can take up a lot of time and distract from other important activities. This can harm academics, as athletes have to balance sports and academics, especially at a college. Participating in sports is almost like working a part-time job and having to balance school too which can be difficult to do, and focus may be rendered on one task and not both. Furthermore, athletes will be on scholarships too, which is why college athletes should not be paid. As a start to things, something that may not pop out to most people when lingering on the topic is how each college athlete would have to be paid …show more content…
Research.com has listings under the cons of paying college athletes. One reason paying college athletes would not work is the fact that most college sports fans are almost guaranteed to pick between the sports of men's and women's basketball and football. So with those three sports being the cream of the crop. They draw in the most attention and also the most revenue for the school by being broadcast on television and other things like ticket sales and many other things. So if basketball is for both men and women with the addition of football being the money maker for schools the student-athletes that participate in those sports would be receiving the most amount of money. And for the other sports a school would have to offer would be getting the leftovers from what the ¨Main event¨ sports and the student-athletes …show more content…
So receiving thousands of dollars could lead to many different distractions from academics. Especially if balancing sports and academics is already hard enough. The NCAA states in an interview with The Chicago tribune that college athletes already earn endorsement deals and other contracts, and tend to study less that is not the only reason the NCAA has brought to be against college athletes being paid. In the same Chicago Tribune interview, the NCAA states that if an ¨athlete was being paid and it significantly changed their lifestyle," NCAA President Mark Emmert testified in a previous federal antitrust case, "they probably would not be living in a residence hall. They probably would not be eating in the cafeteria, they probably would not be as — as active a member or participant in the life of a campus." ( quote taken from here. ) This shows a lifestyle change within the student-athlete. Which for the school is not good as they already funded their own money towards the athlete to provide them with a full-ride scholarship toward the
although athletes work tough from day to night time every day they can’t preserve on making a living for something they may be getting to know for or their future dreams, and because of this, college athletes need to now not receives a commission because there need to be equality, or in any other case it will purpose issues with different fields and organizations too. For colleges to be a fair place every class needs to give the same education without making it more valuable, and this is for everyone's future to be better! For our school to not end up in additional costs we should not expect something like this from our universities. Don’t overlook athletes' needs and passion for them to clearly get what they deserve in the long
Paying these athletes would take away what college is supposed to be. College
College sports are a multibillion-dollar industry that brings millions of fans in to watch their favorite teams or athletes play. Collegiate sports have always played a significant role in the U.S., and the debate as to whether college athletes should be paid or not has been ongoing for years. While many people believe that athletes should be paid for their hard work, as well as the significant amount of money they bring into the schools, many people also believe that they should not be paid. Although college athletes work hard, paying college athletes could lead to many negative consequences in the sport such as budget cuts in smaller income sports, athletes only playing for the money, and takes away the difference between amateur and professional athletes. Paying college athletes could lead to budget cuts in other sports or activities that don’t bring in as much money.
"(Nagel) The article also argues that paying college athletes would change the nature of college athletics, as it would shift the focus from education to athletics. "The fact is that college sports are a part of the educational experience and the focus on athletics should never be at the expense of education,"(Nagel) he says. Overall, Nagel suggests that paying college athletes would create more problems than it would solve, and that the current system of scholarships and educational opportunities is the best way to compensate college
Collegiate sports produce a lot of money from the students who play for them. These students only and for that reason College athletes should be paid outside of scholarships because the college sports industry makes a large amount of money, and these athletes invest a lot of time and risk into their sport, along with the fact that if athletes were paid they could afford their education. Athletes should be able to make money from the sport they play because with the amount of hours they put in there isn’t for them to do school work and have a job .Colleges profit about $27 billion dollars or more annually from their athletics (Article name). In the past twelve years the amount of attention and money generated by football and basketball has
Football, basketball, and baseball, in particular, generate billions of dollars a year for colleges in ticket sales, merchandise sales, and advertisements” (Drew 1). Because of how much money is being earned by a school, college athletes could earn some of this money. But, the school might use the money on other things such as campus needs. But, “ensuring that student-athletes are paid may not only alleviate the financial burden that some families face when sending their children to college. It may also encourage college athletes to stay for education before going pro” (Bouchrika 4).
College sports are a significant part of American culture and generate billions of dollars in revenue every year. While universities profit greatly from the work of college athletes, the athletes themselves receive no compensation for their hard work. The question of whether college athletes should be paid has been debated in recent years, with strong arguments on both sides. In this essay, I will argue that college athletes should be paid for their work.
The Argument Against Paying College Athletes The justification of attending college is to acquire professional training and skills, so why should college athletes be compensated? Paying college athletes more than the scholarships they already have is not a good idea. Even though college athletes should be paid because they don't have time to work, they shouldn't be paid because it could send a negative message to kids and high school students and they already got paid through their tuition, fees, and transportation. While it may inspire more children to participate in sports, it may also convey a negative message and misunderstand why they should do so.
Although most schools prioritize academics over sports, Colleges should compensate student-athletes fairly because of everything they provide. For this reason, college sports programs
College athletes put in a lot of time, effort, and work into the sport they’ve played since they were young, but they aren’t getting paid for it. These student athletes deserve to be paid because they put in countless hours of hard work and balance sports with school work. The first reason athletes in college do deserve to be compensated is because they don 't have time to fit in work with a school and athletic schedule. College athletes don’t have time to get a real job. Student athletes have a very busy schedule, they don’t have time to fit in a job.
In today 's life college athletes are not pleased because they don’t get any compensation at all from their sport they are playing. There is a lot of similarities between professionals players and college athletes players like to broadcast of their games, they both can seen on the Tv or media. They both let people know the intense game that the players play, which gives the people a lot of excitement and grabs the people attention to pay for a ticket. Does it affect the college athlete to not get paid at all? Well according to some experts, it does because athletes need that money to pay college tuitions, to buy books, to pay apartment rent, etc.
If colleges began to pay their athletes, then they could build a bad reputation for being mercenary and lose their educational reputation If they are allowed to play, then it can be financially detrimental to the college because there are many flaws in the system. College athletes should not be compensated for their actions regarding athletic activities, no matter what sport or level they compete on. The idea that college athletes should or shouldn 't be paid
College sports is one of the best-known entertainments around the world. But for the athletes, they are students first then athletes second. For college student-athletes, there are a variety of scholarships and grants to help pay for college or college debt. However, some critics say that student-athletes should be paid a salary like pro athletes would, with help from scholarships or grants. The authors of, College Athletes are being Educated, not Exploited, Val Ackerman and Larry Scott, argue that student-athletes are already paid by free education and other necessities.
Focusing on the schooling part more than trying to earn money in college would be much more beneficial for these student-athletes (Should). Of all undergraduate students, athletes receiving some kind of compensation (scholarships, financial aid, etcetera) graduated with a degree 5% of the time more than non-athletes. This shows that without having to worry about any kind of money students are in a better environment to succeed and set themselves up for
Mike says”Students all over the world work hard at the sport that true love and don’t get a lot in return for it”. While college athletes may not exactly be employees, they are more than just students. Consider the life of a student-athlete, though. The average Division I football player dedicates over 43hours per week to his sport, meaning that he spends more than a typical American work-week training and playing football, in addition to his class work. Their work, which generates exorbitant amounts of money year in and year out, deserves Compensation.