The Pros And Cons Of The Government System

The Constitution DBQ The Constitution of United States is regarded by many as an important document, for it gave the common people the power to form a government the way they want. Yet, despite all the benefits that it brought to the American people at the time, people also had some concerns about the Constitution such as: it is creating a Central government that is too powerful, only white men that owns property are allowed to vote, not everyone in the nation are treated equally, etc. When the Constitution was first being drafted, Representatives from each state hoped to add terms that would benefit their own states—this lead to a heated debate on how the Constitution should be formed.

The constitution of the United States is an insightful and revolutionary idea of how a government should be practiced in order to prevent a greedy, corrupt form of government from establishing and taking over its people. The US government is founded on the principle that it works for its people, meaning that whatever is legislated is meant only for the benefit of the American people. However, the Constitution is at this point flawed due to the fact that many of its proclamations are vague and outdated, and has to be left to interpretation as to what the framers truly intended of it. This is dangerous because it further divides the nation when Americans believe in different forms of what is constitutionally righteous, and this may start a civil

Federalists believed the Constitution provided just the right mix of power and limitations. The federalists wanted to make sure the central government either had more or less power. The first government of the US was a one-house legislature with no executive. It couldn't raise money, it relied on the states for military power, and was generally seen as ineffective and weak. The US Constitution was written to remedy those weaknesses and provide the US with a better, more representative form of government.

After the end of the revolutionary war many patriots feared another abusive parliament and because of that they refused to give such power to the new union. Instead the authority remained in the states. After a short time the powerful states and weak national government had many problems. Right after declaring independence in 1776 congress invited the states to create a constitution. Although all states called for republics they had different ideas on where to have more authority.

Because of the strict division between the two types of government, dual federalism is sometimes called layer-cake federalism. Southern states including Texas conflicted with national government because at the time, federalism was trying to involve the touch of civil rights but the southern states wanted to maintain a segregated society because it’s important and necessary for our political and economy. As conservatives made many political inroads during the 1970s, a new concept of federalism, which was kind of an old concept of federalism, became popular. It was called, the New Federalism. Block grants was one of the way to give the state more power by allowing states to decide what to do with federal money.

The United States Constitution has created much debate since the moment it was conscripted. It has been argued that Constitution of the United States is a document that was drafted in response to the evolution of society. Others have argued that the creation of the Constitution was made as an effort to create a strong national government that was capable of exercising real authority and preservation of ideals in the revolution. The American Constitution is seen as being reactionary because the founders of the Constitution wanted to react to change in restoration of the previous state. The U.S. Constitution is considered reactionary because one should consider the events, documents, and people who participated in the era of the Constitution.

Our government is weak and powerless. We’re the laughing stalk of all the nations, but that can all be change with the Constitution. With the Constitution comes a stronger government, more power for you, the people of America, more rights and protection,

Politicians and voters have become so accustomed to the idea that our nation will always be superior because of our bulletproof constitution. The unfortunate truth is that it is far from bulletproof. One man was asked in an article about how he feels about the constitution and he said, “Blind faith in the wisdom of the constitution, and its capacity to withstand the poor behavior of politicians, will eventually destroy it” (Appelbaum). Because of the fact that the constitution sets up safety nets through checks and balances, politicians feel like they can sit back and wait for others to make decisions for them. Overall with the way the government is set up, there's no way it can sustain without serious reform (Lipps).

1. Personally, I believe the constitution was the better document because it had more power. The articles of confederation gave the states more power than congress had, and because of this states either did was it said or did not. Because of the states having more power over Congress, the states did not focus on the needs of the whole country but only cared for their own state and what is best for their people. The constitution is better because it was easier to make changes and amendments to it.

Jeffersonian Democracy impact in politics, which led rivalry between Jefferson and Hamilton. It led argued between formation of political parties of Democracy-Republic and Federalist. Jefferson’s part as Democracy- Republic, which favored economic freedom and agriculture. Whereas, Hamilton Federalist party favored industrializing and wanted federal control. Also, Federalist Party wanted strong central government.

The Government is the ultimate ruler of the people, sets the ultimate laws of the land and says what goes and when not pleased uses all the means in their power to influence. The basic functions of the United States government are listed in the Constitution. Due to the immense power of our federal government, people often argue that it is too powerful and should be lessened. Sub further the state governments use a sum of power to do the same. There has been an effort to shift power from the federal government to the states.

The Constitution was created in response to the inadequacies of the Articles of Confederation. While almost all would agree the Articles were a failure and needed replacing there was much debate on what should replace them. There were two sides to this debate. On one side stood the Federalists who believed that a strong centralized government was necessary to avoid anarchy. On the other side stood the anti-federalists who were concerned about the government becoming too powerful and infringing on the rights of the people.

The United States Government can be described in two ways. There is unified government, which appears when the President and both houses of congress share the same party. Divided government is the opposite, it occurs when one party controls the white house, and another party controls one or more houses of Congress. A unified government should seem to be more productive because enacting laws would be much easier. A bill has to pass through both houses of congress as well as the president before it can be an official law.

I believe the system of government that would work best during a time of war, in America, would be a federal government (federalism). Federalism is when the powers of the government are separated between a central government and several local governments. I believe this would be the best option because the power is left to the federal government, this resulting in decisions being able to be made a lot faster in a time of crisis. Decisions would be made faster, due to the fact that not every person has to vote on what to do and not all 50 states have to gratify. I believe the best system of government that should be used during a time of peace would be a representative government.

Parliamentarism, or a parliamentary government, is defined “as a system of government in which the executive, the government, is chosen by and is responsible to…the legislature.” (Gerring, Thacker and Moreno, 2005, p. 15) With this form of governmental control, many advantages and disadvantages arise, especially when this system is compared to the likes of ‘Presidential systems’ or even that of ‘Semi-presidential systems’. However, my aim within this essay is to, both, highlight to advantages of parliamentarism, and to also give my opinion as to why this system is better when compared and contrasted with the aforementioned systems. According to Hague and Harrop (2007, p. 336), there are three different branches relating to the parliamentary system. Firstly, the legislature and the executive are “originally linked”.