The Innocent Killer discusses the troubling life of Steven Avery, a wrongfully convicted man from Manitowoc county Wisconsin. This book depicts how the criminal justice system can be unfair and shows in what ways it was corrupted.
On July 14, 1985 Penny Beernsten’s life would never be the same. Setting off for her run Penny checked her watch to make sure she would be able to get back before dark, it was 3:00. With Lake Michigan on one side and the deep forest of point beach on the other Penny felt a sense of utter isolation and amazement. Right as her endorphins were rushing, and she was feeling on top of the world Penny passed a disheveled man dressed in a leather jacket, despite the warm temperatures. While picking up the pace and working
…show more content…
Answering 90-95 percent Vogel informed her that she better be 100 percent, since the defense can change even 10% of disbelief into reasonable doubt. Trusting the “good guys” Penny believed that the Sheriff and DA would do the right thing and never try to convict and put someone in jail that was ultimately innocent. Several days later she testified at the Preliminary hearing how the composite sketch, photo array and line up was presented to her and with all of the information she received about Avery from the Sheriff that she was 100% it was Steve Avery that assaulted her.
With testifying behind her around a month later Penny received a call, from the District Attorney’s office, informing her about yet another process with the trial. Prosecutors, especially in a sexual assault case, are to file 30 days from a preliminary hearing a document charging the defendant with the crime. This is known as information if this is not processed the victim has to testify again. Forgetting to file the information Vogel immediately refiled and the trial was
…show more content…
The final result was that it was not Steve Avery’s DNA that was examined from Penny’s nails but whose was it? After 10 long years the Avery case finally got approved for appeal. After fighting to have the case reopened, it was revisited and found that there was no way that Avery had committed the crime. Gregory A. Allan was found guilty and sentenced to prison. Avery and his lawyers went on to try Manitowic County Sherrif Department for the 18 years that he was incarcerated and the mistrial of justice. DNA evidence has come a far way since the exoneration of Steven Avery and if the case was to be tried today there would be a much different
Even when Michael’s new defense team, through the innocence project, found a crime that was eerily similar to the method of murder and subsequent events to the one that Michael was convicted of, the new prosecutor in Williamson County fought hard to keep DNA testing from taking place, even stating that they objected to the testing now because the defense hadn’t requested it before (Morton, 2014). There was further evidence of ineffectiveness in that the coroner who’d changed his estimated time of death between the autopsy and trial, had come under scrutiny for his findings in this case, as well as several others, with claims of gross errors “including one case where he came to the conclusion that a man who’d been stabbed in the back had committed suicide” (Morton, 2014). This was only one of the many injustices that were committed against Michael Morton throughout his trial. In August of 2006, the defense was finally granted permission to perform DNA testing on the items that had been taken from his wife’s body (Morton, 2014). Although this testing did not reveal any information about the guilty party, it did at least give Michael the knowledge that Chris was not sexually violated before or after her death (Morton,
Death of Innocence: The Story of the Hate Crime That Changed America was written by Mamie Till-Mobley, a supporter of equal opportunities for different ethnicities. Christopher Benson, a writer and lawyer, assisted Mamie Till-Mobley as a co-author in her personal biography. Death of Innocence was published in the year 2003 by Random House in New York. This memoir has 290 pages, including seven pages of Christopher Benson’s personal experiences with Mamie Till-Mobley in the afterword. Death of Innocence is categorized as an adult nonfiction book.
Accused Again – Steven Avery Steven Avery was accused of the ruthless murder of Teresa Halbach. She was on the Avery property to take photos of Steven’s van which he wanted to sell. Over the next few hours, she was ‘apparently’ murdered and her body burned. Only a few short days after this, the unreliable Manitowoc Police Department charged Steven Avery with Halbach’s murder. After following and studying the case, I am convinced that Steven is innocent, and has been framed for Halbach’s murder.
People could not believe the justice system could have locked up a man who was innocent. It was almost to his court hearing to get $400,000 back. Then something tragic happened to Mr. Avery. A woman named Theresa Halbach was reported missing, and was last seen at Stevens residence. He was now a suspect for a new crime.
That was proven, but that does not prove how Caylee died or who put Caylee in that trunk of the car. In order to charge someone with murder, you need to know how they killed a person, or at least be able to answer who, what, when, where why and how. None of those questions were answered. They were not able to prove how Caylee died and that was a big factor! The prosecution failed miserably.
Once someone steps in the court room to oversee a trial of this caliber (or any caliber) they must not and will not let the media dictate their perspective of events. Scott Peterson’s jury saw the burden of proof provided by the prosecution and were left with no doubt in their minds by their own deductions he was guilty. The Casey Anthony jury on the other hand took all of the evidence into consideration, but they still were not completely convinced she was capable of the charges being filed against her, leaving them no other decision but to provide a not guilty
Finally, Wayne Williams took the stand and testified, which resulted in very unfavorable attention from the jury (The Atlanta, n.d.). His angry and combative demeanor on the witness stand left jury members with little sympathy (The Atlanta, n.d.). It only took the jury approximately ten hours to deliberate and reach a guilty verdict, however, if the fiber evidence was not presented I do not believe the deliberation would have been so quick and most likely would have resulted in a not guilty
“The court will now be called to order.” Silence fell as newspeople, observers, the jury, the defendant, the accuser, and their lawyers shuffled to their seats. The accuser, Dafnia Maeson, sniffled into a napkin. The defendant, Aza Malakye, shifted in his seat, casting furtive glances at Maeson. Maeson’s lawyer stood.
Also the defendant put up a fight against the denial of allegations which showed less help to the advantage of trying to be greater and not showing harmful effect. The appellate court reversed his conviction and found that the testimony prejudiced defendant because it implicated him as gang member and had the effect of impeachment,
Anisia had been so confident in the case that she hadn't even gotten a material witness, she was solely depending on her facts to win the case. The defense on the other hands had many witnesses but none could prove that Vanessa was guilty, their witnesses seemed to help Anisias side of the argument. Once both sides were done questioning, the jury ordered a recess for the jury to discuss their final verdict. Walking back into the courtroom made Anisia almost nauseous, the buildup seemed to be almost too much for Anisia. “Has the jury reached a verdict?”
It took nine years for the jury to realize Bloodsworth was innocent. This shows our preamble has a flaw if people are sentencing other to jail even though they're innocent, causing the innocent to rot in jail wrongfully.
Richardson alleges they hid evidence of Zains Faked crime lab tests and false trial testimony four years before others uncovered the lie (Messina, Lawrence). This helps back up the information on Richardson’s case.
Both the Scottsboro case and the Tom Robinson case had evidence that proved they were innocent, but they were both proven guilty (Anderson). In To Kill a
It was so impressive to watch the prosecutors and the defense attorney trying to persuade juries. It was just like the court scene I saw in American TV dramas. But since it was not the drama, they had made some mistakes. The prosecutor sounded overly showy and somewhat looked less prudent by using the phrase like ‘oh brother’. Also he had mistaken the dates several times, and wrote March instead of May.
However, in the game where it is the suspect 's word against the witness, it is hard to prove one’s own innocence. The chance of you winning any sort of favor from the neutral party is little, as everyone wants to place a blame on someone, so why not put it on the person everyone suspects.