The Ineffectiveness Of Animal Testing

The essay, 'Animal testing and its gifts to humans' by Frankie L. Trull is filled with untrue facts and incorrect ideas, which I have responded to in this essay. Torturing millions of animals to death just for human: Is this the right thing to do? Frankie L. Trull says in 2014, France and Germany succeed tin regenerating damaged brain areas in mice for the first time.

In conclusion, we rely extremely heavily on animal testing, most of us more than we know. Even over-the-counter medications that we all commonly take, have been created with the help of animal research. We rely on things every day that animal testing has made possible for us; we have loved ones that wouldn’t be here without it. We would all love to see a day where animal testing is no longer needed, but for now we have it to thank for the millions of lives it has saved, and for enabling us to grow and develop our newest

Credibility Step: Much of the information I’m going to share with you today came from the PETA website, the book The Animal Ethics Reader by Susan Armstrong and Richard Botzler, and the article “Animal testing: is it worth it?” by Geoff Watts. II. Body A. (1st main point) The problem of animal experiments has become one of the central ethical dilemmas in the modern society, and some countries have even banned the practice due to its cruelty 1.

So, using animals is really useless because just because a drug is safe for an animal does not mean it will necessarily be accurate and safe for humans. PISC scientist Gilly Stoddard says “it is unconscionable that animals are dying as a result of the failure to update testing guidelines.” (O’Driscoll 8) Animals should not be dying because humans are using them for inaccurate tests.

Animals are being used for personal needs and used against their will so morally this seems wrong. There has been many side effects to testing that have hurt mankind so there are very good reasons to do away with animal testing. Do the pros of animal testing outweigh the cons? I believe they both cancel each other out and no matter what we do there will be a risk for reward. Seeing what animal testing has done for mankind is a major factor in this paper because it has done wonders for us in the medical field, but the cost has been equal and has hurt many.

(Festing &Wilkinson,2007,p.529). Source 4 Intention to oppose animal research (Ronald E.Goldsmith, Ronald A.Clark, and Barbara

However, Robert Garner and Sarah Rose A. Miller who are opponents of animal experimentation claim that it is unacceptable because it causes animals to suffer. Two aspects of the arguments about animal research are about the use of laboratory animals and the idea of using substitution for live animals, and although the authors mostly disagree

Yet, animal’s rights are violated when they are used in research because they are not given a choice (“Save the Animals”)”. 3. Scientists still continue animal experimentation because they believe animals have no dignity and should simply be seen as objects in order to improve the life cycle. III. Inside laboratories, animals suffer too much and are continued to be treated inhumane.

Over 100 million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned, and abused in US labs every year. Animal testing is a cruel and inhumane way to obtain research and knowledge. Animals can be very different from humans leaving researchers with poor test results. Animal experimentation is no longer necessary for research because of the abundance of solutions and alternatives to solve this issue and keep animals away from harm. For years, many people have been trying to control the amount of animal experimentation that's going on in society and its finally starting to pay off.

Many animals lose their life because of the testing used on animals. Animals should not be used for scientific or commercial testing. Animal testing is

Every year millions of innocent animals are killed or severely harmed in animal experimentation. In laboratories all around the world animals are put through torture for research. Many of these tests however, can lead to misleading or even false information, considering how different an animal’s anatomy can be to ours. This in turn puts them through pointless torment.

Since animal testing is cruel, inhumane, and alternative testing methods now exist, we should discontinue animal testing once and for all. For these reasons, animals should not be used in research or to test the safety of human products. To begin with, animal testing is cruel, inhumane and it violates animals’ rights. The USDA reported that in 2016, 71,370 animals suffered pain during experiments while being given no anesthesia at all for relief.

Imagine an enraged animal rights activist charging toward a scientist in a white lab coat, desperate to free the little mice that are being used as test subjects. Although comical, this scene may be quite accurate when describing the passion that animal lovers have when it comes to the touchy subject of animal testing. For centuries, animal testing has been used in the medical research field, however many are now beginning to question whether it is ethical. Millions of animals are killed per year due to animal testing, so is this practice worth banning? Animal testing is a controversial subject, with supporters pointing out the medical advances that have stemmed from animal research and animal rights activists declaring it cruel and immoral.

In the data as shown above, animal testing should be banned. Animal testing can lead to the death of the animal. Also animal testing is inhumane because of the treatment, and living conditions. Although, animal testing can lead to advancements in the medical field it has failed more than succeeding. Imagine being the animal trapped in that cage, make them change and ban animal testing.

It is true that animal testing requires a lot of investment. Not only that money is spent on advanced technologies, it is also spent to pay for scientists’ expertise on this particular field. In order for the scientists to do their research, they need suitable equipment and substances. Every year, the National institutes of Health finances between $12 billion to $14.5 billion on animal testing as indicated in a study done by the government (Bastach, 2013). Besides, scientists need to consider the fact that animals need to be sheltered, fed and cared for to keep them alive.