Frankie L Trull Animal Testing Rhetorical Analysis

Every year several million animals die due to animal testing in for medical, psychological, and products research. Moreover, animal testing is something that shouldn’t be continued and for it is completely wrong and cruel. Animal testing started in the late 300’s BC. Aristotle and Erasistratus performed many experiments that involved living animals. Similarly, Galen, a greek physician, conducted animals research to explore the field of anatomy, physiology, and pharmacology.

Credibility Step: Much of the information I’m going to share with you today came from the PETA website, the book The Animal Ethics Reader by Susan Armstrong and Richard Botzler, and the article “Animal testing: is it worth it?” by Geoff Watts. II. Body A. (1st main point) The problem of animal experiments has become one of the central ethical dilemmas in the modern society, and some countries have even banned the practice due to its cruelty 1.

For decades humans have tested on helpless animals with cosmetics, medicines and other medical supplies such as bandages, cleaning products, candy, and even office supplies. Animal experimentation is a cruel and inhumane act upon creatures who are believed to be fearless and painless. But, on the contrary, others believe that animal testing has become a groundbreaking way of research for numerous diseases. Although many have mixed feelings about animal testing, it is something that we must address and take seriously, realizing that it is a horrible act upon innocent animals.

Seventy-three percent of animals every year are being put down due to animal cruelty. This percentage is proof of how much animal experimentation has increased in the last 15 years. This is because of the terrible care that animals are being put through, people debate about whether animal testing should happen at all. Some people believe though that animal testing is quite useful in many ways. The people that see animal testing as being useful, think that without animals, medicine and the military would not be where they are today.

Those in favor of testing argue that animal testing increases the longevity of humanity and is a pioneer for medical research. Opponents propose safer alternative solutions, and reveal the inhumane aspects of animal testing. But, which side has a more persuasive argument? A student Shany Sun from Lynbrook High, discusses in her article, “The truth behind animal testing,” the overall benefits associated with

Animal testing throughout history has not only provided vaccines for millions of people but has also increased the longevity of human life. “An increase of thirty years has been added to the lifespans of Americans due to the creation of vaccines” (Vaccines.gov). “Since the 1920s, the life expectancy of humans in the United States has increased from sixty-five to eighty-five in the 2000s” (Living Longer). These statistics are irrefutable as animal testing has played a vital role in extending human life. Animal experiments have not only impacted the history of human beings but are currently still providing many advancements in medicine.

Animal Experimentation Animal experimentation has been practiced for centuries. Humans have always used other living beings for their benefits weather its consuming them, making unnecessary cloths out them such as fur, experimenting and using them as entertainment like in the circus. The treatments these animals experience is beyond inhumane. There are many different experiments done on these animals for human safety, these tests are for cosmetic industries, medical training, testing drug or different types of toxic chemicals and food. Animal experimentation is extremely cruel, unnecessary and unreliable.

Noah Berlatsky. Farmington Hills, MI: Greenhaven Press, 2015. Current Controversies. Rpt. from "Animal Testing Is Bad Science: Point/Counterpoint."

I’m here today to talk about a controversial issue that has been around for a period of time, animal testing. Animal testing using animals in experiments with different chemical substances in everything from medical to cosmetic to determine their safety as well as effectiveness . It’s a problem that has existed since the 3rd and 4th centuries BCE with its merciless methods and painful ways of abusing animals for human demands, but now it’s time for it to stop. Our technology has developed significantly since; therefore, such medieval methods of torturing animals are no longer necessary. Researches have shown that each year, over 100 million animals are tortured and killed in American laboratories alone, including dogs, cats and more; this shows how far out of hand animal testing have gotten.

Conducting research on animals for human purposes is something that has been practiced for centuries. However, this topic has become extremely controversial after numerous loud outcries from animal rights organisations such as well-known PETA, Mercy For Animals, In Defence of Animals, and many others. Society has become aware of some spine-chilling and alarming statistical analyses which show that only in the US, more than 25 million animals are used for testing purposes on a yearly basis. Such insight divided the world on those who accept the sacrifice of animals for the sake of enhancing human lives, and on those who are completely startled by the sheer cruelty and lack of humanity in the 21st century. And yet, it is difficult to be completely biased and think we should stop animal testing once and for all.

Throughout thousands of years, animal testing has been proven to be beneficial for the human race. While it has done a wonderful job for us, it has only injured, killed and put an enormous amount of pain on animals. The exact number of animals used in research yearly is unknown, due to official government statistics not including mice, rats, birds, fish, or other animals used for testing: some estimates put the total number to be 26 million. The use of animals for scientific research is cruel and inhumane, while both humans and animals share similar traits, they are both made up of completely different genes making them poor test subjects to begin with and may mislead or cause side effects for both parties.

Therefore, any animal experimentation should further be carried out instead of scientists using humans as a means of experimenting. Animal experimentation has advanced tremendously throughout the years and has helped us advance in many medical discoveries. For example, because we have animal testing we have made advances in anesthesia, kidney dialysis, and without animal testing doctors would not have the chemotherapy to save 70% of children who now survive acute lymphatic leukemia (Americans for Medical Progress Educational Alliance). Another way to think about the successes of animal testing, Barbara Davies, deputy director of Research Defense Society, reports that “All you have to do is think of any major medical advances of the last 100 years to see the benefit of animal testing,” (Morrison, 2001). Supporters of animal experimentation argue that testing is not as cruel as it is believed to be by the common public.

Animal testing is also known as animal experimentation and is a problem that is growing worse each day. It is also a problem that many people know about but choose to ignore. Well ignoring these poor animals isn’t going to help them. Every year, worldwide, it is estimated that over ten million vertebrate animals from zebra fish to non-human primates are used for animal testing.

Animal testing is a phrase that most people have heard but are perhaps still unsure of exactly what it involve. Whether it is called animal testing, experimentation or research, it should be defined as all testing methods on animals including, medical exploration, cosmetics, toxicology trialing, and psychological examination involving animal subjects. It is used to assess the safety and effectiveness of medications and beauty products as well as understanding how the human physiology works. While supporters believe it is necessary practice, those against animal testing believe that it involves torture and suffering to animals. Medical research is the hardest case of proposition in the debate whether animal testing should be banned or not, since it has previously yielded substantial benefits for humanity.

Iza Iglesias and Lorna Collier both discuss their viewpoints on animal testing and provides evidence to support their argument. In the article, “ 8 million signatures needed in fight against animal testing”, Iglesias argues against animal testing while Collier defends it in her article titled, “Defending animal