Suzy's Argument With The Attorney: Case Study

FACTS: Jenny Stracner an employee of the Laguna Beach Police Department was told by several people that there several vehicles were seen in front of Greenwoods resident and the vehicles were only there for a couple of minutes. Stracner investigated these claims by staking out the residence and witnessing the vehicles at the residence for herself. After staking out the residence, she asked the garbage man to isolate garbage picked up and Greenwoods residence and hand them over to her. While looking through Greenwoods trash, Stracner located evidence that led her to believe Greenwood was involved with drugs. Stracner then received a search warrant and found large amounts of cocaine and other substance in the residence.

MILLERSBURG — Two evaluator say he is not guilty by reason of insanity, now it’s up to a judge to make a final finding in the case against a Millersburg man who allegedly wrote threatening letters to three deputies and a judge while incarcerated in the Holmes County Jail in December. Rhett Neville, 43, of 10489 Township Road 262, previously entered a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity in Holmes County Common Pleas Court to four counts of intimidation. Since, Neville has undergone psychiatric evaluations and two doctors have expressed opinions he should be found not guilty by reason of insanity. The consistency of the two evaluations, according to court discussions has brought the case to a point where defense attorney Andy Hyde said

The case involved an individual by the name of Danny Escobedo, who was arrested on January 19, 1960, for the murder of his brother-in-law. Escobedo was arrested without a warrant and interrogated; he did not make any statement to the police and was released after contacting his lawyer. On January 30, Benedict DiGerlando, told the police about Escobedo’s involvement in the crime that Escobedo “had fired the fatal shots” (Escobedo v. Illinois- Supreme Court Cases: The Dynamic Court, 1999, pg.2). He was later arrested a second time and taken to the police headquarters. Soon enough Escobedo requested to have “advice from my lawyer”

Parties: Ted Chimel (Plaintiff) v. The State of California (Defendant) Facts: The Police Officers arrived at the Plaintiff’s house with an arrest warrant for the alleged crime he had committed. The Plaintiff was not at home and his spouse let them in until Chimel return. Upon the Plaintiff entering the house, the police arrested him and request permission to search the house. The Plaintiff denied the request to search the house, but the police officers proceeded to search the house.

MILLERSBURG — A Shreve woman on Wednesday was sentenced to three years of probation for admittedly altering prescriptions for narcotics. Jennifer Varnes, 40, of 327 N. Prospect St., previously pleaded guilty in Holmes County Common Pleas Court to a single count of illegal processing of drug documents. In exchange for her guilty plea a second count of illegal processing of drug documents and two counts of forgery were dismissed. While she sought treatment in lieu of conviction, the request was derailed after she violated the terms of her bond by smoking marijuana.

Sam Richards Legal Studies: Vicki Lee Roach On December the 14th, 2002, Vickie Lee Roach, in a failed attempt to evade police after a robbery gone wrong, smashed into a young mans car, inflicting grievous burns to over 45 percent of his body. She was sentenced to 6 years prison with a non-parole period of 4 years. In 2006, the Coalition, under the hard line right wing John Howard, passed the Electoral and Referendum Amendment (Electoral Integrity and Other Measures) Act that made it impossible for any prisoner to vote during their period of incarceration. Prior to this, prisoners voting rights were protected under the the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (amended 1983). The Electoral act of 1918 made it possible for any prisoner serving under

Case III: A husband’s defense. Athens, ca. 400 B.C. The legal system of the Classical period of Ancient Greece is in effect, as the case date falls between 550 and 325 BC. The case falls under the laws of Solon, as cited within the passage, contrasting greatly with Drako’s harsher law regarding homicide (passed in 409 or 408 BC).

MILLERSBURG — Despite a plea for leniency expressed by the victim, a Sugarcreek man was unable to overcome a long history of criminal convictions and a bond violation when a Holmes County judge on Wednesday sentenced him to prison for making unwanted phone calls and threats to several members of a family over a period of months. David Lamar Schrock, 43, of 2578 State Route 39, previously pleaded guilty in Holmes County Common Pleas Court to two counts of telephone harassment and one count of menacing by stalking. In exchange for his guilty plea, the state agreed to dismiss two additional counts of telephone harassment and three counts of menacing by stalking. The charges are made more serious because Schrock was convicted, in January 2016,

A defense attorney represents the accused from arrest to final appeal. An individual accused of a crime has a constitutional right to counsel during every stage in the criminal process. Defense attorneys represent their clients before trial starting from arrest and through interrogation, lineup, and arraignment. They may negotiate a plea bargain with the prosecutor to avert a trial or defend their client at trial. Defense attorneys provide assistance at sentencing and appeal if the accused is convicted.

Jessica Hillis Instructor Fisk CRM-123 13 Nov 2016 Case Brief 3 Commonwealth v. Berggren 496 N.E.2d 660 (1986) Procedural History: The defendant is on trial for the crime of homicide caused by the careless operation of a motor vehicle such to endanger public safety. Facts: The defendant was pursued by an on-duty police officer in a marked police car. The defendant chose not to stop for “fear of his license” and caused the officer to pursue him for approximately six miles.

“What to Do About Mrs. Carmichael” Kiranjeet Singh Kaur Student ID 1725920 Fairleigh Dickinson University, Vancouver Campus Case Write Up 2 01/April/2016   Summary Municipal Redevelopment Agency (MRA) has appointed an assistant project director with two specialists, with the responsibility of determining which houses in an older community qualify for either a renovation grant or demolition. One home that qualifies based upon building codes for demolition belongs to 82-year woman named Mrs. Carmichael. She has lived in the home for last 30 years and the mortgage has been paid off, but due to her neglect in repairing because of the decrease in the value of money from year to year, condition of the house became worse and according to the standards it has to be demolished. However, Harmon, one of the specialist, doesn’t feel so good about it and want to make some exception, whereas the other specialist, Franklin, insists that you cannot go around making exceptions.

COURTS The court system is made up of many operational parts that all work together to achieve an overall goal. For my courtroom observation I have chosen the State of Florida v Casey Marie Anthony trial. This trail took place on the 23rd floor of the Orange county courtroom in Florida which seats about 50 people. Casey Marie Anthony (the defendant) is on trial for the death of her two-year-old daughter Caylee Marie Anthony. She is being tried for first degree murder, aggravated child abuse, aggravated manslaughter of a child, and four counts of providing false information to police.

Negligence is the breach of a duty caused by the omission to do something which a reasonable man, guided by those considerations which ordinarily regulate the conduct of human affairs would do, or doing something which a prudent and reasonable man would not do. Actionable negligence consists in the neglect of the use of ordinary care or skill towards a person to whom the defendant owes the duty of observing ordinary care and skill, by which neglect the plaintiff has suffered injury to his person or property. ELEMENTS OF NEGLIGENCE CLAIMS The definition involves three constituents of negligence: (1) A legal duty to exercise due care on the part of the party complained of towards the party complaining the former’s conduct within the scope

Question 1 Ashley Alford vs Aaron’s Inc Ashley Alford was in 2011-awarded $ 95 million after winning a sexual harassment case against Aaron Inc. The award that Alford received included $ 80 million for punitive damages and $ 15 million in compensation. In the federal court, Aaron’s Inc a rent to own organization was found liable for the abuse that Alford suffered as she worked at Fairview Heights. The sexual harassment case culminated from Richard Moore, a store manager having lifted Alford, flung her to the floor, and masturbated over her as he held her down in October 2006.

Since we know that Sonja is new to her position, the first thing Cliff should have done was to discuss about the goal of the meeting with Sonja. More specific, the purpose of the meeting was for her and Cindy to come to an understanding about sales expectation. The next thing that Cliff should have went over with Sonja is the important of following procedures. We know that it is good management practice for supervisors to have standing plans specified to certain situations. Having procedures limit the chances that things would go out of control.