Summary Of Chapter 14: A War For Union And Emancipation

The Northerners, for instance, fought to defend state sovereignty (lecture December 8). Therefore, the causes of the Civil War remain a debate. Although one hundred and fifty-one years have passed, many historians still debate whether the cause of the war was slavery or not. Charles B. Dew in his essay, “Apostles of Disunion: Southern Secession Commissioners and the Causes of the Civil War”, argues

In this paper there has been a discussion of the legislation and the tensions preceding the southern Secession. Based on this discussing it can be concluded that the tensions, which culminated with the Civil War, were present many decades before the secession itself. Even threats of Civil war and secession were present much prior to this particular conflict. 
This paper has also concluded that the threat of Lincoln was real to the South, because of the Republican party’s very distinct foundation as an anti-slavery party. Slavery was a soft spot in the South because of the substantial value slaves had.

After the colonization of America took place, sectionalism emerged between the now industrialized North and the agrarian South. Throughout the existing sections in the North and South, different perspectives about social, cultural, and economic issues such as slavery, rights, and tariffs arose, proving to be the foundation for the American Civil War. The economy called for a strong sense of unity and support within the regions due to the need for modern transportation in importing and exporting purchased goods for war. Led by President Davis, the Confederate economy of the South was unsuccessful in reaching its highest capability. Meanwhile President Abraham Lincoln led the Union States of the North to a prosperous industrial economy.

Allen Guelzo and Vincent Harding approached Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation and the eventual abolition of slavery from two very different viewpoints. The major disagreement between them is whether the slaves freed themselves, or Abraham Lincoln and his Emancipation Proclamation freed them. Harding argued the former view, Guelzo took the later. When these essays are compared side by side Guelzo’s is stronger because, unlike Harding, he was able to keep his own views of American race relations out of the essay and presented an argument that was based on more than emotion. Allen Guelzo

Slavery played a central role during the American Civil War. At this time, the primary catalyst for secession was slavery especially due to the resistance of leaders in the Southern politics through attempts by the antislavery political forces of the North to block the slavery’s expansion into the western territories. According to the SCWE, the lives of slaves went through significant changes. In the South, for example, the broad areas of the land were taken control of by the Union Armies. During the war, an active role was played by the slaves in their emancipation.

The Civil War Era was an extremely pivotal and revolutionary time in American History. Even as one nation, the separation between the South and North were becoming increasingly noticeable and tensionable, thus the Civil War Era. It has been noted that one of the driving factors behind the cause of the Civil War were the increasingly different economies between the North and South. The North and South had a symbiotic relationship with one another so as the driving forces behind the economies of each grew apart and their fundamentals started differ, problems arose. One of the main dilemmas being slavery, and its impact on the economy.

“The Civil War started because of uncompromising differences between the free and slave states over the power of the national government to prohibit slavery in the territories that had not yet become states” (Council on Foreign Relations). Confederates initial plan was to have their Navy attack Union commerce at Sea. During this time, commerce raiding was centuries old, Americans had much success raiding British commerce in the Revolutionary War and the War of 1812. In the end, the South lost. Although the South was not entirely composed of Anti-Federalists, they still opposed the formation of a strong centralized government.

In America in the 1840s and 1850s the north were growing industrially and relying on factories while the south was still rural and all about agriculture the two were growing apart. There became the debate over slavery and the north saw it has morally wrong while the south saw no problem with it. In the 1860s the south finally seceded from the union when Lincoln became president. In effort to try and help with issues there became many compromises like the compromise of 1850. While some believe the civil war started over “Uncle Tom’s Cabin” there is historical evidence that shows that the real causes for the secession of the southern states and the starting of the civil war to force them back into the union, were overwhelmingly the caning of

As new states became free states, the pro slavery cultures viewed these motives as undermining of their system. When Republican President Lincoln became elected in 1861 the south went into a panic and began succeeding from the Union. The war took off in a effort to rejoin the states. In the beginning of the war, slavery wasn’t touched. Blacks that fell into Union hands were returned

During the Civil War in the 19th century, one problem the war solved was to protect and keep the Union together. The war successfully stopped the South from seceding. That was the main purpose of the war before the question of ending slavery was the main goal of the war. Abraham Lincoln voiced that he did not want war when he was first elected, but when the slave states wanted to secede peacefully, Lincoln didn’t take that lightly. He felt that secession in any form is an exercise of power (Hakim 16).

Before the election of 1860, the conflicts between the north and the south were already significant. The meltdown of the 1850s is the compilation of a series of events where the north and the south disagreed. Such disagreements inspired the succession of southern states which eventually sparked the American Civil War. In the decade before the civil war, the north and south’s point of view of the slavery institution became poles apart. The north wanted to eradicate it, while the south wanted to spread it to the newly acquired territories.

The North consisted of 19 free states in which slavery was prohibited and in the South 15 slave states which could own slaves. A major figure of this war includes Abraham Lincoln, Lincoln usually called this “a house divided”. The main reason for slavery in the south was the warm climate and the long growing

‘Slavery was the root cause of secession’. ‘November 6 1860, Lincoln was elected president of America which resulted in panic emerging in the South’ . The election of Lincoln as president who was a Republican leader meant that ideologies, movements and values from the North would be implemented in the South which meant the abolition of slavery. Slavery was a huge characteristic of the South as the economy; politics; social status and psychological mind-sets were influenced by the process of slavery. The southern white population then derived the idea of secession which meant the South would gain independence from Northern aggression .

After the election of Abraham Lincoln in 1860 and the rise of the Republican party, Southerners feared the tipping of the balance of political power against them; their need for self-determination parallel the colonists’ belief of rebelling against the oppressive government of Great Britain. However, the Civil War represented something more: the clash of the feudalistic, agrarian South with the industrialized, capitalistic North. These two powers differed socially, politically, and economically, and were especially conflicted over slavery. These two sections of the United States were divided against one another, and could not survive this way. Therefore, it is more accurate to state that though the Civil War resembled some aspects of the American Revolution, it was a clash between two forces who could not exist with one another in their current state, leading inevitably to conflict between the

Would it be good to have a country split without any arguments or a country as a whole full of arguments? In the beginning of 1860, The South wanted to secede from the Union, but the Union didn’t like that idea. Months later, they began a war. There were many reasons why the South wanted to secede but the main reasons were because of slavery disagreements, sectionalism, and political arguments. The southern states seceded from the Union because of sectionalism, political differences, and slavery disagreements.