Imagen what the world would be like if Martin Luther King Jr. and Susan B Anthony never presented their impactful speeches that changed history. For one component life would be more restricted and filled with violence and discrimination. Women would still look upon from a society point of view as weak and less than a man. The US constitution might even be changed to favor men. African Americans or any other race, of color, would be in fear, persecuted, and separated from the rest of society. Let alone having no privileges of a US citizen. There are so many away each and every individual would be affected if these two-monumental people didn’t change history to affect the world we know today. Although their speeches contain a surplus of similarities and differences between Kings and Anthony’s speeches differences are …show more content…
Whether it was against race, or sex both authors were denied their civil, and constitutional rights. It was a hard uphill battle to find justice, both authors campaigned large political movement risking their lives, dignity, and social rank. However, Instead of having a protest that involved rash violent actions, they lead a peaceful protest and achieved the impossible that made a louder voice in history then a violent reaction would have ever done. By look at the difficult situation both of them were in they had to but into contexts of all the emotions and social event/ rights that were happening. Their odds for success were almost slim to none they both power through and stood strong using their present situation whether positive or negative to empower their speeches to radiate in every heart to change history. Despite the number of context similarities King and Anthony had they both also have multiple differences in terms of the context, they wrote their speeches in. for instance, King wrote his speech in a time of utmost fear. Fear that repeated in every heart of the American Community.
Rhetorical and literary devices has been utilized to persuade an audience throughout history. In Dr. King’s “I Have a Dream” speech and Frederick Douglass’ “Address to the Massachusetts Anti-slavery society” speech, they articulate the injustices the black man has experienced over the years by exercising allusion and anaphora. King and Douglass, both civil rights activist, desire action from society; they seek true equality for their black brethren. King and Douglass use allusion to create a recollection in the minds of their audience in order to reinforce their intents. King states, “five score years ago, a great American, in whose symbolic shadow we stand today, signed the Emancipation Proclamation” referring to Abraham Lincoln.
There is one undeniable fact about life: Human Rights are a necessity. It is basic and bare minimum, yet we have struggled to respect those rights in the History of America and the history of the world as a whole. We have seen many activists focus on this topic, many of whom have made life easier for those whose differences seem to refuse them refuge, two of whom are Martin Luther King Jr., and Elie Wiesel. King and Wiesel were legendary activists whose ability to share stories of trauma and pain led to social change. King and Wiesel use literary devices such as repetition and metaphors to convey a message of equality and peace throughout their speeches.
1963 and 1964, two pivotal years in American history. In 1963 Martin Luther King Jr. wrote “Letter from Birmingham Jail” and in 1964 Malcom X wrote “The Ballot or the Bullet”. Before, during, and after these two years the United States was a place where racial equality was inexistent. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were pioneers in bringing attention to this issue. Both men wrote letters and released them to the public, one from a jail cell and another recited his letter in a church.
Elie Wiesel and Martin Luther King both gave speeches to express and remind the people of immense issues We have committed in our history using literary elements such as themes about freedom and prominent Diction about even children being mistreated. Both incredibly influential people had to go through atrocities We the people have let happen. It was a call for help and a way to always remind everyone to never forget what They and their people went through.
Connor Smith Mrs. DiCiaula 2nd period Fredrick Douglas Essay "Out of the mountain of despair, a stone of hope" (Martin Luther King Junior). A man before Martin Luther King’s time, Fredrick Douglas, exemplifies this quote immensely; through many trials Douglas faced in slavery, he overcame them and sought out his freedom. In the narrative of Fredrick Douglas and “What is Your Fourth of July to Me? ,” the two texts share commonalities and differences. Both texts share the same purpose in which to inform and persuade the audience while maintaining the same subject of freedom.
Nearly a century following the Emancipation Proclamation, African Americans in the South still faced a world of inequality, segregation, and other forms of oppression. “Jim Crow” laws, state and local laws enforcing racial segregation, were prime examples of this. In 1954, the US Supreme Court put in place the “separate but equal” doctrine that formed the basis for state sanctioned discrimination, drawing attention to the plight of African Americans. During the years that followed, activists used nonviolent protest and civil disobedience to bring about change. Among these leaders were Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X, two prominent activists during this time.
What does Martin Luther King, Thomas Paine and Henry David Thoreau have in common? They stood up and made a difference by protesting. All three of these people protested different things at different times but all three had one common goal: unity. Martin Luther King protested civil rights for African Americans. He was the dominant leader of the United States civil rights movement.
Rosa Parks, Martin Luther King Jr., and Susan B. Anthony: all these people are known as heroes. They are also criminals, according to the laws of their time. All these brave men and women went to jail for their beliefs against the justice system, willingly accepting their punishments, and leading peaceful protests in the change of laws for which they were arrested. Their inspiration reached out to other causes as well, such as the anti-Vietnam war protests. They are all testaments to the power of civil disobedience, and the impact it continues to have on American society.
Martin Luther King Jr. inexplicably opened the eyes of Americans across the nation with his role in the movement and his use of resonating imagery, excellent emotional appeal, powerful voice, and evocation of logic in his “I Have a Dream” speech. With such an enthralling rhetoric he gained a vast amount of support and exponentially increased the pride in standing up for what’s righteous and just. Exemplifying the throes of being a colored person, King evoked sympathy whilst simultaneously applying the valid logic that no human should be subjected to lesser standards. His rhetoric wholly changed American history that day and thus conveyed his ability to maintain equanimity throughout all of the
They both tried to be uplifting and pushed for nonviolence. Both speeches dealt with blacks and their freedom. The speeches were intelligently written and full of phrases that expressed the authors’ feelings. Both felt that God wanted all people to be free and treated equally.
Martin Luther King and Elie Wiesel both use imagery to show the oppression and cruelties of what happened to their people. Both speakers use repetition to give messages of change, although King uses more hopeful messages to inspire positive changes rather than the sorrowful influence used by Wiesel. Both speakers try to give the audience reasons to grow and change. Elie Wiesel uses literary elements to show the sorrow and oppression of the acts committed against the Jews. Elie uses imagery to talk about his past while he is prejudiced for being a Jew.
In the text he says, "I wish you had commended the Negro sit inners and demonstrators of Birmingham for their sublime courage, their willingness to suffer and their amazing discipline in the midst of great provocation. One day the South will recognize its real heroes. As you can see King expresses his feeling of the negro sit-inners and demonstrators not given the verdict of being the "real heroes" of the south which they were king also give off a slight glance of angry towards this as well. As well as fur Roosevelt he too give off a tone of noble and a slightness of anger. In the Four Freedom speech he says things like, " it 's not probable
Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X are two profound African American figures in history. They both fought for equality and to better humanity. But, the tactics they used were very different. Their different views may have been rooted from the where they were raised. Martin Luther King Jr. grew up in a middle class family and received a very solid education.
Both Martin Luther and King Henry Vlll had similars goals for the catholic church. Both wanted the reformation of the church and disagreed strongly with the Pope. However both of them had different motives for why they were challenging the church. Luther's goal was based on religion where Henry's was based on himself and what he could gain from it. Martin Luther was known for leading a group called the Lutherans.
The main idea of his speech is that all people were created equal and, although this is no longer the case nowadays, King felt it must be the case for the future. He argued peacefully, yet passionately and powerfully. In preparation for the speech, he studied the Bible, The Gettysburg Address and the US Declaration of Independence and he alludes to all three in his address. The intensity of King’s speech is built through parallelism, metaphors, bold statements and rhythmic repetitions: