The world’s history is not perfect. Events occurred and lessons were learned. With the critical race theory booming within school environments, it is becoming very hard for teachers to discuss the world’s past. The critical race theory could negatively impact teachers' jobs, misinform teachers concerning politically acceptable content, and discourage discussion over the important periods in history that are unchangeable. Therefore, the critical race theory should be disregarded as a new law in school districts. To begin, there is a shortage of teachers and substitutes in classrooms. The critical race theory is causing many teachers across the world to lose occupations. Teachers do not teach with the intention of targeting students. In 1990, …show more content…
In February 2022, fourteen states passed prohibitions on teaching about racial topics that could possibly cause disagreement or hostility between people. (Krebs). Any topic could arouse disagreement; that’s what makes each human an individual. Different states have stricter or broader interpretations of the critical race theory that do not punish teachers for merely teaching a concept that exists without advocating for the truth of the concept. Joshua Gutzmann analyzed the pros and cons from broader interpretations leaving teachers skeptical about which curriculum is allowed to be taught. He found, “Educators fearing a broad interpretation of these bans do not feel comfortable teaching critical aspects of the U.S. History, including slavery, the Civil War, World War II, and the Holocaust,” (Gutzmann). Aside from teachers, librarians within school districts are affected by the critical race theory. Librarians are struggling to uphold books on shelves for students. Recently, the Supreme Court stated school boards cannot restrict library books because members disagree with the content that is being portrayed. The board argued back that the books were “anti-America and anti-Christian”. The Supreme Court ruled this violated the First Amendment relating to Tinker vs. Des Moines, a supreme …show more content…
The past is what unleashed the problems the critical race theory is causing. In order to prevent issues such as racism, gender inequalities, etc., the past must be able to be rationalized. Analyst of K-12 teachers’ speech protection, Lindsay Krebs, stated, “Conservative proponents purport that these laws protect objective, unbiased, and balanced teaching by preventing teachers from introducing concepts about racism,” (Krebs). Slavery and women's suffrage are controversial topics that are necessary to reiterate because there is no moving forward without getting uncomfortable. Working for the Administration of Education Programs, Joshua Gutzmann expresses, “Schools should prepare students for democratic life, noting that access to ideas makes it possible for citizens to exercise their rights of free speech and press in a meaningful manner, such access prepares students for active and effective participation in society in which they will soon be adult members,” (Gutzmann). Stepping aside from historic topics, music has also been accused of being racially motivated within schools. Due to the fact that not all cultures of music are taught in a musical classroom comes off offensive and disregarding of other ethnic backgrounds. Hypocritically, if other cultures of music were to be talked upon, this would come off as targeting a specific ethnic background. Chiao-Wei Liu, a professor at the College of Columbia
Bettina Love supports her thesis that the education system is broken and unsupportive of dark children through history. The reason we learn history is to learn from the mistakes and successes of others; Dr. Love points out that the negative aspects of American history are still prevalent today. After the Civil War, former slaves worked as sharecroppers for plantation owners in hopes of repaying debt. The debt was impossible to pay, and the plantation owners continued to put the former slaves to work without fair pay. Love analogizes the situation to the broken education system, saying that, “black students are sharecroppers, never able to make up the cost or close the gap because they are learning in a state of perpetual debt with no relief in sight” ((Love, 2019, p. 92).
The history of the United States of America has often been punctuated by moments of triumph, and also by grievous lapses in moral and ethical judgements. For years, students have learned about the entirety of our country’s history in school. However, a school board in Colorado recently attempted to prevent this from happening. Their decision to alter the American history curriculum in order to promote patriotic values angered many students, who then protested this decision. Leonard Pitts, a journalist for the Miami Herald, openly criticized the school board’s move.
By laying out all the different roles, structures, and policies that work to uphold White Supremacist beliefs in the educational field, it exposes the fallacy of a successful and equitable education system. In doing so, the authors demand educators to contend with their personal responsibility and accountability. It is not enough to be culturally responsive; educators must critically engage with the education system, acknowledge the barriers that exist due to structural racism, work together to demand structural change that contends with race, and maintain a critical perspective that fosters a “healthy skepticism” that is “inherently hopeful” (p. 300). The authors demonstrate their willingness to do just that throughout the entire chapter by continuously calling attention to systemic issues and providing hopeful alternatives and suggestions to the reader.
Peter’s personal interaction of his political speech does not need to be taken into consideration. Here case law supports the school’s preemptive measures because the flag could be interpreted in a racial way that can cause a foreseeable issue. Adding to this, the second case, Scott v. School Board (2003), argued in the 11th circuit court that one cannot ban political speech if there is no prior recording of significant issues with this speech. However, it was found that even a single instance of racial problems or significant racial tension is grounds to claim a reasonable forecast of problems. Again, the ruling is relevant to the 7th circuit court because the arguments still bring up valid points that could
One of the main reasons why race is not discussed in the classroom is because it is an uncomfortable subject to discuss. One reason why people do not talk about race in the classroom was because they were taught that it was impolite to do so. In an article titled Why Can’t We Talk About Race, the author Noliwe Rooks asserts Feeling uncomfortable because race or racism is mentioned in your presence just doesn’t compare to the economic, psychological, and spiritual consequences of structured racial inequality […] Of course, the problem is that many of us—black and white alike—have been taught that race and racism, like politics and money, are impolite topics best left unexplored with strangers. By the time we’ve entered the academy, many of us have already absorbed this truism.
Glenn Youngkin was sworn into office as governor of Virginia on January 15th, 2022, with the intention of prohibiting the teachings of Critical Race Theory (CRT) and other “divisive concepts” on his first day in office. I will give it to him - he followed through with it. Executive Order One, signed by Governor Youngkin, announced that public schools were no longer allowed to discuss topics that “divided” children and were harmful. Given how adamant he has been to ban CRT from being taught in schools, one would believe that Governor Youngkin had strong evidence to back up his claims. However, Youngkin struggles with specifying his exact reasoning for banning Critical Race Theory.
Future generations endure the burdens that current generations produce, curbed by the advances we make. Teaching students about history shows previous attempts and solutions at the matter in question, helping them process critically. Critical Race Theory (C.R.T) discusses systemic inequalities involving racial bias within the American legal system, originally created for law school discourse. However, why would this course be beneficial for younger students? It would introduce students to more circumstances that could directly impact and help students to process more real world issues critically.
Precious Knowledge presents the controversial issue of the integration of ethnic studies courses in schooling. Ethnic studies is the study of cultural, racial, ethnic, and gender differences in America. In this essay, I will argue Ethnic studies courses should belong in P-12 schooling, because the classes endorse ideals of America. In addition, people rely on the courses to learn critical thinking of the empowerment of identity. Although advocates for the abolishment of ethnic studies courses argue that the courses create a sense of contempt towards America through racism and are not remarkably significant, they do not fully comprehend the success from ethnic studies and that by taking away the classes, they only promote their fear of students disliking America.
This paper will discuss the importance of understanding the impact of teacher diversity on student outcomes, including the role of teacher expectations and cultural competency, and the impact of role models and mentorship. This history of the underrepresentation of African American teachers and its impacts on student outcomes is a multifaceted topic that requires careful examination and consideration. By exploring this history, we can gain a deeper understanding of the ongoing challenges and opportunities facing African American students, teachers, and the education system. The history of African American education in the United States is a complex and often painful story shaped by centuries of racism, discrimination, and oppression. During the era of slavery in the United States, African slaves were systematically denied the right to education.
Critical race theory is an organized framework for the exact purpose of critical argument and racism theory that is based on the idea that race is not a characteristic of physically distinct groups, but instead a culturally defined category that is used to oppress minority groups. In “The Trials of Critical Race Theory”, this documentary shares the different points of view based on the citizens' personal beliefs and experiences about teaching race at school. Critical race theory critics are expressing their concerns regarding the systematic racism that is occurring in schools due to its implementation. The documentary is showing the different perspectives on how critical race theory should be taught in schools, whether race and
The critical pedagogy movement aims to challenge the status quo of deculturalization by empowering the powerless and encompassing various viewpoints whilst pushing back on the dominant culture. Critical pedagogy has been becoming more prevalent throughout the educational system however in recent times has begun to spark political backlash and debate over the educational system in the United States. As the ideology of the old view of American oppressor and oppressed becomes challenged many citizens in the oppressor group find themselves vulnerable and have begun lashing out politically and socially. Although this fight has been going on for over one hundred years
The educational system in America contains numerous racial disparities that affects the very core of the children who is suppose to benefit from education. This disparity comes in many forms in primary schools, a teacher’s attitude being one of them (Epps, 1995). A teacher’s attitude in a classroom consisting of a racially diverse children is a large contributing factor to the academic success of their students, more specifically, the minority African American students. It is a given that all schools should employ qualified teacher who are passionate about their students and the quality of education they provide to these students. Unfortunately, that is not the case for many urban schools that house a large proportion of African American students
In this paper, I will be critiquing these articles and films in order to evaluate the purpose of these readings and how they have helped further develop race in America. But most importantly, whether the author has achieved its purpose to inform readers about CRT, whiteness, and racial inequality. First article, I will be analyzing is Critical Race Theory: An Introduction by Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic. Both authors explore Critical Race Theory in detail. As I previously mentioned, CRT is one of the most important developments mainly in the legal studies department.
INTRODUCTION “We conclude that in the field of public education the doctrine of ‘separate but equal’ has no place.” -Chief Justice Earl Warren Separate But Equal, directed by George Stevens Jr, is an American made-for-television movie that is based on the landmark Brown v. Board of Directors case of the U.S. Supreme court which established that segregation of primary schools based on race, as dictated by the ‘Separate but Equal’ doctrine, was unconstitutional based on the reinterpretation of the 14th amendment and thus, put an end to state-sponsored segregation in the US. Aims and Objectives:
Without a doubt racism still has an influence in the education system. Students in school today are still harmed by prejudice in the system and this interview is verification for those instances. My interviewee and I attended the same elementary and high school together. We shared