Pros And Cons Of Abolishing The Electoral College

Throughout this time, our views on the Electoral College have went in all kinds of ways.  The big reason for the Electoral College, was so that the whole country had a more equal say on choosing the national president.   In each state the electors gather on the Monday following the second Tuesday of December. Each state has electoral votes according to the number of House members and Senators it has in Congress.

Although this seems a reasonable approach this causes more of an issue of fragmentation than congressional district ting. Lastly, there is the Electoral College with super electors. This idea was introduced by Arthur Schlesinger Jr. in 2000. he proposed that “... candidates would continue to compete for electors on a state-by-state, winner-take-all basis, but the winner of the national popular vote would be awarded a set of bonus

A simple solution would be to assign the majority of Electors to represent each individual congressional districts rather and only two to represent the states. Each districts’ Electoral votes would be cast for whichever candidate wins the majority of votes in said district and the two state votes would go to whoever wins the majority of districts in each states. This way is more democratic because the people would be represented on a smaller level than the states; for example, Republicans in Upstate New York or central California, or Democrats in southwestern Texas, wouldn’t be subject to supporting presidential candidates they voted against. Yet these compromises would not outright destroy the Electoral College, just slightly modify it, satisfying Constitutional

The Electoral College 1. Identify the reasoning of the framers of the Constitution for creating such an unusual system by which we choose our presidents. a. In 1787 the Electoral College was created by the framers of the Constitution. They devised a method to elect a president that would ensure that the person elected would not gain too much power and independence.

The electoral college is not as effective as it was in the past, we have more people now and there are more laws placed so that everyone could vote. The electoral college has many problems due to the ‘swing states’ which are the most densely populated states causing the state vote to have too much power. If America were to get rid of the electoral college then every vote will count and everyone would have the same amount of

First, the amount of Electoral College votes would become proportionate to the number of citizens within a state in a 1:1 ratio to reflect the outcome of the popular vote. This can be done by using the Congressional District Method used in Nebraska and Maine, (http://news.psu.edu/) where the states follow the popular vote within their districts, as opposed to a statewide popular vote. Then, the districts tally their votes to properly give a number of Electoral votes, in turn separating each electoral vote by candidate and changing the system so it does not reflect that of a winner-take-all scenario, but that of a split Electoral College

Firstly, the Electoral College goes against the Constitution. According to the United States Constitution, it is stated that the purpose of the Electoral Colleges is to “establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.” The Electoral College does not promote these

("Should the Electoral College be abolished?" n.d.) Another downfall of the electoral college system is that votes cast in smaller states are more significant than those of larger states because the smaller states have fewer electoral votes. Therefor every vote from the people has much more weight than those from larger states. Without the electoral college, candidates

When the founding fathers set up the Electoral College, it served our country well. It was an effective way of tallying the votes for the Presidential election. Since the votes were counted by

Debate has arisen on whether this system should still be used to elect a president after the election of Donald Trump. The Electoral College should be preserved since it represents all states fairly, and exemplifies efficiency. Firstly, states are represented evenly through the Electoral College. In the article “Should the United States Keep or Abandon the

With the Electoral College people are “Ignoring New York, California and Texas or nearly 30% of the population”(Passage 3) People may not even get to choose who they vote for. With the electoral vote it makes states like Ohio more important than Rhode Island because it is a “swing state.” The process for the Electoral College is not even the same in some of the states because each state has it’s own rules. It also makes elections so much more complicated than it needs to be. The Electoral College takes away power from the people, and that is the foundation that this country was supposed to be built on.

Then, they build campaign platforms with a national focus, which means that the winner will serve all of the country’s needs. If the election only depended on the popular vote, candidates could limit campaigning to heavily populated areas or specific regions. Tina Mullaly, a South Dakota Representative, stated, “the Electoral College protects small state and minority interests and that a national popular vote would be like two wolves and a sheep deciding what’s for dinner.” (Tina Mullaly) Without the electoral college, some states like Iowa and Ohio with small farmers or factory workers they would be ignored for having favor of pandering to metropolitan areas with a higher population density.

The Electoral College is very helpful in terms of giving individual states the chance to vote without being overruled by large cities. There is many controversy around such a thing, for many people believe that the Electoral College silences the actual vote of the citizens of the United States of America. The Electoral College is an innovative way to give equal chances, and I do believe that it is a clever way to do such a thing, though many believe that there should be a better way to run an election, or to simply let the candidate win off of the popular vote only. In conclusion, I support the cause and way the electoral college is used to help give states/provinces an equal vote to that of major cities, to make it easier correct mistakes

Our country runs as smooth as it can with the electoral college, and while there are some flaws within it, it is by far our best option for voting. The biggest flaw is that people aren’t taught how it works or why we use it. If we can do that early in life, it will increase votes and voters. Even if we wanted to change, none of these methods are as effective as this electoral college, so should thus not be eliminated and replaced. Works Cited Congressional district method.

Several years after the United States came to be, the Constitutional Convention met to determine how the new nation should govern itself. The delegates saw that it was crucial to have a president and vice president, but the delegates did not want these offices to reflect how the colonies were treated under the British rule. The delegates believed that the president’s power should be limited, and that he should be chosen through the system known as the Electoral College. The Electoral College is a body of people who represent the states of the US, who formally cast votes for the electing of the president and vice president. Many citizens feel that the Electoral College goes against our nation’s principle of representative democracy, while others