Sage Mumford
Government 2A
Baker
27 February 2023
Electoral college The electoral college has served us greatly for over 200 years. Citizens and politicians have tried to correct or eliminate the electoral college. This would be successful if we had a better alternative, but, we don’t. The electoral college is the best option for the United States because the other three ways, the district method, popular vote, and proportional allocation, have too many flaws. First, the electoral college is better than the district method. In the district method, each district is responsible for one vote. This means that states could have part of each party within the state. Currently, Maine and Nebraska practice this way for elections because this is a
…show more content…
The popular vote consists of exactly what it means; everyone votes on the president and the one with the most votes win. The problem with the popular vote is it would cause more time and money that America doesn’t have. To ensure everyone’s vote is counted for, there is no multiple votes, or false votes would be hard to successfully do. Also, if the votes were close then people would demand a recount. That is just more time, stress, and money just to make sure the people know the votes were correct. “That means the cost of counting all the votes would be duplicated. With the polarization in global politics today, especially in the United States, a switch to the popular vote would likely increase costs even further” (18 Pros and Cons of Popular Vote). With already billions under our belt for elections, this money possibly getting duplicated would be unreasonable. Implementing popular vote, although would increase voters because every vote is counted the same and they would feel like their vote matters. This would be great, but with how we are doing voting right now, it’s gaining voters as well. Every year we gain voters and lose voters because of age, but this year we will gain 4,000,000 newly 18 voters who can cast their vote in the electoral college. Also, in the electoral college, every vote is counted toward the person you want to win in one way or the other. So, in both ways to elect, the votes are counted and everyone has …show more content…
Our country runs as smooth as it can with the electoral college, and while there are some flaws within it, it is by far our best option for voting. The biggest flaw is that people aren’t taught how it works or why we use it. If we can do that early in life, it will increase votes and voters. Even if we wanted to change, none of these methods are as effective as this electoral college, so should thus not be eliminated and replaced.
Works Cited
Congressional district method. Electoral College Reform - Home. (n.d.). Retrieved March 3, 2023, from https://electoralcollegereform.weebly.com/congressional-district- method.html#:~:text=There%20are%20a%20number%20of%20reasons%20why%20the,The%20congressional%20districts%20are%20designed%20by%20the%20states. Gaille, L. (2019, December 16). 18 pros and cons of popular vote. Vittana.org. Retrieved March 3, 2023, from https://vittana.org/18-pros-and-cons-of-popular-vote
Proportional allocation. Electoral College Reform - Home. (n.d.). Retrieved March 3, 2023, from
This proposal will give each and every citizen a chance to vote. Statistics show that more people will vote if they know that there vote will make a difference. This proposal fits modern America because it will allow every American to make their voice heard when determing what President should be in office and what changes should be made. This system will allow the election of the President to be easy and fair. Direct Reflection with Instant Runoff Voting could be used with or without the Electoral College in effect.
The United States government is one of the most admired and complex in the world, On the contrary one of the fundamental components that has an extensive impression on the American People and the Election is the Electoral College. Our founding fathers created The Electoral College over two hundred years ago, and it is still in effect today. They feared that having just the Popular Vote would give too much power to one person. In this paper, we will be discussing what the Electoral College is, the benefits and disadvantages of the Electoral College as well as if the Electoral College should be abolished or reconstructed.
The United States has benefited from the Electoral College for hundreds of years. This essay will discuss the presidential voting process and the merits of the Electoral College. The Electoral College is a more effective method of choosing the president than the general election. This is due to the fact that it greatly improves efficiency and ensures the integrity of the election. There would be a huge number of candidates to pick from if the Electoral College did not exist and we had a public vote instead.
Should the Electoral College Be Replaced by the Direct Election of the President? A Debate The presidency and election of the presidency is often viewed as the main focus of the American political system. In recent years the election process and Electoral College have come under scrutiny and reconsideration due to how important the election is. In this paper we will examine the two different arguments about whether or not the Electoral College is a democratic and useful system.
Although I also don’t believe they should use direct popular vote. The problem with the electoral college is that is disguises the legit results of the election, and brings an unfair advantage. The problem with direct popular vote as I stated earlier leaves the smaller areas with less representation. With direct popular vote a candidate will focus mainly on the higher populated areas as a strategy to win. How unfair is that to areas that have a low population?
The US’s Electoral College has always been a controversial topic. When it was written into the Constitution, it was meant as a compromise between the small and large states, and between Congress and the states (M. West). Since then, the Electoral College system has been how the United States elected its presidents. However, it continues to face criticism and many want the system to change, favoring systems such as a national popular vote instead (National Conference of State Legislatures). Despite how the US’s Electoral College effectively balances power between the states and the federal government, it is still a deeply flawed voting system due to it being based on unrealistic expectations and outdated ideals that should be changed to reflect
Emma Williams American Government 1A Mr. Baker 2 March 2023 The Positives of the Electoral College Once a teenager turns eighteen, they have the privilege to practice their right of voting for their local and federal government officials. Unlike voting for their mayor or House Representatives, the Presidential elections require the Electoral College. Established in Article II of the Constitution, the Founding Fathers decided the best way to elect the President was by both using congressional powers and equal representation. To explain, each state automatically gets two votes representing their Senators, then depending on the number of Representatives in the state, the number of Electoral votes a state gets are decided.
While there are valid arguments against the Electoral College, it remains a vital component of the American political system. One significant criticism of the Electoral College is that it increases the likelihood of a political candidate securing the presidency without receiving a large majority of the vote. Given this, people must remember why the founding fathers proposed the Electoral College. It was a way to ensure that all states, not just the ones with the most people, have a say in the election (Kirch). Without the Electoral College, candidates will be slightly more motivated to run for office in less populated states because such states' challenges and needs will likely go unmet.
The United States Electoral College is a system that has been in place since the country's founding, and it has been the subject of much debate and controversy over the years. Some argue that the Electoral College is outdated and should be replaced with a popular vote system, while others believe that it serves an important purpose in the American political system. The electoral college has lead to fair and democratic elections for over 200 years, removing it would ruin fair elections, lead to less voter participation and could even lead to more corrupt leaders. The Electoral College provides power to small states and swing states.
However, it creates issues like the election result may not truly reflect the public will, even though this does not happen very often. Reflecting the popular will is one of the important criteria for evaluating an electoral method. Therefore, I hold that the Electoral College is not effective enough at the moment and further modifications may be
So, rather than basing the number of the electoral votes in each state according to its number of representatives and senators, the electoral votes would be based on the percentage of the “popular vote won”. Although the proponents of this plan argue that it retains the Electoral College vigor, “the results would be closer to the national popular vote outcome” (Ross, 2004). They also argue that, “the voices of minority voting groups would be reflected in the final election tally because even ballots cast for third-party candidates could be reflected in the national results” (Ross, 2004). Thus, it is also likely to happen that a presidential candidate can win the election without winning the popular but Ross claims that, it will happen less likely than the system that we have in present
Instead, the Electoral College, a voting method based on states’ population, is used to decide the final result. I oppose the Electoral College because of its inefficiency to reflect
In 1787, years after the founding of the United States, the Constitutional Convention met to decide how the new nation would govern itself. The delegates understood that the need for a leader was necessary but still bitterly remembered how Britain abused of its power. The delegates agreed that the President and Vice President should be chosen informally and not based on the direct popular vote, thus gave birth to the Electoral College. The Electoral College is defined as “a body of people representing the states of the US, who formally cast votes for the election of the president and vice president.” Since 1787 the Electoral College has been the system for voting in the United States, but with our nation ever more changing and growing it
To What Extent Should the United States Restructure its Electoral College System? : States With the 2016 election in the books, the United States has elected a candidate that lost the popular vote by over two million votes. This is the second time in the twenty first century that this has occurred. In such a democratic nation, the ability to win the important office of the presidency without popular consent raises a few concerns about the two hundred and forty year old system. In a democracy, the voices of the states and their respective populations must be heard.
The Electoral College system assures balanced power between the states, puts the independent parties under control, grants balanced voting, and supports the major political parties. The Electoral College has proven itself to be very sufficient in determining the president and the vice president of the United States. Since this system has been successful since our Founding Fathers created it, there should be no reason as to why we should get rid of the Electoral