Personal Reflection On Law: A Personal Study Of Law

The first chapter of “Law in America” by Lawrence M. Friedman is an introduction to the formation of the law system that we have in the United States today. The opening of the chapter depicts how Freidman starts his lectures, by reading the front few pages of the local newspaper to his very lethargic students who take his early class. At first, this seems odd given that this is not a political science class or media lecture. However, the logic behind this process is that in every “domestic” article in the news there is a connection to the law. Law is intertwined in almost every situation we face during, not only our day to day lives but also the very structure that forms the environment we live in.

But this shows the book’s central conflict between personal codes of ethics. It makes us question if society’s laws must always be followed and what circumstances garner breaking the rules. I personally believe that when you do not agree that the laws pay respect to everyone’s equal opportunity to live out their own good life, you have the responsibility to change it. Just as Martin Luther King once wrote, “One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws” (Letter).

Law UNIT 2- M1 In this essay I will analyse how law making takes place as well as explaining how Judicial Precedent works. I will in addition talk about delegated legislation as well comparing and contrasting each of these methods. Law making is the process of making rules in order to maintain peace. The main legislative body is Parliament and they make the mains laws for Britain which go through various stages before actually becoming official.

While these are tricky issues to understand at first, this manual will guide you towards what a society should learn and understand just as we Book People have. Individuals should conform to the law when it supports the common good of the people but rebel against the law when it infringes on basic human rights. Conformity leads to a sense of powerlessness,

The writers of the Federalist Papers were supporters of the ratification of the U.S. Constitution. Number 78 is Hamilton’s opinion on how the Judiciary Branch should be chosen and what type of character a judge should be and the relationships between the different courts. Hamilton’s view that the Judiciary Branch be independent, impartial and keep the liberty of the nation, would in fact get true Justices for the people. Hamilton stated that this branch of government is the “least dangerous.” The reason he stated this is because the judicial branch will be there to place judgement and interpretation of the laws created by our legislative branch.

In strain theory, laws are equivalent to the accepted means that people can use to achieve their goals, which are described as a product of tradition and consensus. According to Frederick von Savigny, laws are “generalized statements of the tendencies actually operating, of the presuppositions on which a particular civilization is based” (Hagan 5). In this view, laws are almost indistinguishable from the commonly held morality found in a society. This theory on the nature of laws appears to match Merton’s understanding of how goals and methods of obtaining these goals are formed. An apposing theory on the creation of laws views them as a “product of conflict” (Hagan 5).

In his book, “The Law”, Frederic Bastiat aims to counter the trend in legislation which he identified in France during his life. A legislator himself, Bastiat worried that the scope of the law had expanded far past what was just and thus performed the very acts of greed and plunder which it should aim to prevent. Bastiat based his argument on the idea that the essence of man is found in his personality, liberty, and property. The role of law is to protect these faculties of man, and anything beyond is abuse of power and legal plunder. Bastiat views these elements which comprise man as innate.

Therefore, rules of the law embody public interests and values, criminal justice and social justice do not have the clash in nature. Although the injustice of some individual cases is existent because of the limitation of law, it is essential to guarantee the holiness and authority of law. Otherwise, the improper and irrational acts of public opinions would intervene the judicial process, which may lead to the ‘tyranny of the majority’ (Fleck and Hanssen, 2012). It finally may give rise to that the achievement of justice is just words on a page. Besides, Hayek (2012) argues that the main content of justice is to avoid arbitrariness in the process of exercising power.

After completing a full eight-week course in healthcare law, I believe I am better equipped with competencies and skills that step me above my peers. As this is a self-assessment, I will start by saying that I just realized I missed the last discussion post (week eight). I got mixed up and turned in the final early and then must have been in the Fall semester mindset and forgot, so for that I do apologize. As for the other weeks, I read all the material, pondered on it, and then dove into the discussions and course work. The first assignment, the websites assignment, I sought out a healthcare attorney for his insight.

There are multiple sources of law in the UK. Such as creating sources which refer to Parliamentarians and Judges. Material Sources, for example, Westlaw; Lexis; Law reports and lastly authoritative sources which include Statutes; Judicial precedent/cases. This essay will focus on Judicial Precedent and its importance by discussing firstly, what it consists of, the advantages and disadvantages and finally whether it is the most important source of law. Judicial Precedent is a source of law, in which the court follows a decision that has already been made in a similar case.

However there is an inherent link between legal and ethical emergence of new laws. It can be expected that current ethics will be used in

This information supports my thesis because it explains why everyone has it, why it’s important, and what exactly is Law

1. Explain why it might be difficult to effectively study law following the positive transition. What are the advantages and disadvantages of a humanistic approach to the study of law? Studying law is relatively difficult as the degree holds much of the responsibilities to sort out the issue concerned with the society (ANU, 2014).

The point from which we begin our studies of law it is often observed that law is near always reacting to instances of law breaking and not being a step ahead as far

Legal Perspective of Law Enforcement The legal perspective of law enforcement is a theory in which it is understood that laws act as guidelines on how people should conduct themselves appropriately in society. The legal perspective is a very rule based outlook as it offers punishments for people who are in direct violation of the sets of laws that are emplace. Even though it seems as if this perspective is the bases on how the Justice System is ran presently; many people still consider that there are many flaws concerning this approach. However, it is also deliberated that there are many positive attributes constructed into its system as well.