Murder, as defined by PC:187 of the California Penal Code, is the unlawful killing of a human being, or a fetus, with malice aforethought. On June 13th, 1994, a passerby found Ron Goldman and Nicole Brown dead outside of her condominium in Brentwood California. Immediately, police went to go question ex-husband Orenthal James (O.J.) Simpson. After a long winded and in-depth investigation in which all evidence pointed towards Mr.Simpson as the perpetrator, O.J was found not guilty for two cases of murder in the first degree. One of the most controversial aspects of the case, aside from the celebrity status of the lead suspect, is the large amount of evidence and how it was poorly and improperly handled. This paper is to serve as an in depth analysis of all aspects of the physical evidence found at the scene, and later at O.J.’s house. The origin of the evidence, relation to the crime scene, connection to O.J., and the legalities of the collection and handling of said evidence will all be examined.
A sample of blood was discovered on a pair of O.J. Simpson's socks that were found in his bedroom; after a DNA analysis was conducted, the blood was identified it as Nicole Brown's. Although this seems like substantial evidence, the handling of the evidence comes into
…show more content…
There was about 1.5 mL of blood assumed missing from a vial of blood that was drawn from O.J. Simpson. The Los Angeles Police Department could not counteract the accusation of “lost blood” because there was no solid documentation of the quantity of reference blood that was taken from O.J. as evidence. Out of the 8 mL of blood drawn by the LAPD, approximately 6 mL could be accounted for. In addition, the DNA sample was not immediately submitted as evidence but instead was carried around several hours before it was entered into custody, this now fosters speculation of how and when the 2 mL of blood may have
The two victims were said to have been dead for several hours before being found. At the scene the officers found a single bloody black glove. When arriving at OJ’s house however, the officers noticed a white Ford Bronco with blood in it and on it. When tested the blood on the glove was shown to be both of the victims and that, along with the other evidence, was enough to get an arrest
OJ Simpson OJ Simpson is a former National Football League running back, a actor, broadcaster and even a advertising spokesman, but those weren’t all of the things the former running back was. OJ Simpson was involved in a armed robbery, arrested for kidnapping, charged on multiple cases of assault and was also accused of committing the murder of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ron Goldman. There was a huge shock when OJ Simpson was not found guilty of the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman. The reasons as to why OJ Simpson was not found guilty were the police and detectives not following proper procedures which led to evidence being tampered with. There was also accusations that the detective in charge who was present at all of the crime scenes was racist towards OJ Simpson and involved in changing and tampering with the evidence which made it seem like the defendant, OJ Simpson was guilty.
Thomas Harris once said “I ate his liver with some fava beans and a nice chianti.” There are so many bad things in the world but according to many, cannibalism is considered just about the worst. Depending on your point of view, it rises above even such criminal abominations as, rape and genocide. Jeffrey Dahmer, serial killer and sex offender, murdered 17 males between 1978 and 1991. July 22, 1991 was the day Dahmer's killing spree came to an end.
Anthony Robinson strove all his life to escape the caste system of the ghetto he grew up in. He graduated from a prestigious college and joined the military, only to be falsely identified in a rape case and convicted. He argued many times that he was innocent and was devastated that he ended up in jail, adding to the reputation of those who grow up in the ghetto usually end up in prisons. He had to serve thirteen years in jail before he was paroled able to prove his innocence; he accomplished this with a DNA sample after saving his own money to fund a DNA examination to prove he did not commit the crime and clear his record(1,2). Sadly, Robinson is not the only one who's life was ruined because he was falsely convicted and given no fair trial.
Daniel Gonzalez Mrs. deHart English Apr 17 2023 The O.J Simpson INTRODUCTION The O.J Simpson case was and still is one of the most infamous murder cases of all time. O.J Simpson was a former NFL star and Hall of Famer, although he has some great accolades to his name he is predominantly remembered for being discharged of the murder of Nicole Brown and her best friend Ronald Goldman.
The OJ Simpson Criminal Case (Investigation and Interrogation) Kaitlyn Marie Debrodie CJA 401 August 30, 2014 Professor Nick Tzakis The OJ Simpson Criminal Case (Investigation and Interrogation) The Interrogation of Orenthal James (O. J) Simpson On one faithful night in June of 1994, a gruesome double murder took place.
O.J. Simpson is an ex NFL football player who was put on trial for the murders of his wife Nicole Brown and her boyfriend Ronald Goldman. This trial is one of the most controversial trials ever. It got much attention from everyone who watched it. I think O.J. should have been proven guilty. There are many things that were said and done to show that he was guilty.
However, when the case reached the courtroom there seemed to be minimal focus placed on the actions of O.J. Simpson on June 12, 1994. The trial was deliberately turned into a charade for the entire country to witness; there has never been a spectacle such as the Simpson trial before, and there has not been one since. The defense turned the murder trial into a race riot portraying the lead detective at the crime scene, Mark Fuhrman, as a racist and discrediting the evidence by suggesting he planted it to frame an innocent black man (Bonesteel). The defense did a brilliant job of distracting the jury from the evidence against O.J. and bringing their attention to the racist failures of the LAPD. The spectacle the defense created in the courtroom would not have been necessary unless there was something Simpson was trying to hide regarding his actions on that infamous Sunday morning in
OJ Simpson was a very achieved person player until he made one big mistake. The trial of OJ Simpson was a long stressful process to prove a star innocent or guilty of murder. This took Place in the state of California on October 3, 1995. OJ was tried for a murder crime of his ex-wife and another man. In the end OJ turned out to be not guilty of this crime.
A blood spatter proved in a case study that a teen could not have murdered her parents. In a murder case where an 18-year-old, Sarah Johnson was sentenced to life in prison for committing a first degree murder for both her and dad. The case reopened when a retired crime lab technician Michael Howard “testified that whoever shot Diane and Alan Johnson at close range on September 2, 2003, would have been hit by a "rain" of blood spatter” (http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/03/03/johnson/index.html?eref=sitesearch). Howard came up with his theories proving that, Sarah was not even close in committing those murders and it is a wrongful conviction. Based on blood spatter, Howard disclosed that the shooting which took place was at a very close range and
After only four hours of deliberation, the jury decided that Simpson was not guilty. The case has been described as the most publicized criminal trial in American history. Some people believe that he should have been proven guilty, while others think that he should remain innocent. Five weeks before she was murdered, Nicole makes out her will. Nicole was actually intimidated by O.J.
According to Howard, being in that kind of shooting environment and get no blood on your body is not possible and lab researchers say that there was no blood on Sarah’s clothes. However, there was DNA found on Sarah’s bathrobe which Howard was unaware of and defense prosecutors in return questioned Howard’s creditability. Howard brought up the issue regarding collecting the evidence and also countered defense by questioning on their integrity on the state’s investigations. Howard’s contributions helped in reopening the case
OJ Simpson is Indeed Innocent “If it doesn’t fit, you have to acquit,” this quote said by one of OJ Simpson’s attorneys, Johnny Cochran, is widely known for its impact on the controversial case of OJ Simpson. From 1994-1995 OJ Simpson was known as one of the most controversial cases in the USA due to the verdict that OJ was innocent of the murders of his ex wife and one of her friends. On June 12, 1994 Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman met an untimely demise, and the only suspect the police ever reviewed was OJ Simpson. OJ was later caught in a low speed chase in a white Ford Bronco before being taken into custody and put on trial. In the sensationally controversial court case involving OJ Simpson as a suspect for murder, The innocent ruling
There was multiply evidence that, traced back to O.J. Simpson. His blood was recovered and fingerprints were local on the back fence. Later they found his hair in a knit hat at the crime scene, which the same kind of fiber was found on Goldman’s clothing. Fibers from simpson’s car were also similar to the knit hat. In his vehicle, he had blood from both victims and a pair of bloody socks in his house, along with the right glove that was missing from the crime scene.