Justification Of Gun Control

We need "common" background tests for the reason that there 's a very gigantic loophole in the existing federal regulation that enables detrimental men and women to receive possession of a gun. When the Supreme courtroom ruled that the possession of a gun for personal protection was a constitutional proper underneath the 2d modification, additionally they ruled that a few classes of people might be denied this right. Among the prohibited classes of humans are felons and the significantly mentally in poor health. Nearly everybody has the same opinion that these are confined and reasonable restrictions on the correct to possess a gun.

Throughout history, especially recently, the question of whether gun control violates the 2nd Amendment has been a question which many people claim they know the answer to, but it may not be that transparent. I believe gun control is constitutional, and it deters crime and makes society safer, meaning I side with the pro-gun control ideas. Within the topic of gun control, there are many factors in which people must take into consideration when proposing an answer such as whether it deters crime, what the economic impact is, and what should be changed. NEW PARAGRAPH... Gun control can date way back, but what really made it controversial was the court case of Heller vs DC in 2008.

Not everyone is able to handle a firearm responsibly, and not everyone should have access to all firearms. In the article, The Hard, Simple Truth about Gun Control by Carl T. Bogus writes, “The goal is to devise a system of firearm regulation that allows responsible people to own guns and denies them to irresponsible people”(Bogus 88). One option for gun control is to regulate the sale, purchase and possession of firearms through legislation. This could include measures such as background checks on all gun purchases, restrictions on certain types of firearms, and restrictions on the number of firearms a person can own. Legislation can be effective in reducing gun violence if it is well drafted and properly enforced.

According to Gun Violence Archive (GVA) “as of today there is a total of 27,645 of gun incidents in the United States, of this total, 7,151 are deaths, 14,749 injuries, 319 are children between the ages of 0 to 11 years old, 1,551 are teens between the ages of 12 to 17, 179 of this incidents correspond to a number of mass shootings, 171 are officers that were either killed or injured, 960 were individuals involved with crime, 1,160 due to home invasion, only 849 are use in defense and 1,179 correspond to accidental” (Gun Violence Archive, 1). Due to high numbers on statistics regarding gun violence a lot of people wonder if by giving the right to people to keep arms is keeping them safe or turning them into a menace to society. Some people believe that gun control will not deter crime and it will prevent citizens from protecting themselves. However, some other individuals believe that gun control will reduce gun

Why take away the protection and recreational shooting practices of innocent citizens because others are irresponsible? Gun control laws are a major issue being discussed in the U.S. right now. Some believe that by condemning the availability of firearms to all, criminals and people with mental illnesses will be less likely to attain firearms. However they are then violating the people’s second amendment right, which give them the right to bear arms. According to the article on “Gun Control Laws” from the Issues and Controversies database, It all started on “June 12, 2016, when a gunman killed 49 at a gay nightclub in Orlando Florida.”

A controversy that has arisen over the years is gun control, who has the right to have access to guns and how gun control and access tie into violent crimes. After a tragedy, politicians come together to debate gun control policies proposed in response to a shooting. Many people blamed the gun, not the person. Mental health is serious issue, because it leads to a negative public attitude toward person with serious mental illness. However, despite the claims of gun control activists, gun control does not reduce crime; it only leaves law abiding citizens increasingly vulnerable to violent crime, and need to use mental health screening before purchasing a gun/guns.

Gun control is and will be beneficial to America’s security and safety. The US has been seen to be drastically more unsafe than other countries with stronger gun laws. “Gun violence is a crisis. 117,000 Americans are shot every year, a rate that outpaces our peer by order of magnitude” (Gun Laws Matter).

A stronger focus on gun control in the United States involving restriction or even an outright ban of guns could serve to help the problem greatly. In 2015, 13,286 people were killed by firearms in the United States, with 26,819 suffering from non-lethal injuries (qtd. in “Guns in the US”). Taking away guns, the means that many urban criminals have to commit their crimes, would be very beneficial to cities. Recent studies found that the most effective way of reducing gun crime is to lower the amount of guns available in circulation.

The second amendment states that “a well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free country the right to bare arms. there are plenty of reasons why there shouldn't be more gun control laws. guns don't deter crimes gun owners do, and how people supposed to defend themselves with all these gun control laws it's hard enough we don't need to make it harder. People say that guns cause crimes but they are wrong the gun can't do anything but the owner can.

Although guns have been used to harm, injure, and kill our fellow brothers and sisters, gun control laws should not be enacted. Gun laws are the regulation of the selling, owning, and use of guns. We as a nation are built on the freedom of not being controlled by the government. When more and more gun laws are enacted, more and more of our freedom is taken away. Slowly our nation will crumble and fall beneath us.

Gun control is what restricts people from buying and using guns, but these laws are not strengthened at the extent they need to be strengthened. This leads to many people getting these guns and using them to cause mass shootings all over the U.S. For example, according to the Council on Foreign Relationship, a news article that covers major world issues, in 2017, mass shootings at a music festival in Las Vegas and at a church near San Antonio have rekindled the gun control debate (“U.S. Gun Policy: Global Comparisons”). The fact that gun control is still not tightened is a huge margin and error, and still causes mass shootings as we just covered. Many people have said that we should not allow guns to be purchased, which would seem like the logical option. However, according to the same source, Council on Foreign Relationship, some states, such as Idaho, Alaska, and Kansas, have passed various laws attempting to nullify

From the founding of the United States of America up until modern times there has been an estrangement regarding gun control laws. According to the article(Americans want strict gun laws) published by CNN by Eric Brandermore than half of the U.S wants stricter gun laws. Others think that bearing arms is part of their rights. While opponents of these laws typically cite gun control measures as an infringement on the right to bear weapons, supporters support that the Second Amendment does not limit the government from modifying the proliferation of firearms in the United States.

Gun control, in addition to be hypocritical, also contradicts the protection of human lives. For instance when looking at the argument for gun control it comes down to this: every human life is valuable, killing someone is immoral, guns can kill people, so create laws that decrease access to weapons. Gun control activist strive to push that guns are one of the main causes for death in the

Moreover, if the ownership of guns is limited, it will help prevent unnecessary deaths and violence caused by gun owners, especially students. Gun ownership should be totally controlled and regulated by the government because they will help in limiting the number of people who own guns. When gun

Body I. First constructive argument: Banning the private ownership of guns will reduce the number of deaths due to gun violence. A. Kleck (2009) argues that the private ownership of guns enables the occurrence of deadly mass shootings at school or in the workplace. 1. The distribution of privately owned firearms provides easy access to firearms and makes deadly mass shootings possible. 2.