Joe Atkins's Argument Against The Death Penalty

The murderers, rapists, and others bring about all those emotions. The anger, sadness, and fear that comes with losing someone or having to imagine what they went through. Some people believe that life in prison is good enough for those felons; where they sustain free food, clothes, water, showers. All those supplies that taxpayers are paying for, the stuff that the victims family is aiding in paying for. Does it seem fair to let those people live with what they have done when they probably don't even feel guilt?

The death penalty should be allowed. As the quote goes “you can’t do the time, don’t do the crime”. Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, is a government sanctioned practice where a person is put to death by the state as a punishment for a crime. Over 1,436 people were executed in the U.S from 1977 through May 2016, by lethal injection. Most death penalty

thing as murder. The definition of murder is deliberate and illegal killing of a person or to commit the crime of killing them deliberately according to the Collins. Capital punishment, however, is not illegal killing, nor crime. There is a stern reason to sentence death penalty, which is to protect the society from any more harm from the criminal, and many other reasons. Such reasons were deeply and continuously revised, and it cannot be classified as a murder.

Recently, Interviewers have been asking Mark Klaas how he feels if California uses the death penalty on Richard Allen Davis, the man who kidnapped, messes with, and killed Klaas’ 12 year old daughter in 1993. A jury found Davis guilty and killed him in 1996.(Saunders) This shows that the death penalty is being used in the wrong way. Executors should not be asking people if they think someone should be killed. It turns out the Canadian Coalition Against the Death Penalty hosts a Richard Allen Davis home page, on which the convicted killer displays "hand-painted wood hobby craft items," which he made, and posts photos of himself.

Deadly Justice For most of recorded history, the death penalty has been regarded as a barbaric and brutal form of punishment. The United States Federal Government should outlaw the use of the death penalty. Eliminating the death penalty is justified because it does not deter crime; it generates higher expenses, violates human rights, and puts innocent lives at risk. Death penalty does not prevent crime; delinquency rates are usually higher in states with the death penalty.

In conclusion, keeping the death penalty would greatly benefit society and the innocent lives living in it. Against the Death Penalty Despite the sound reasoning of those who are pro death penalty, it does not prevent the opposing side from sticking by their reasonings. So on the other hand, those who are against the death penalty feel it isn't as effective as other options, when the state kills it puts guilt on all of us, homicide rates increase after executions, and it has various mental effects on those involved. Similar to the latter how sound the reasoning is of those with this opinion can be argued.

Therefore, the death penalty should remain an option of punishment. There are many reasons why the death penalty is effective, one of them includes the fact that it brings a sense of security to the victims and citizens. Ny Times claims that “It is the only 100% guarantee that the criminal

Some people who were put to death were falsely accused for someone else's crime. If they wouldn’t have been killed we could have known that it wasn’t them who did the crime, but since they died, there is no way to justify this. There was no way of apologizing to the deceased family's for a wrong doing. The death penalty also gives some of the worst offenders publicity that they do not deserve or need. They get to speak about their beliefs, religion, and their crimes.

The idea of putting a human to death sentence is harsh as much as they deserve it there are a couple of things the government should look at before continuing the death penalty as a punishment. There are arguments that start about being against the death penalty. First is there an error being made with the prosecution have we thought that made the person is innocent? Secondly, we citizens pay more for death penalty; state departments could be saving 2.3 million if we eliminated the death penalty. Lastly, there is an alternative to keeping criminals from the streets by sentencing life without parole; the suspect if being a murderer molester etc.

The death penalty should not be legal in any form and is unconstitutional in every possible way. It is randomly selected and very often, it is racially biased. There are many reasons why the death penalty should be illegal, such as innocent people being put on death row, the fact that the death penalty does not make crime rates lower, and the death penalty could be considered unconstitutional. Since the reinstatement of the death penalty in 1976, over 138 innocent men and women have been released from death row.

I believe that the death penalty should still be used as a capital punishment. For the fact because anyone who does anytime of cruel damage should pay the consequences for their actions. Yes it may cost taxpayers money but it gives people justice for people who did a horrific event, for example the terrorist attack on 9/11 or the Boston Marathon. Those were all horrible people who knew what they were doing and they knew that death was going to follow them wherever they went. Bad people don’t deserve to sit in a cell and eat food or even breath of all the death and pain and grief they have caused people.

There are some states where the death penalty or also known as capital punishment doesn’t exist, in that case is where, life without parole is their sentence. This is putting them on prison, keeping them from society, it’s almost just as bad as death penalty. There are many opinions about the death penalty, opinions like it being inhumane, or cruel and painful. Whatever the circumstance, there is a high percentage of inmates that get sentenced or put on death row, and they don’t even see the chamber. Mostly because the death rate is low in a lot of states.

Should The Death Penalty be legal? Thousands of people on Death Row have been put on for cold-blooded-murder. So this raises the question - Should the Death Penalty be legal? Yes it should there are several reasons why: One: The victims parents/family want justice for the crime,

The death penalty may seem like a great idea, But were you aware that it’s available in 30 states. The killing of a criminal is something that is permitted by the government and that is a good thing. Here's why i think this i've done some research on why the death penalty should be legal thing in all states and countries. Cause if you had went to court and the judge told you that you were gonna be sent to death row then later death penalty I mean someone else telling you what’s gonna happen to your life and how to live it.

The death penalty allows the u.s to do something about people who do evil crimes instead of watching and not do anything about it. Although the death penalty cost a lot of money, the death penalty should be legal in the u.s. The death penalty was first used in colonial times the death penalty has had many struggles. It was not allowed because it was cruel and unusual punishment but then it was allowed again only in some forms like the lethal injection, the gas chamber, electrocution, hanging, and firing squad.