Deadly Justice For most of recorded history, the death penalty has been regarded as a barbaric and brutal form of punishment. The United States Federal Government should outlaw the use of the death penalty. Eliminating the death penalty is justified because it does not deter crime; it generates higher expenses, violates human rights, and puts innocent lives at risk. Death penalty does not prevent crime; delinquency rates are usually higher in states with the death penalty. In addition, capital punishment is much more expensive than life in prison. Death row infringes on a person’s right to life. About 108 people in 25 states have been proven innocent after they were out to death sentence. Thus, an ethical judicial system should be concerned …show more content…
In fact, states that perform the death penalty have higher murder rates than states that do not have a death sentence statute. As of now, there are 18 states that have outlawed death row. Those states have the least amount of murder rate ranking lower than average. The Times magazine discovered that in past 20 years, states with the death sentence have ranked crime rate 48 percent to 101 percent higher than in states that have the form of punishment banned. The 18 states that have not enacted to the death penalty believe that abolishing it was the best alternative. "I think Michigan made a wise decision 150 years ago," claims John Engler, the state governor. Michigan prohibited the death penalty in 1846 and has withstood any kind of attempts to reestablish it. As it’s known, the majority of convicts who have been sentenced to death penalty have executed their crimes due to mental instability or under the effects of narcotics and alcohol. This portrays a category of people who are impotent of making any logical choice due to their lack of self- control. The death Penalty will never stop a convict from committing a felony because they don’t see death sentence as a possible consequence for their …show more content…
Some people believe death penalty should be used as a punishment for taking a life. They argue that it is deterrent and reduces crime. Other people believe that some criminals will never change. If a criminal slaughtered twenty people without any logical reason chances they will execute the same crime again. No cell time will change that. To them, death penalty is not murder but is rather a justified punishment for someone that has committed a crime. “May the punishment fit the crime.” is one of the most fitting meanings for justice. An inclination for justice is one of the most inborn attributes of most humans. For the purpose of stability of this constitution fairness and morality must always subsist and the removal of these criminals who violate safety is required. Those who reinforce death sentence comprehend that there is no better form of punishment than death
The death penalty should be passed in each state because it would give the victims family relief, it would provide a safer environment, and it would make everyone realize the value of life. My first reason to pass the death penalty is for the families of the victims that want the criminal get what he/she deserves for committing the murder of their loved ones. These family fights to get the justice for their loved one
There have been many controversies on the topic of capital punishment and its role within society. It is not likely that there will ever be a unified view on this topic. One of the first reasons why the death penalty should never be imposed is because of the possibility of killing an innocent person. True enough the DNA technology has decreased this probability but due to administrative bias innocent people can still be killed. There is no retribution for a dead man who was wrongly put to death.
The death penalty is a highly debated part of American society. But does society’s view on the death penalty have more to do with the violence that surrounds us or personal experiences with it? This view on the death penalty is invalid seeing as a person’s views on the death penalty has more to do with morals and ethics. The death penalty has both pros and cons.
Today capital punishment is much different. The punishment is now exclusively for the crime of murder. It is meant to provide closure to victims families, justice, and deter people from commiting murder. Theses goals do not rationalise the negatives. The United States should abolish the death penalty because it is cruel and unnecessary, extremely costly, and has not proven as effective deterrent of decreasing crime.
The fact that most criminals who have been sentenced to death appeal for life imprisonment, itself shows that they fear death more than life in prison”. As long as the criminal is still alive, they are still capable of killing or hurting someone . Putting a criminal in prison makes the government look more sympathetic towards the criminal than the victim. The government needs to send out a strong message that they will not tolerate such crimes and they won't let them get away with it, prison time is enough to stop most people, but for some people a stronger reason is needed. Having a functional death penalty law will help protect the public from society’s worst
Today many old issues are being raised again about how and who the penalty is carried out on. Only 32 states in the United States still use the death penalty, other states have banned it for various reasons. One of those reasons is because the amount of money it costs to execute an inmate sometimes costs more than it would to just give them life imprisonment. Another reason is because the process of capital punishment can take up to fifteen years; so many states would rather just give life sentences than have to go through that. Even though there are reasons to ban the death penalty, there are reasons to keep it
Introduction: Capital punishment has been a criminal sentence imposed in America since colonial times. During this particular time period, the penalty was used for different crimes that went against the social norms, such as horse stealing, rape, burglary, and slave rebellion. Today the death sentence is strictly used in murder cases and in thirty-two out of the fifty states and by the federal system in the United States. In these states, it is completely legal to use the ultimate punishment of death to incapacitate a criminal from committing any further harm to society (Marcus, 2007). Throughout American history, many individuals have supported the death penalty because they believe it is an effective way to deter crime.
While in class may groups discussed abolishing the death penalty entirely due to the recurring mistakes that are made during convention process. These groups classified the value being put in jeopardy as an individual's right to life, which goes against a utilitarianist view. A common argument relied on a utilitarianist view, with the thought that a life in prison instead of the death penalty would increase the overall happiness of society. I tend to disagree with the totality of this argument. Instead of doing away with this punishment altogether, society needs to practice it less frequently and give more resources to the judicial system.
“Unless that balance is restored, society succumbs to a rule of violence. Only the taking of the murderer’s life restores the balance and allows society to show convincingly that murder is an intolerable crime which will be punished in kind.” (“Retribution (In Support of the Death Penalty)”). Without punishing the person who committed murder, the citizens are more likely to take the matter into their own hands. They will give the murderer a punishment they think he deserves.
Death penalty is like the ‘’tooth for a tooth – eye for an eye’’ theory. Instead of acting inhuman to our fellow beings we should find a better way to solve the mind of criminals. Making the problem vanish is not a good idea. We should do psychological researching instead! I, myself have a lot of faith in humanity.
The major reason why the death penalty should be abolished is that the cost of the death penalty is too much and the USA is in debt to many other countries. What this means is that the death penalty should be abolished and also the cost death penalty is more than the cost of maximum sentence life in prison. According to J. Marceau and H. Whitson, “The Cost of Colorado’s Death penalty,” 3 Univ. of Denver Criminal Law Review “A new study of the cost of the death penalty in Colorado revealed that capital proceedings require six times more days in court and
Capital Punishment should be outlawed because it puts innocent lives at risk, bad representation, and there are other alternatives. The wrongful execution of an innocent person is an injustice that can never be rectified. Since the reinstatement of the death penalty, more than 150 men and women have been released from Death Row nationally, and some
Allowing the guilty a second chance at life is something that is unacceptable and depriving the innocent victims involved of their reprisal. The death penalty solves this and provides an appropriate punishment. The benefits far outweigh the disadvantages therefore the death penalty should be implemented in the world to create a solution to these abhorrent crimes. This subject has continually rested in the minds of people and in many conversations everywhere in bad light.
The death penalty by the State institutionalizes the death penalty that already exists on the part of criminals, therefore when the state decides to kill, takes on a right that denies its citizens. Consequently, the death penalty is a contradiction by the State. Also, the death penalty is not effective because it does not reduce crime. The criminal does not think about the consequence ate the time of committing the crime; proof is that he commits his crimes thinking that will not be punished. As said by a police lieutenant in Kansas, "I have never heard a murderer say they thought about the death penalty as consequence of their actions prior to committing their crimes."
The punishment of execution is a sensitive law and there is no choice to revoke it or reform it because the spirit of man can not be returned. Moreover, the punishment of death does constitute a violation of one's rights to life, which is the most basic human