Jane Roberts Case Summary

Case Citation: Linda Williamson v. The City of Houston, 148 F. 3d 462 (5th Cir. 1998). Facts: Houston Police Officer Linda Williamson was working in the Organized Crime Squad and was sometimes assigned to partner with fellow Officer Doug McLeod. Williamson alleged that over an eighteen month period, McLeod harassed her every day creating a hostile work environment. More specifically, Williamson stated that McLeod conducted obvious and demeaning inspections of her appearance. He made comments to her on how her body looked in different clothes and remarked specifically on the appearance of her buttocks and the size of her breasts.

The case study describes about the tragic incident of Dorothy J.Drury, who died from injuries sustained in a fall while living at an Assisted Living Concepts , Inc. Drury had signed a Residency Agreement when his mother moved into the home, though he was not then his mother’s guardian, conservator, personal representative, or trustee and he did not have power of attorney for her. Drury’s mother suffered from dementia, chronic confusion, and memory impairment. The Residency Agreement included an arbitration provision. Drury sued ALC for wrongful death, in ALC defense they moved to compel arbitration, but the trial court denied the motion.

Indigenous Prisoner, Vickie Lee Roach brought a High Court case that could’ve secured a historic right to vote for 20,000 of Australia's prisoners. Roach was not triumphant in her endeavour to win back her right, and many others rights, to vote, as decided by a High Court Justice in yesterday's trial. However, this trial has become a landmark case. After receiving 125 convictions and 23 court appearances, Roach was imprisoned for reckless driving in 2004 after a police pursuit and seriously injuring the driver of another vehicle.

CASE Linda Williamson v. The City of Houston Citation LINDA WILLIAMSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus THE CITY OF HOUSTON, TEXAS; Al, Defendants, versus THE CITY OF HOUSTON< TEXAS Defendant-Appellant. No. 896-21110 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT 148 F.3d 462, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 16771; 77 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas.

Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, Larry Offutt (“Offutt”), appellant, was convicted of robbery with a dangerous weapon, attempted robbery with a dangerous weapon, and related charges. On appeal, Austin presents three questions for our review, which we have rephrased as follows: 1. Whether the trial court erred by limiting cross-examination of a state’s witness regarding her involvement in an unrelated offense. 2. Whether the trial court erred in overruling an objection to the prosecutor’s statements on the grounds that the statements impermissibly shift the burden of proof to the defense.

Shane’s assessment was corroborated by descriptions of battered woman syndrome in various forms of literature, helping the jury understand the extent of Lavallee’s mental state that was affected by the abuse and the reasons for her action. After reviewing the evidence, the Court stated that “ Expert testimony is admissible to assist the fact-finder in drawing inferences in areas where the expert has relevant knowledge or experience beyond that of the lay person” (R v. Lavallee, [1990] 1 SCR 852), because this applied to the jury’s process in deciding, by allowing them to understand the components of battered woman syndrome. Furthermore, a new trial would be unnecessary because the Court reasoned that both the jury and the trial judge were presented with enough admissible evidence to know that Lavallee was battered repeatedly and brutally by Rust throughout their relationship.

MILLERSBURG — Two brothers serving a 14-month prison sentence were free men, for the most part, after Holmes County Common Pleas Judge Robert Rinfret granted both judicial release Wednesday. In December, Dennis Carl Bevington, 55, and Gary Lee Bevington, 62, both of 833 Depot St., pleaded guilty in Holmes County Common Pleas Court to failure to provide for a functionally impaired person. In exchange for their pleas, the more serious charges of involuntary manslaughter were dismissed. They could have faced 11 years in prison.

Case Name: Andrea v Clarence To determine if the arrest of Clarence was lawful, one must first determine if the police officers were trespassing at the time of the arrest. Did the police officers trespass on another ’s land in order to arrest Clarence? The police officers would be found to have trespassed if it was established that; • The action was direct and intentional • The police officers entered and/or remained on another’s land • The police officers were present on the land without consent or lawful justification

On October 2011, in Roane County near Knoxville, a passing driver discovers a body near the side of the rural road. After the call to 911, which starts the criminal justice process, the police rushed to the scene to discover that the body belonged to 23-year-old Brooke Morris. She was murdered, and the Dateline episode, Nightfall documents the investigation and outcome of Brooke’s murder. Brooke was a victim of more than one violent crime. It led to her murder, but it also led investigators to catching her killer.

The disappearance of Susan Cox Powell is a case full of dark, shocking twists that may reveal what happened to her. At a young age, Susan Cox met and married Josh Powell. The couple moved from their small town in Washington to another in Utah, and proceeded to have two children: Charlie and Braden Powell. On December 7, 2009, the boys did not show up to daycare. Worried, a worker at the daycare called the Powells, and then later the police.

They say that it is better that ten guilty men go free then one innocent man be wrongly convicted. On a 60 Minute broadcast, reporter Lesley Stahl did a story regarding the wrongful imprisonment of an innocent man based off of a rape victim’s eyewitness identification. The man convicted of the crime was sentenced to life plus fifty years at the age of twenty-two for a crime he never committed. Eleven years later, his innocence was finally proven when DNA was able to exonerate and clear his name.

Sem_1 DB#2 QUESTION: What key information will you need to learn in your interview with the client? To collect key information and learn about the client’s situation, it would be important to ask the following questions. Basic Information: • What is your purpose of preparing a prenuptial agreement?

The efficacy of appropriate treatment for addiction disorder and substance abuse may be determine by drug and alcohol counselors, primary healthcare providers, social workers, and others. Therefore, it is necessary for competent and those properly trained to utilize the necessary tools needed for proper assessments, diagnosis, treatment planning and future referrals. Careful selection on these instruments may be influenced by cultural, race, and gender (Van Wormer & Davis, 2018). Furthermore, counselors or other clinicians would also need to consider the reliability and validity these instruments prior to selection.

This is to ensure that a particular issue is not a pseudo problem perceived as dilemma by the client. When an issue is agreed as a problem, the next step would be to identify the nature of it. Is it an ethical, moral, legal, professional or clinical? It is also possible that it may be of multiple in nature. Issues involving ethics are not easy and often complicated.

The counsellor gathers information to understand the client’s problem and how it affects the client and his environment. The counsellor will also explore on the factors that probably cause the problem and aspects which may relieve it. Lastly, the information gathered is to assist the counsellor to know the client’s understanding of the presenting problem and efforts to resolve the