How Saladin Impacted The Crusades

From the years 1095-1099 Crusaders set out on a march to the Holy Land. It was poorly organized due to the fact that four different leaders along with Peter the Hermit and his People’s Crusade came together to battle against the Muslims and Jews. Big battles Crusades were forced to take on where: Battle for Nicaea, Dorylaum, Antioch, Herenc, Jerusalem and many others along the way. Four key leaders; Godfrey of Bouillon, Raymond of Saint Gilles, Bohemond of Taranto and Hugh of Vermandois, brought different tactics to how they were going to take on different battles creating a difficult course for defenders. The First Crusade was a battle for Christianity to be the dominate religion and it was a turning point in European history, starting a series of Crusades to

In my opinion, I believe that the Crusades came about due to political greed and the need for power. I think sometimes it is seen as a serious of religious campaigns, but I don 't believe any religion would truly influence military battles to conquer the lands of other peoples, to me, that is the desire of power and greed. The First Crusade was called by Pope Urban II in 1905, which started as a "pilgrimage" then ended as a military expedition by Roman Catholic Europe to conquer the Holy Lands, which were originally taken by the Muslim conquests of the Levant. This began with Emperor Alexios sent an ambassador to the pope requesting military support, in which Pope Urban II, requested Catholic volunteers (Using religious beliefs to attract people

The Crusades are several wars that went on between the Muslims and the Christians They fought for Jerusalem. Most of the wars took place in Jerusalem. Were the results of the Crusades more positive of negative? I think the results were more negative. One reason being the people that the Christians hired turned their backs on them.

Introduction: Provide background information on the Crusades, restate the DBQ question, state thesis with reasons. (include academic vocabulary and underline) The results of the Crusades was probably more negative than positive. In “Doc 4”, It states that “Moreover, the assault of one Christian people on another, when one of the goals of the Fourth Crusade was reunion of Greek and Latin churches, made the split between the Greek and Latin churches permanent.” The Crusades had a lot of hatred to the religions, and by 1204 the Crusaders had lost some of their appeal because the knights agreed to attack the Byzantine Capital instead.

Some of the benefits a of the crusades can be a positive but mostly negative. Document five states that they were many battles between the colonies and some traded along the ways of the movement between the countries. This is relevant because even though there were some of the positive impacts,they were still other things that made it incomparable between them. Document seven,it states that the crusades were hard to maintain and often abused christians and jews.

During the Middle Ages, the church played an integral role in the lives of individuals. This is best demonstrated by the crusades, where an individual would have traveled to the Holy Land to secure the salvation of one 's ' soul by fighting the barbarians. Relics became connected to this practice, as the crusade acted as an alternative to a pilgrimage. One can observe the power relics had over individuals in the political sphere, as people would swear on them to make decisions, they upheld honor and commitment in war, and ultimately create a cycle of obtaining even more relics. Relics were widely sought-after commodities in the Middle Ages.

They turned to him for a holy war against the Christians and knew that as an extremely devout Muslim he would accommodate their desires and despite this he was still of a kindred heart. He brought about the Third Crusade by capturing the Holy City of Jerusalem in the year 1187. Saladin utilised his influence as a Sultan and united the Muslims of Syria to march against the Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem. His force was met with an opposing Christian army in what is known as the Battle of Hattin and the conflicting forces battled it out by the Sea of Galilee with the Muslims eventually emerging victorious due to the routing of the Christian army and consecutive capture of their king - Guy of Lusignan.

The crusades started in 1095. The crusades was not a long, huge war, it was 9 battles. The crusades was two religions fighting each other for the Holy Land. Those two religions were the Muslims and the Christians. Were the results of the crusades more negative or positive?

With the goal of reconquering the Holy Lands of the Middle East, many Western Europeans supported a series of military conquests called the Crusades. As seen in the documents the religious figures who supported the Crusades had an idealized vision of the unification and religious zeal the Crusades would bring to the Christian faith, but for many of the actual crusaders, the cause of the crusades was a hope for economic gain through pillage. Although one of the original causes of the Crusades, according to religious figures, was to support the Byzantines and perhaps reunify the Eastern and Western churches, they resulted in increased feelings of tension in the Christian churches and actually aided creating a closer connection between different

In 1189 the 3rd Crusade, also known as The Kings’ Crusade, began. This was an attempt by European leaders to regain the Holy Land from Saladin. England, France, and the Roman Empire were to go against The Byzantine Empire, the Empire of Cyprus and Saladin to recapture Jerusalem. The Crusade was based mainly around Levant and Anatolia. The 3rd Crusade ended in 1192 with the Muslims still having control of Jerusalem.

Ultimately the group of wars known as the Crusades achieved very little gain for the Christian forces, other than a series of "own-goals" (such as the sacking of Byzantium). So, despite a few short-term gains, the ultimate "winners" were the Muslim forces. Persia at the time was part of the Seljuk Empire I believe and therefore was certainly a supporter of the Muslim forces during this

Looking at a wider perspective, when the Christians had taken over Jerusalem from the Muslims, the Islamic leader was urging his people to retake what they believed was rightfully theirs. The quote “God has received nothing from us in the way of adoration” illustrates how the Muslims wanted to demonstrate religious devotion to their God. As time went on, losing the Holy Land would be too shameful for Christendom, so with the Pope’s blessing, dozen of thousands of men marched toward Jerusalem. It is visible that the Crusades were primarily caused by religious devotion. Popes had used the Crusades as a tool in order to achieve and fulfil religious, political and economic aspects.

The Crusades were successful failures because they did not meet many of their goals, but left lasting effects. The Crusades was an attempt by the Roman Catholic Church to regain the Holy Lands from the Muslims. They believed they were fighting for god and all sins would be forgiven and defend the Byzantine Empire from the Turks. The first Crusade (1096 -1099) was successful for the Christians because they had a clear and organized religious based purpose. Crusaders the Christian armies were able to hold Jerusalem and in the process led to a massacre of Jews.

Topic: What were the causes of the First Crusade? In the 900s Byzantium was powerful until Seljuk Turks came and invade their territories like Syria. The ongoing problems and the wars between the Byzantine and Seljuk Turks made angry the Byzantine Emperor Alexius I since he cannot cope with the Seljuks. With the increasing power of the Seljuk Turks, Byzantine Emperor Alexius I Comnenus sent a delegation to the Papuaienza in Italy and asked Pope Urban II help them against the Turks.

In 1204, the Crusaders and Venetians attacked Constantinople and sacked the city. Not getting payed infuriated the Crusaders. In 1193 CE, Saladin died because of yellow fever. After his death, Ayyubid took control of Jerusalem.