How Did James Madison Establish A Republican Form Of Government?

James Madison’s Federalist 10 was written amid criticisms that a republican form of government had never been successful on a large scale. Madison’s argument was that a well-constructed union could control factions. He argued that in order to control factions from their causes, we would need to either give up liberty or free thought. Since we cannot infringe upon these two natural rights, we must move on to controlling the effects. A republic, Madison argues, would be able to do this because the people choose the representatives, and they choose representatives who they feel best represent their opinions.

“Richard Henry Lee’s Objection to the Constitution” and James Madison’s “The Federalist No. 51” contend about the positive and negative effects of the Constitution. Both essays are important documents for early American history, and both contain valid points. James Madison, however, presents the better argument with his diplomatic, content, and logical approach. “The Federalist No. 51” begins with a question about how America can properly divide government power (Madison 1). Madison believes the Constitution is the answer because it gives the foundations and tools to keeping the power of the government for the people.

In part, he was afraid of this economic factions would come together to undermine the government and further their interests. He writes, for example, that should those without property become a faction they might begin efforts to redistribute wealth. He writes that such a faction may well become 'an interested and overbearing majority.' Madison concludes the introductory section of the article declaring that because factionalism cannot be kerbed, it must be controlled.

Prior to the ratification of the United States Constitution, a series of eighty-five essays, later compiled and published as The Federalist Papers, were written under the joint pseudonym “Publius” by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay. In these essays, the three men expressed support for ratification by explaining the meaning and virtues of the Constitution (Brinkley, 139). Although, it did not receive such fame until the early twentieth-century, Madison’s Federalist No. 10 has since been regarded as one of the more prominent Federalist papers (Adair, 48). In it, Madison presents the argument that the new republican government under the Constitution would be better able to deal with the problems that arise from factions. This paper

He knew that if people were left to their own devices to come up with legislation on how to rule the community as a whole then it would result in legislation that was self-interested and somehow promoted personal gains. It was in this form of thinking that in the Federalist Papers #51 Madison said that the checks and balances are needed in order to control the government from becoming despotic. Therefore, checks and balances were as such a direct reflection on human nature and our pursuit for the passions rather than reason or logic. (Hamilton, Madison, & Jay, 1961, p. 318) It is here that Madison proposes his grand theory.

Labunski starts by taking us to the Philadelphia Convention where Madison recorded the convention proceedings extended periods of time every day, noting every vote and discussion. Surprisingly, Labunski barely remarks on Madison’s role in the writing of several of the Federalist Papers, instead he focused on Madison’s exchange with Patrick Henry at Virginia’s ratifying convention and his pivotal role in that convention. Madison initially believed that the amendments on personal liberties were unnecessary because the Constitution in the form it was written, gave very few rights to the federal government. However, he and a few others argued that by specifying individual rights, that would imply that the federal government would receive the authority to all other personal rights.

In the Federalist No. 10, James Madison suggests the establishment of the republic and introduces the separation of powers. Now, with these two points, Madison’s explains how having a republic would be effective because with the large number of representatives now in place it would establish qualified people to serve for the good of America. As well with the separation of powers, it would introduce a system of checks of balances within the government, because before there was only one branch, the legislative, and there was no form of checking if whether they were being just. With the powers divided it would reduce factions and any type of corruption would be limited. With these improvements it would make the government more efficient than before.

Outline on Federalist No. 10 • The instability, injustice and confusion in public council are the mortal diseases in popular governments. • James Madison tells us that valuable improvement made by constitution on the popular models for both ancient and modern cannot certainly admired, but they have effectually obviated the danger. • Madison gave the explanation about complaints heard from citizens on unstable government and measures decided by superior force of interest or major parties, but not by justice and rights of minor parties. • Factions are group of people who are against the government and get united for common impulse and adverse to the rights of other citizens or permanent and aggregated interests of the community. • Madison tells

10 in an attempt to ratify the Constitution, the new form of government for the United States. In the Federalist Paper No. 10, Madison analyzed the way to deal with facts, made a comparison between a pure democracy and a republic, and made another comparison on whether a small government or a large government would be the best for America. He informed the people that there is not a way to completely get rid of factions, but there are ways to deal with them. One great way to deal with factions is by having a government that knows how to control and deal with their effects. Madison believes that a republic can do that job better than a democracy, because a democracy is a small society of people who can not admit there is a cure to factions.

Madison thought that the government needed a better form of money income for the government, so he had created the system of checks and balances. Checks and balances are designed so that the power in the government is separated between different branches specifically designed so that one branch does not have too much power over other forms of government and the people. He had made it so that the constitution specifically states what powers each branch has, this way the branches are unable to take too much power and overcome the government. Having the checks and balances gives each department their own field so that others don’t impinge on their decisions creating conflict in the governmental

In the case of taxation, the more powerful of the two parties would have the opportunity to impose higher taxes on the minority, thus, saving themselves money. Madison firmly believed that the constitution had the ability to solve the problems created by factions. Madison envisioned a large republic that would make it difficult for corrupt candidates to get elected. Madison expressed this by stating, In the next place, as each representative will be chosen by a greater number of citizens in the large than in the small republic, it will be more difficult for unworthy candidates to practice with success the vicious arts by which elections are too often carried; and the suffrages of the people being more free, will be more likely to centre in men who possess the most attractive merit and the most diffusive and established characters.

Madison’s two writings, Property and his Third Note, both had overlapping themes. Each of Madison’s writings were concerned with what defines property and how the definition of it should define how Americans interpret the Constitution. For this assignment, each article will be summarized and interpreted independently before a final interpretation of their significance in unison. In Madison’s earlier paper, Property, it is easy to deduce that some of the in Third Note were in their early development stages. Madison’s Property defined what the term “property” meant to him.

Madison’s essay reflects the fear many had of a tyrannical government and the desire to ensure that the country didn’t revert back to that which it had just escaped from. He notes the necessity to prevent any one faction or group from gaining too much power and oppressing those in the minority. The separation of powers was set in place to ensure that this could not happen. Even if one group decides they want something, the other two have the equal authority to prevent it should it not represent the country as a whole.

The Convention understands the sacrifice Americans made in the Revolutionary War, but waiting around for a perfect Constitution posed a greater threat to the people’s unalienable rights than what the antifederalists feared: a hasty

James Madison was the fourth president of the United States, but he's most likely best known as "the father of the Constitution" who helped bring America the Bill of Rights. In his biography of the diminutive statesman, Richard Brookhiser argues that Madison was more than that — he was also the father of American politics. Madison co-founded what was then called the Republican Party (the precursor to today's Democratic Party) and was one of the first Americans to notice — and harness — the power of public opinion. While some books about the founding fathers tend toward hagiography, Brookhiser's portrait of Madison is fair-minded but sometimes critical — he takes a somewhat dim view of Madison's two-term presidency, but still treats his subject