How Did Andrew Jackson A Corrupt Bargain

“The Birth of Modern Politics” is about the 1828 presidential election, which pitted Andrew Jackson vs. against John Quincy Adams. Parson’s book also discusses the events in Andrew Jackson’s and John Quincy Adams’ lives leading up to it as well. The book opens by giving background information about Andrew Jackson and his achievements. Specifically, his success in conquering the Native Americans at the battle of New Orleans and his humble origins made Jackson America’s first “man of the people” candidate for the 1824 election. However, during the 1824 election, Jackson had lost to Adams to which his followers claimed he was denied and should have won.

Andrew Jackson was a man of many accolades. He served in the Revolutionary War and was a general in the War of 1812. He aided in founding the Democratic Party and became the first governor of Florida; not to mention being the seventh President of the United States. While his list of accomplishments is extensive, it is sometimes clouded by his alleged boisterous and lewd behavior. Stemming from this behavior is an ample amount of scandalous activity, both personal and professional.

The rise of Jackson in the decision of 1828 was huge in light of his stance as "the basic man's" hopeful. Jackson was one of the principal Presidents chose who did not have the Federalist family of earlier applicants. At the same time,he did not have the "insider" status of his rival John Quincy Adams. The outcast status that was given upon Jackson was featured by the vast degree of "messy governmental issues" which developed through the crusade. Jackson made cases, legitimate or invalid contingent upon partisanship, of the abuse of political assets.

Major Events, Ethics, and Women in Andrew Jackson’s Life Many famous people have lived in America over time. Some were known for being war heroes and some were born for being political masterminds. Few were blessed with the gift of both. In James C. Curtis’s novel, Andrew Jackson and the Search for Vindication, Curtis goes into detail over Jackson’s life.

The election of 1824, also called a corrupt bargain, was a hotly contested A picture showing who won each state and the amount of electoral votes allotted to each state one and the first one where the person who received the most popular votes and the most electoral votes lost the presidency. Many supporters of Andrew Jackson became outraged after he received the most popular vote, most electoral votes, but not enough votes from the house. Due to the fact that he had the most popular votes and electoral votes, Andrew Jackson surely should have gotten the most votes in the House, but that clearly wasn 't the case. For example, in the state of Kentucky, Andrew Jackson received the second most votes, behind Henry Clay, while Jackson

Some heros save cities, some save hostages, some fly across the world to help someone. However Andrew Jackson is a different kind of a hero, instead of doing all of those things, he created other ways to be a hero by helping with the westward expansion and expanding the country, helping with the supremacy clause and the nullification act and helping the poor with canceling out the national bank. There are so many ways to differ a hero and a villain, perspective and other aspects also go into the decision, however Andrew Jackson is a hero. Even if he didn't fly, have cool superpowers, or save cities and hostages. Andrew Jackson helped a lot with westward expansion.

After John Quincy Adams was done with his presidency, Jackson won back to back presidencies in 1828 and 1832. Even after the death of Andrew Jackson, people still wrote him in for president, which shows the lasting impression he left on the nation. In the writing, “The American Pageant,” it stated that the election of Andrew Jackson was a revolution achieved by ballots instead of bullets. Also, it stated that Jackson’s victory sped up the transfer of power from the country house to the farm house, from the east to the west, from the snobs to the mobs.

If you were a voter in America during the period of Jackson’s presidency, he would have been the ideal candidate for president. He was known as ‘A man of the people’ as he was an ordinary man himself. He made every decision according to the will of the American people. He polled more than 56% of the popular vote that was almost twice as his opponent Henry Clay, was a protagonist; he faced the best British regulars, those who beat the napoleons and won making his country look vigorous. Andrew Jackson was a change from the past presidents, he was not from the Washington elites and was referred to as “A Man of the people”.

According to Thomas P. Abernethy, Jackson was “a frontier nabob who took sides against the democratic movement in his own state…an opportunist for whom democracy was good talk with which to win the favor of the people and thereby accomplish ulterior objectives.” Different views of Jackson continued the debate about who he really was as a leader. It was not until historian Arthur Schlesinger, took a different look at the study of Jackson. He believed that Jackson’s presidency was designed to suppress the power of capitalists, and try to help those of the lower classes. Other historians continued to disagree with Schlesinger, while others supported his idea or enhanced it, saying Jackson was almost similar to a Marxist.

Andrew Jackson was seen as a common man the voice of the people by some. By others he was King Andrew, trampling the constitution and instigating tyranny. Jackson’s presidency impacted democracy, through his use of the veto power, and his claim of Clay creating a “corrupt bargain”, which is not a turning point for a rise in democracy despite him giving white male suffrage. During Jackson’s use of executive power weakened voice of the people.

The image illustrates Andrew Jackson’s creation of a “spoil system”, which gave government positions to individuals who supported him and who he believed would act in his interests. Jackson originally fabricated this system to push individuals to back him in the presidential election.. This visual asserts the popular opinion by the losing party in this election of the corruptness the system and the hunger for power and greed that fueled it.

Andrew Jackson, being a tyrant, abused his power in his time of presidency.   He was the 7th president, but before Jackson’s presidency, he had no political experience. One of the only things that really qualified him was the hardships he went through when he was younger. His father had died while Jackson was young and Jackson received the reputation as a “self-made man”, or an independent man.

He started by replacing many government jobs to officials with his supporters”. This is a major reasons why Jackson was bad. He would be considered an absolute Monarch or King. An example of this is when the Supreme Court sides with the Indians against the state of Georgia, and jackson ignores the supreme court’s ruling. The “spoils system” corrupted the government because no one had a chance to get good at their

The time has come to make a judgement of the great Andrew Jackson, the 7th president of the United States from 1829~1837. Although some people didn’t like Jackson very well due to very few of his decisions, he made many good decisions during his presidency. Andrew Jackson should be remembered as a hero of the common man due to his unifying leadership, generous approach of governing, and concern for economic equality. The first reason that Andrew Jackson should be remembered as a hero is because of his unifying leadership.

Born into a non-aristocratic poor family, somewhere in the Carolina’s on March 14, 1767, was a man named Andrew Jackson. Jackson, also called “Old Hickory” was a very bold proactive man in American history. From being a military hero and founding the democratic party to enacting the trail of tears and dismantling the of the Bank of the United States, the man and his legacy are a prominent topic for scholarly debate. Some believe he was a great president and some believe he was the worse president. But if you look at it from a moral perceptive or in the eyes of a foreigner, Jackson’s legacy was far more villainous than heroic.