Hope, Despair, and Memory: A Rhetorical Analysis
In Elie Wiesel’s Nobel Prize speech, “Hope, Despair, and Memory”, the Holocaust survivor uses various rhetorical devices, such as repetition, rhetorical questions and anecdotes. Furthermore, these devices are used to convey the themes of hope, despair, and memory; they work to evoke emotional responses from the audience as well as highlighting the urgency of the themes. Therefore, the use of repetition, rhetorical questions, and anecdotes will all be explored in this analysis. In addition, we will dissect how the use of rhetorical devices enhances the delivery of Wiesel’s speech and how they make the speech more impactful.
The first rhetorical device,repetition, is a rhetorical device requiring
…show more content…
In addition they are also used for dramatic effect and encourage an audience to reflect on the topic that is brought up by these rhetorical questions. They make the audience more engaged. Furthermore, Elie Wiesel enlists rhetorical questions that prompt his audience to consider their own beliefs, values, and responsibilities. To give an instance, Elie Wiesel asks “ What responsibility do we have to remember the victims and their stories?” This rhetorical question bids the audience to reflect on the ethical obligation they have to remember. Moreover, It begs the audience to remember and pass on their memories for generations to come; to stop them from making the same mistakes that were made in the past. It delves into his theme of memory and the importance of it. By prompting these questions Elie Wiesel encourages self-examination and invites the audience to assess their roles in nurturing hope and preserving memory. Through the use of rhetorical questions Elie Wiesel encourages self reflection, improvement, and prompts his audience to participate in his message; to consider the importance of memory, hope, and despair in their own
In the “Nobel Peace Prize Acceptance Speech,” Elie implied that his memory and many other victims’ memories of the Holocaust should never be forgotten because he believes the victims should be remembered and honored. He believes that others should continue to stand up against antisemitism and keep these memories forever, that way, nothing like the Holocaust ever occurs again. This central idea is shared amongst many other sources, including the book “Night” by Elie Wiesel, The social media article about Lily Ebert titled “It Happened,” and Elie Wiesel’s Acceptance speech. Elie Wiesel created a book called “Night.” Night was a memoir by Elie Wiesel.
Kaiden Sheridan Mrs.Browne English December, 20, 2022 Rhetorical Analysis Paragraph In Night, Eliezer Wiesel’s autobiographical memoir, the rhetorical devices simile and hyperbole describe Elie’s father, conveying the message of hope being coherent with mental health and instilling ideas of despair, the relatable emotion that resides with me the greatest. For example, Elie returning to the medical area after the bread distribution and finding his father “weeping like a child” leads me to believe that the mental torment of concentration camps takes a toll on the well being of Elie’s father, representing the reprocussions of dehumanization(79). I think that Elie’s father cries because people treat him worse than he usually expects. This
Night, written by Elie Wiesel, is a book that recounts the author's experiences as a Jewish teenager during the Holocaust. This book is intresting because it shows people who have never experienced or learned about the Holocaust the horrors of it. It shows poeple why history should never repeat and why people should tell there story. What would you do if history repeated and there was another Holocaust? In this essay, I will analyze and evaluate the effectiveness of the rhetorical strategies used by Wiesel to achieve his purpose, including his central idea, intended audience, and message, as well as his use of ethos, pathos, and logos throughout the book.
When Elie asks questions to the crowd, he also delivers the answer along with it to get his point across. “How will it be remembered in the new millennium? Surely it will be judged, and judged severely.” This style of speaking allows Elie to put his point into
Martin Luther King Jr.’s “I Hhave a Ddream” speech and Elie Wiesel’s acceptance speech for the Nobel Peace Prize both use imagery and repetition in various ways to get their message of freedom and equality to their audience. In both speeches, they use these literary elements to help create a point of what they want the world to know to make it a better place for everyone. In Elie Wiesel’s speech, he uses imagery to better describe “the ghetto” and “the deportation” of the holocaust that he saw and experienced. Wiesel uses his own history of “a young Jewish boy” who “discovered the kingdom of night” to create imagery to make the audience imagine a child during the holocaust, creating a sorrowful and hopeless tone.
One way Wiesel persuades his audience is using his own life experiences, and trauma to further express his intelligence on the Holocaust
There are many examples of rhetorical devices and strategies presented within this speech, but the few that stand out the most are the use of pathos, anaphoras, and point of view. Elie Wiesel utilizes these rhetorical strategies throughout the speech to make the audience feel guilty as well as to come to an understanding of the atrocious events that occurred. Elie Wiesel structures the speech to move people and hopefully create peace activists like himself. Elie begins the speech by describing how a young boy who should be ignorant of most evils had come to know pain and anguish for the prematurely.
Elie Wiesel is a thought-provoking piece that emphasizes the importance of rhetoric and its ability to shape our perceptions and understanding of the world. In this passage, Wiesel discusses the significance of great speeches and the power of language to move individuals and communities. Wiesel's poignant reflections on the transformative power of language encourage us to recognize the vital role that rhetoric plays in shaping our personal and collective narratives. Wiesel's message is particularly relevant in today's world, where language and communication have become increasingly vital tools for shaping public opinion and discourse. Wiesel highlights the importance of careful consideration of the words we use and the messages we convey,
(USHMM) His work culminated in him receiving the Nobel Peace Prize in 1986 where he recited his most famous speech, “Hope, Despair, and Memory” (1986). Wiesel’s speech “Hope, Despair, and Memory” (1986) uses several rhetorical strategies,
Elie Wiesel Rhetorical Speech Analysis Elie Wiesel, a holocaust survivor and winner of a Nobel peace prize, stood up on April 12, 1999 at the White House to give his speech, “The Perils of Indifference”. In Wiesel’s speech he was addressing to the nation, the audience only consisted of President Clinton, Mrs. Clinton, congress, and other officials. The speech he gave was an eye-opener to the world in his perspective. Wiesel uses a variety of rhetorical strategies and devices to bring lots of emotion and to educate the indifference people have towards the holocaust. “You fight it.
Grant-Davie opens his writing with numerous definitions of a rhetorical situation. He then says that these definitions do not grasp the complexity of rhetorical situations. To fully understand a rhetorical situation, he suggests an analysis of the exigence, recognizing that rhetors and audience are both a part of a rhetorical situation, and that there may be multiple rhetors or audience. Grant-Davie then stated the four constituents in rhetorical situations that are exigence, rhetors, audiences, and constraints.
Paradox, parallelism, personification, repetition, rhetorical question, pathos. You may ask yourself: what importance do these words have? These words are rhetorical devices used to develop a claim. A person who used these important devices was Elie Wiesel. In his 1986 Nobel Peace Acceptance Speech, Elie Wiesel develops the claim that remaining silent on human sufferings makes us just as guilty as those who inflicted the suffering and remain guilty for not keeping the memory of those humans alive.
In his 1986 Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech, Elie Wiesel strives to inform his audience of the unbelievable atrocities of the Holocaust in order to prevent them from ever again responding to inhumanity and injustice with silence and neutrality. The structure or organization of Wiesel’s speech, his skillful use of the rhetorical appeals of pathos and ethos, combined with powerful rhetorical devices leads his audience to understand that they must never choose silence when they witness injustice. To do so supports the oppressors. Wiesel’s speech is tightly organized and moves the ideas forward effectively. Wiesel begins with humility, stating that he does not have the right to speak for the dead, introducing the framework of his words.
Elie Wiesel, an American Jewish holocaust survivor, that was also a political activist, writer, and professional speaks a heartfelt speech to get across his message about the people who died in the Holocaust by using rhetorical techniques By using logos, Wiesel reiterates what it looked like to be a child and live through the holocaust that affected everyone around him. As a child, he was not able to thoroughly understand what it was like being a child when the Nazis made all Jewish citizens go to ghettos, using sealed cattle cars, which paints a logical picture. “A young Jewish boy discovers the kingdom of night. I remember his bewilderment, I remember his anguish.”
Elie Wiesel: Keeping Memory Alive Purpose: Elie Wiesel, a Holocaust survivor is informing us the importance of speaking out and never to remain silent- like many countries did, during the Holocaust. Throughout his writings Elie Wiesel tries to give honor and respect to the 6 million who perished in the Holocaust, the survivors and their children with his powerful, uplifting words. Elie Wiesel also bears witness to “the horrors of his experiences at the hands of the Nazis”. Tone: Elie Wiesel’s “Keeping Memory Alive” is a very short but powerful acceptance speech. Throughout his speech, he hints to us that he was humbled by getting the nobel peace prize.