Gun control is a hot topic in America. Yet, we rarely hear of discussion on this issue. Throughout these articles, both authors have a good example of why gun-control should be the answer or not. The first article, Gun control isn’t the answer, the author argues, regardless, of strict gun laws in America people will still have access to guns. He states that getting rid of guns wouldn’t prevent criminals from buying illegal weapons. For instance, Europe had declared gun free but the murder rate in Europe was still higher than of America. One good example the author state is, having access to gun can prevent you from danger, protect your loved ones and your personal belongs. In contrast, the second article, Gun control pro-gun control, focuses on why gun laws should be stricter than they are now. The former mayor is an advocate of stricter of gun laws and supports the movement. However, second amendments fanatics such as Rand Paul is against gun-control. The author argues, if the people that have access to guns are responsible and using the gun for …show more content…
What they don't talk about is that fact that you can't walk into an elementary school and kill 20 children with a knife nearly as easily as you can with a gun. Yes criminals will commit crimes regardless but it's about damage control. As the author James Wilson mentions, “You can declare a place gun free zone but people will still bring guns”. If you believe the gun free zone that gun supporters like to throw around then we should make sure people are free to bring guns onto airplanes because hijackings are simply a result of passengers not having the guns they need to protect themselves. More guns is not the solution to a high gun murder rate, you need to prevent citizens from obtaining weapons that can kill 10 or 20 people with minimal effort. This is completely
Gun control versus gun right’s has been the most controversial topic in the United States, especially for the past (5) five years. It has been said that gun control violates a citizen’s right to bear arms. Although, many citizens see gun control as a violation of their rights, guns still is the cause of innocent Americans killed for not having tougher gun control laws establish. Gun control in America is not the particular problem in America, but it is the number one cause of needless crimes today. This assignment is not to point fingers on which side is right, but this assignment is to come to common grounds to enforce safety for our society from needless gun violence.
Proponents of more gun control laws believe that the Second Amendment was intended exclusively for militias, that gun restrictions have always existed, and that gun regulations would prevent criminals from possessing firearms. However, Opponents claim that the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to own guns, that guns are needed for self-defense, and that gun ownership helps to dissuade crime. Because of this obvious difference, proponents of stricter firearm regulation demand more laws to help prevent mass shooting, and want reform in the area of background checks. Meanwhile, opponents of gun laws often accuse the proponents of manipulating a mass tragedy in order to further strengthen their fight. Gun ownership has been a tradition within the united states since before the country itself was formed.
All around the world there has been evidence collected that proves more guns means more death and that less guns means fewer deaths. The argument of whether or not gun laws lessen gun crimes is conversed about every single day. Among this argument there are some misconceptions. For example: Guns are exceptionally available in the United States compared to other developed countries which gives a valid explanation as to why the United States has the highest murder rate. The key question the author is addressing has to deal with the debate whether or not gun restrictions lessen gun crime.
I believe that if gun control can be implemented our nation can decrease gun violence. Wilson had asked for his readers to not be overlooked by the mass shooting case such as Virginia Tech and understand that United States can be under the way of increasing gun violence if gun control rules. I believe that Wilson lack the thought that the mass shooting at Virginia Tech caused 32 deaths by one individual. These were 32 innocent people who potentially were not associated to the perpetrator. For this reason, I disagree with Wilson argument and do not believe that by allowing the practices of gun will decrease gun
Since 1982, regulations on an individual’s right to arms have been negotiated. 55 percent of Americans see direct correlation between guns and crimes,but they don’t see the other side of the story. Guns is not what causes these crimes. Because of the real meaning behind the second amendment, the real reason behind mass shootings, and the
Gun control is what restricts people from buying and using guns, but these laws are not strengthened at the extent they need to be strengthened. This leads to many people getting these guns and using them to cause mass shootings all over the U.S. For example, according to the Council on Foreign Relationship, a news article that covers major world issues, in 2017, mass shootings at a music festival in Las Vegas and at a church near San Antonio have rekindled the gun control debate (“U.S. Gun Policy: Global Comparisons”). The fact that gun control is still not tightened is a huge margin and error, and still causes mass shootings as we just covered. Many people have said that we should not allow guns to be purchased, which would seem like the logical option. However, according to the same source, Council on Foreign Relationship, some states, such as Idaho, Alaska, and Kansas, have passed various laws attempting to nullify
According to R Roth in Social Science History, 2002, the issue of gun violence in the U.S. is deeply embedded in the history of the nation, and the lack of a comprehensive national gun control policy has left the United States with a patchwork of laws that may not be effective in preventing gun violence. This patchwork of laws is further complicated by the fact that states, counties, and cities have the ability to enact their own laws, meaning that gun control regulations can vary greatly from one state to the next. As such, it is necessary to take an holistic, multi-faceted approach to addressing the issue of gun violence in the United States. This approach should include not only measures such as enhanced background checks, but also measures to address the underlying causes of gun violence such as poverty, racism, and access to mental health services. With a comprehensive, nation-wide approach to gun control, the United States may be able to reduce the rate of gun violence and make its citizens
The article “The United States needs gun control”, co-written by numerous authors is a modern review that analyzes the infective policies of gun control in the United States through personal opinions based on modern situations. At the time of this article, gun control was a major topic in congressional sessions and a common headed debate. This article was written five days after the Las Vegas Shooting, which is consider the deadliest mass shooting committed by an individual in the United States. One of the main points of this article that comes from all authors is the need for tighter regulation and more congressional legislation on guns. They each argue that they firmly believe in the Second Amendment, but only to a certain extent and that it clearly needs some modifications.
The gun ownership was legalized in United States in 1787, but crimes committed by the people who have guns still endanger the life or property safety of innocent citizens now. According to Follman’s study,“ since 1982 there have been at least 61 mass murders carried out with firearms across the United States, with the killings unfolding in 30 states from Massachusetts to Hawaii” (Follman 119). It shows that many criminals have guns and many people are under the fear state of being killed. As a result, it made the topic whether the government should control guns more strictly more controversial.
Jeremiah Briseno Ms. Heather Walker College Prep English Feb 24, 2023 Argumentative Essay: Gun Control The issue of gun control has been a highly controversial topic in the United States. The debate centers around whether or not the government should regulate the ownership and use of firearms. Gun control advocates argue that strict regulations can reduce the number of gun-related crimes and deaths, while opponents of gun control argue that such regulations infringe on the Second Amendment right to bear arms.
Gun Control Debate Jake Novak, in an article for CNBC titled, “Gun control isn’t the answer. We already know how to stop the violence,” gives his opinion regarding the controversial issue of gun control. Novak argues that gun control is not the answer to rising gun violence but that proper enforcement of the law would go a long way in reducing the cases of gun violence in America. He states, “We actually solved the issue of rising gun violence in America in the mid-1990’s and again in the early 2000’s by doing something radical. We enforced the law” (Novak 28).
A weapon in the wrongs hands is the maximum danger humanity can face. Nowadays, violence and delinquency in society are viewed as the maximum problem solver. Humanity is full of chaos; hate and envy seize our souls. Guns are the ultimate security for some citizens but for others, these add to a feeling of defenselessness. Throughout history, any topic related to guns means a plethora of problems.
Strict regulations and limitations have been pursued already and clearly do not suffice. Statics brought to attention by gun control opponents, show that gun control laws have done little to reduce crime rates. Several restrictions have been made on certain guns, considered as overly dangerous, though in the hands of an unstable criminal even a legal hunting gun can be deadly. Countless restrictions have been made, however people have still found ways around them. If people are unstable and determined enough, they will find a gun, regardless of the restrictions or regulations.
In today’s society, one of the most alienating issues in American politics is gun control. More specifically, the issue is whether or not guns should be banned in the United States. Some people would say that guns should be banned because it would reduce crime as a whole and keep citizens safer. These people, enthusiasts of stricter gun laws, fear being safe in their country where there are so many people who have access to guns. Opponents of this argument, however, also fear losing safety.
This paper also provides an interesting solution to gun violence; instead of already proven ineffective gun control laws, these authors suggest looking at why these laws are ineffective. Planty, Michael, and Jennifer