Family, in almost every individual’s life plays a quintessential roll in ones physical and emotional growth, as well is responsible for being a guiding force for in every member of the family . This is exactly the case in both Nick Hornby’s novel About a Boy, and John Lee Hancock’s biographical film, The Blind Side. In both The Blind Side and About a Boy mirroring stories are told in which a boy is taken in raised by a family and made into socially acceptable people, despite the outcomes of the children being taken in being different.. Furthermore,In both stories families take the responsibility in making Michael from The Blind Side, and Marcus From About A Boysocially accepted and successful people, and their family as a resource to find out what their strong-suite is, and use that as way to fit into society. Furthermore, The families in both are able to improve upon themselves with help to the boy they take in. Despite stark similarities between both stories, the ways in which both families …show more content…
The Children, Marcus and Michael, both gain significant support from these families which allows for themselves to develop as a person. Furthermore, it allows for the family to develop along with the Child despite the means at which the family provide the support being different. The amount the family, as well as the boy learn about themselves teaches people the importance of acceptance and kindness. As in both stories the families show an significant amount of care and kindness towards the child they take in, and in turn benefit the child enormously. However, they also manage to benefit along the way. This teaches people the impact being kind, and accepting towards someone can have, and the importance in doing so. As had the families not taken them in, most likely the child would have never succeeded, but they’re lives would be significantly worse off as
The children were taught to always look at the glass half full that half empty. Throughout their struggle, their parents unique mindset set them apart from standard, but they never let their experiences turn into
Another item that is extremely important in both stories is the use and importance of fate. Both characters rely on their fates for assistance and for achieving
There are similarities and differences to be found in the stories through God’s provisions, the father/son relationships, and their tones.
How is it that two men that come from identical backgrounds end up being completely opposites? Wes Moore takes us back to his childhood growing up, and also introduces us to a character sharing the same name as him, and similarly, the same lifestyle. Both of the young men shared the absence of a father figure, living in poor neighborhoods, bad influences, and lack of education. While reading, we question “how?” and “why?”
These both show that even against seemingly impossible odds you can still thrive and overcome any hardship and grow into a successful and honorable person. This also shows how much a child’s caregiver and the way they are raised can affect them. Abuse is a very serious issue and going unnoticed can have very harmful
While the similarities are smaller, like the considerate personalities shared between the main characters of both
One of the most important similarity is that both stories are well enjoyed over generations and teach great life lessons that serve the sole purpose of the
and Of Mice and Men share is that they're both good stories about struggle with internal and external conflict and how strong they stick together
Even though both of these stories include the theme of reaching for something you don’t quite have may be in place in totally different texts that use their imagery in different ways, you can still find similar themes in both pieces of
Although, they have similarity, the two stories has major differences also. First, both author differs the way they introduce and develop their lead characters to the reader. Second, they also differ in perspective from which their stories are being told. Third, they differs on the choice of settings and how it impact to the stories.
It was harder for the Young family to do simple things, but they overcome their obstacles and stayed true to themselves throughout the
Lost Sparrow is a film about the pros and cons of inter-racial/out-of-state adoption, the death of two boys, and an exorbitant amount of secrets a single family can keep within their folds. This film shows us that secrets always come out and can directly affect relationships and the lives of those around you. Secrets are a big theme in this film, as it shows you what they can do to the people around you, and who people really are. Lost Sparrow illustrates how the truth comes out, and how it can be distorted over time depending on the people involved. Overall, this film made me angry and sad at how difficult these children’s lives were.
The only similarity between the two is that a great wrong is done by each, yet how each character chooses to handle these wrongs is a testament to their character,
It also keeps kinship intact (2002). A child’s identity is based on ethnicity, race, religion and social class and is ascribed at birth through the family. Families permit the transmission of wealth and status from parents to children. According to the American functionalist sociologist Talcott Parsons, the family’s main functions are ‘primary socialisation and personality stabilisation’. Primary socialisation is the processes in which children learn the cultural norms of the society they are born into.
They both relate to each other in a couple of ways how the main characters in both stories hallucinate and have an ambition for something.