Fall Of The Roman Empire Essay

As Rome’s government began to change, the leadership became much less consistent. According to a chart compiled from various resources that lists the Roman emperors between 235 BCE and 285 BCE (Document 1), a majority of these emperors ruled for roughly two to three years, however some reigned for as little as or less than a year and some as much as seven to eight years. This constant change in leadership left the Roman army questioning their leadership often times more devoted to their earnings than to the man paying them. These leaders became careless as time went on, as stated in Vegetius’ Concerning Military Matters (Document 2), and the conflicting and constantly changing opinions on military strategy left the rigor and morale of the army in shambles. He states “...because of negligence and laziness, parade ground drills were abandoned, the customary armor began to seem heavy since the soldiers rarely ever wore it.

The two most important factors that led to the fall of the Roman Empire in 476 CE were poor leadership and Military problems. The poor leadership in the Empire was a major factor that ultimately led the Roman Empires to their demise. Some of these bad emperors had mental

Is America destined to fall like Rome? There are many controversial arguments over this theory because Rome and America can be compared and contrasted in many ways. Some similarities are that they are both the biggest nations of their time, and America has based some of their decisions after the Roman example. There are many differences that overrule the similarities because America has experienced many technological advancements, the United States is a democratic society, and America can learn from Rome’s past to make better decisions for our future. America will not fall like Rome.

Did Rome really fall? According to many scientists, it technically did, however from the information I have obtained in class, I believe it could be considered a dramatic transformation. Of course, when transforming something it is going to have its ups and downs and Rome did just that. From the time of Julius Caesar to Octavian and all the way through the Carolingian Empire, Rome went through many transitions. Diocletian, Constantine, Christianity, and the barbarian tribes all played a role in what happened to the Roman Empire.

Fall of The Roman Empire Although many factors contributed to the fall of the Roman Empire, the two that influenced influenced it the most are the fact that the empire split, and that the roman legions were weak towards the fall. A quote that supports my claim is “East and West failed to effectively work together and to combat outside threats, and the two often argued over resources and military aid… most importantly, the strength of the East served to divert barbarian invasions to the west.” This supports my claim because it showed that the two could not work well together causing the East to grow while the West fell. Another quote that supports my claim is “Unable to recruit enough soldiers from the Roman people, emperors like Diocletian

Why did the most dominant and strong empire of its time “fall”? Rome came falling down for many reasons like plague, natural disaster, weak army, many rulers dying, and the lack of social justice. In this essay I will be talking about the key points on how Rome fell. Rome fell because of plague,weak military, and because people were not happy with the government and taxes.

The legendary Roman Empire lasted from 753 B.C.E. all the way until 1453 A.D. However Rome split in two at about 395 A.D. which crippled the ancient Rome we know. So really ancient Rome lived from 753 B.C.E. to 476 A.D. But the name of Rome continued on in the Byzantine empire for about another 1000 years. Yet many people nowadays still refer to Rome as one of the greatest ancient civilizations of all time.

Fall of Rome DBQ Including most of the Mediterranean world, Rome, a city that was growing big enough to become one of the world’s largest empire’s would soon slowly fall apart because of their problems. In 27 BC, Rome’s first emperor, Augustus Caesar, took complete power. During his time, he ruled with Pax Romana, a time of Roman peace which lasted for almost 200 years. After his death, the Roman Empire begun to break apart. The primary reasons for the fall of Rome was it being geographically too big; the population was decreasing due to plagues which led to the Roman army becoming weak, social and military issues and laziness of the military would guide the army down which led to cities being lost, and their government and leadership issues of the weak or selfish power leaders would all conduct to the breaking up of Rome.

The Roman Empire was starting to diminish. Wars had to be fought, diseases spread across the land, many people died, causing the population to decrease. More and more people left Rome. The primary reasons for the “fall” of Rome were because of war, invasion, and natural disasters or diseases. One of the main reasons for the Roman Empire falling was because of war.

Imagine the country, that proud citizens worked so hard to build, all came crashing down. The people faced the awful effects of hunger, homelessness, and confusion. With the similarities between Rome when it was falling, and America today, it is only right to think that the U.S. may be heading in that direction. The similarities between the two countries are mind-blowing. This leads to the conclusion that if America does not change its ways, America will end up like Rome.

I agree that Rome was not overthrown by external enemies but was defeated by its own internal problems. The fall of Rome was mainly due to internal problems because the Romans were only fulfilling their own needs, the law were not reliable and the struggle with the right emperor led to the end of Rome. These internal problems made the empire unstable and led to external problems. For example, in document C, Marcellinus, a Roman soldier criticizes the Romans for being selfish and only worrying about themselves.

The Romans made a concerted effort in their receptiveness of others and their respective religions so long as peace existed in the empire. However, Monotheistic Jews, Christians, and the Romans at times were consumed by tensions as beliefs, practices or teachings varied concerning religious ideals. Christians for one resisted compromise thereby increasing strain among the population (Freeman). An attempt to consolidate religions or uniformly designate only one true religion occurred as well (Freeman). Moreover, these offers of resistance only added to the pressures of the diverse populations.

It seems that the fall of the Roman Republic was not a singular event that occurred instantaneously, but rather a long process that saw the increasing use of methods outside of Republican institutions to settle conflicts between members of the aristocracy over political power. Even as the Roman government transitioned form Kingdom to Republic and then to Empire, the competition between aristocratic families remained a relative constant in across the centuries. So too has the desire to mythologize the past. The romans attributed both the fall of the Kingdom of Rome and the fall of the Roman Republic to moral rot, while a more reasonable assessment might place the blame on a dissatisfied and competitive elite class and an inefficient and unresponsive governmental system that was unwilling or unable to address their concerns. In much the same way, modern observers of the Roman Republic have tended to mythologize the fall of the Republic in the service of creating a moral narrative about the unconscionable tyranny of Cesar and the righteousness of the Senate, or whatever alternative narrative is befitting of the historical moment and audience.

The Roman Empire fell for many different reasons. The main reason is that Diocletian divided the empire. After this event occurred, many conflicts arose. In the Eastern (Byzantine) Empire, there were many invasions and other riots after Justinian’s death. This led to its fall in 1453, when an army of Turks invaded and captured the capital.

Rome 455, Geiserics forces sack the city killing the last of the garrisoned legions and killing the Emperor of the west roman for the final time, however its people were spared of a mass slaughter. Further the governing body the senate was spared and there were still allowed to govern. Geiseric then declared himself king of the romans of all things, he even voluntarily made himself subordinate to the emperor of the east, commonly know as the Byzantines. This event is deemed the “Fall of the Rome empire” most say this is the time rome was destroyed, or at least that the east was the last hold out. First I’d like to state that in my personal belief truly rome was just split up into its provinces, like how the province of Italia is now Italy, or how the province of Britannia is now Britain, etc.