Compare And Contrast Articles Of Confederation Between 1781 And 1787

The articles of confederation, shays rebellion, and the U.S. constitution are all related to each other in a certain way. The articles of confederation were approved by the congress then ratified by the states. It was an attempt to unite the new country and form a government. Shays rebellion revealed the article’s weaknesses. It showed that the country had economic difficulties and couldn’t raise an army.

SIMULATED CONGRESSIONAL HEARING SPEECH QUESTIONS Unit Three - What happened at the Philadelphia Convention? 1. Because of different economic systems, Northern and Southern states had different interests. These conflicting interests led to disagreements at the Philadelphia Convention. • Describe at least two disagreements between Northern and Southern states at the Convention.

Southern states battled for slaves to be checked as far as portrayal. The bargain between the two wound up plainly known as the three-fifths trade off on the grounds that each five slaves would be included as three people terms of portrayal. Commerce Compromise, The bargain commanded that duties were just to be permitted on imports from outside nations and not sends out from the U.S. This trade off likewise directed that interstate business would be managed by the government. It additionally required that all trade enactment be passed by a 66% larger part in the Senate, which was a win for the South since it countered the energy of the more crowded Northern states.

What were the Articles of Confederation? (1-2 sentences) The Articles of confederation was a draft that took 12 years in the making, it was later used to create the US constitution; the states laws of governance. It is how the government is run and explains its values. The main difference between the two articles is, the Articles of Confederation in practice would have little power to the central government.

The us constitution and the Articles of Confederation are similar but different in many ways. The articles of confederation line out the basic ideas of government and written in the US Constitution are the expanded ideas that make the United States Unique. The Articles of confederation #7 states that all of the United States of America have to vote for the ratification of one thing. This was established to keep silly laws/acts to the Articles of Confederation from being amended but as more important amendments had to ratified it became nearly impossible to have all of the state representatives vote together for the ratification of one thing.

Many of these farmers who joined the rebellion had been fighting in the American Revolution, leading the farmers to not be able to tend to their land. The government did not pay them for all the time the farmers spent fighting in the war. Shay was determined to save his farm so he gathered nearly 2,000 farmers and started to attack courthouses. The point of attacking courthouses was to prevent the courts from selling property as payment for debts. Once George Washington stated, “If there exists not a power to check them,” Washington questioned what would happen and what was happening at the time without an executive branch (Document 3).

The article of confederation were laws that the 13 states in the United States accepted and signed; while the U.S constitution is a set of rules that govern the nation's citizens. The articles of confederation has a lot of flaws with weaknesses like no power to tax, no national executive, no judicial/national court, no checks and balances; which all resulted in no money, no enforcement of laws, unequal representation. In comparison, the U.S constitution creates equal representation, meaning that small states have an equal voice. The U.S constitution also keeps disagreements from happening, allowing a better transition of power. In the 5th and 14th amendments, the constitution says that "the government shall not deprive anybody of life, liberty,

The period between the adoption of the Articles of Confederation in 1781 and the drafting of the new Constitution in 1787 was one of weakness, dissension and turmoil. Under the Articles of Confederation, no provisions were made for an executive branch to enforce the laws nor for a national court system to interpret them. A legislative Congress was the sole organ of the national government, but it had no power to force the states to do anything against their will. It could declare war and raise an army, but it could not force any state to meet its assigned quota for troops or for the arms and equipment needed to support them. It looked to the states for the income needed to finance its activities, but it could not punish a state for not contributing its share of the federal budget.

The rebellion was an armed uprising by small farmers over high debts and tax burdens. The American Revolution cost the British a lot of money, but instead, these costs were put upon the colonies through taxes such as the Stamp Act and Townshend Acts, rather than the British taxing their own people. This new established government of 1777 was given the responsibility to continue paying for Britain's debts and each colony was required to help pay it off individually. The government threatened the farmers to pay taxes or else their land would be sold, but farmers could not afford the tax being imposed on their state. As a result, the farmers started to resist taxes through violence and did not cooperate with the government.

he Articles of Confederation were not a sufficient set of principles for the fledgling United States to rely upon. The main discussion point of the Articles of Confederation was how much power a new government should have, which was something that many disagreed on. The sole branch of government was the legislative branch, which made compelling states to follow laws difficult, if not impossible. Additionally, there were tensions between larger and smaller states over the value of their one vote in Congress, which had not been addressed yet by the Articles of Confederation. As such, the United States Constitution was a profoundly radical departure from the previous resolution of the Articles of Confederation for a multitude of causes.

The Virginia Plan was proposed in order to settle disagreements among states over the issue of representation. Due to the extreme differences in population between the states, larger states wanted representation to be based off of population, while the smaller states wanted representation to be equal for all states regardless of population. Today the U.S. government still uses population as a way of representation in parliament. In addition to the Virginia Plan, the 3/5’s Compromise was also created as a way to settle conflicts. This compromise was reached, because southern states wanted slaves to count as part of the population and order to get more representation, while the northern states did not.

The Articles of Confederation (A.O.C) are said to be a good representation of the original platform of Republicanism, and Trump has derived his platform from the Republican party beliefs. The opinions stated in the A.O.C and by Trump align with each other in a multitude of ways. Though they are both connected to the same party, they have many contrasting points as well, due to the modernization of the party platforms. The Articles of Confederation was written by the continental congress. Drafting began in July of 1776, it was sent for ratification in November of 1777, and it came into force in March of 1781.

One of the compromises made in the Constitutional Convention is the three-fifths compromise. In this compromise, the southerners wanted to add slaves to the population of the state they lived in. If slaves were included in their state’s population, that state would be able to add more representatives in the House of Representatives. Northerners did not agree with that statement because slaves did not have the right to vote. After the delegates compromised, they agreed that only three-fifths of the slave’s population would be counted into the state’s population.

In 1787 and 1788, the Federalist Papers were written and published in various newspapers in the state of New York intended to encourage Yorkers to vote in ratifying the proposed Constitution. The famous papers consist of eighty-five essays authored by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay. In Federalist Paper No. 17, Alexander Hamilton explicitly addresses the fear that the proposed Constitution would lead to oppression at the hands of an “autocratic” national government. Hamilton argues that even if the national government were to try and seize the power of the states, it would not be simple to do. The main reason Hamilton gives that the States rights would be reserved is because these government have a greater influence over

The Articles of the Confederation was the first government constitution that the United States used, and, although there were strength like the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, there were major weaknesses of the Articles of the Confederation like the following: requiring 9 out of the 13 colonial votes from the representatives from different states to pass a law; having no executive and judicial branch; and the federal government being unable to impose tax revenue onto the states. Such flaws would eventually lead to the Constitution and the repeal of the articles, for the Constitution was a measure to fix the problems of the articles with a stronger government that allowed them to impose taxes and and implement new laws for a more effective government.