Casey Anthony Research Paper

1157 Words5 Pages

Casey Anthony Murder Trial: The final verdict
Clutching the hand of her defense attorney, Jose Baez, Casey Anthony began to sob as the verdict was read. Not guilty. The jury declined to convict her either of first degree murder or manslaughter. Casey Anthony was the mother of two year old Caylee Anthony. On July 16th, 2008, Casey was arrested after her mother, Cindy Anthony, notified authorities that her granddaughter, Caylee, had been missing for 31 days. The day in July that a non-guilty verdict was announced, Americans were confused of how that came to be and questions rose. Many Americans wondered who was to blame for the murder, if Casey did not kill Caylee. It was apparent that the jury received information that the press did not, that …show more content…

(CNN.com). Later that day, grandmother, Cindy Anthony, made a phone call reporting that her granddaughter, Caylee Anthony had been gone for over a month and her whereabouts were unknown. When this was reported, the police began the investigation immediately. (Crimemuseum.com). Casey Anthony was a prime suspect considering she had not taken action to report that her own daughter was missing. She was taken into custody and questioned shortly after Caylee was reported missing. While she was in dcustody, Casey told the police that she had last seen her daughter in June and that she had dropped her off with their nanny, Zanedia Fernandez-Gonzolaz. (Wayzata.com). She had also claimed to be currently employed at Universal Studios, where she started in June of 2004. The information given to police by Casey lead them to investigate Zanedia, the nanny. She immediately became a prime suspect. The police were led to a dead end and came to realize Casey had been untruthful, and that there was no nanny to begin with. Zanedia Fernandez-Gonzolaz was indeed a real person, but was not associated with Casey, or Caylee’s disappearance or death. Police also proceeded to investigate her workplace and came to find out that Anthony was no longer employed at Universal Studios and had been fired in a previous year. As the investigation went on, the police questioned …show more content…

When seeking information on the trial, information is commonly presented with a dramatic and media based view of the case, rather than evidence that revealed the problems that the prosecution had with its case, like the lack of an established motive. In acquitting Anthony, the jury made the right call. The Casey Anthony trial offered little to no evidence pointing to Casey Anthony. It provided neither justice nor clarity. For 33 days, defense and prosecutors attorneys battled over evidence in the trial. Casey Anthony stood accused of murdering her two-year-old daughter Caylee in 2008. But while Caylee’s remains were found near the Anthony home, there was no DNA match, no confession, no murder weapon and no cause of death. The Casey Anthony trial over forensic evidence came to an end on July 5th, 2011. After hearing the state’s case, the defense, and analyzing the evidence provided, it was concluded that there was not enough substantial evidence to convict Casey Anthony of 2nd degree murder or

Open Document