Bureaucracy In The 1800's

Fill in the title of the partner who reports specifically to the president. This position may be an office director. This position box is headed toward the side and associated just to the president 's crate.

The president should also “deal with influence in more strategic terms”, through working to have influence when he wants it (267). 2. According to Neustadt, the president’s five categories of constituencies are the Executive officialdom, Congress, his partisans, citizens at large, and those from abroad. This greatly impacts the job of the president.

The succession follows the order of Vice President, Speaker of the House of Representatives, President pro tempore of the Senate, and then the heads of federal executive departments who form the Cabinet of the United States. The Cabinet currently has fifteen members, beginning with the Secretary of State, and followed by the rest in the order of their positions' creation. Those heads of department who are ineligible to act as President are also ineligible to succeed the President by succession, for example most commonly if they are not a natural-born U.S. citizen. In 1792, Congress passed the first presidential succession act. This act was fraught with political wrangling between the Federalists and Antifederalists, as much early U.S. policy

Each chapter details one method congressmen and presidents use to move up in their careers, explaining the concept through stories of each politician employing the strategy. Presenting the ideas in this way gives a thorough understanding of the principle, and keeps both political and non-political readers interested through the whole book. In the introduction, Matthews defines hardball for readers. It “is clean, aggressive Machiavellian politics.

Hayes had different opinions than many previous presidents. Hayes wanted to end the “Spoils System”. Past presidents had appointed people that had contributed to their campaign, or were friends with the president. Hayes chose people for his cabinet based on their qualifications, even if he didn’t agree with their opinions. “As president, Hayes sent an important example by appointing candidates who were well qualified for the jobs” (Otfinoski 58).

The proper role of government in Americans’ lives is to have control over business to help improve our economy. The lack of control over business in the 1920’s lead to the Great Depression and because of this mistake the government needs to be in control of the people's lives due to the providing benefits for businesses and jobs. The government's role in Americans lives during the 1920’s was a “hands off”, while the Great Depression’s government at the time took control in businesses and people's lives. During the 1920’s, coming back from war, the American government saw this as a time high income and feeling as if business could regulate themselves. Due to this, the American people began to overuse credit and have an increase of stock market

The most effective bureaucratic system is that of the United States. If i could change the US bureaucratic system to one for another nation, I would choose not to do so because the citizens of America would not do well with a drastic change. The system we have now is productive and effective in doing its job. The United States, in the past, has been known to be the best nation in the world for many years. Other countries would look up to this country's system and try to replicate it so their nation could be as effective as this one.

My group and I have chosen to do politics in the 1800’s. My name is Vicente Martinez. Today is October 6, 2017. My title for this presentation is Politics. Politics in the 1800’s is really interesting.

Even the president, whose legislative abilities are somewhat limited, must rely on the powers of persuasion and bargaining to influence congressional policy outcomes. However, given that politicians often need favors from the President, this gives him or her an advantage. In Presidential Power and the Modern Presidents: The Politics of Leadership from Roosevelt to Reagan by Richard E. Neustadt, Neustadt identifies three primary sources of effective influence. Neustadt writes: “In short, his [the President’s] power is the product of his vantage points in government...his reputation in the Washington community and his prestige outside” (Neustadt 150). Because the simulated presidency arguably lacks professional reputation and public prestige, focusing on vantage points in government is the most fruitful for our analysis as this feature exists in simulated

The government role expanded from 1877-1920 because of all the power that was being abuse by the rich. For a long time, the country dealt with inequality, such as paying anyone who was not a white man less and over working them. Not only was abused power and inequality pay depending on your color or gender or age a problem but the food was being processed with chemicals that made people sick and in other cases die. The growing of the government is good because it shortened work hours for women, made it safer to eat meat and other foods, and dealt with politicians who bought their way to office.

This position aides the President in healthcare decisions, approval of drugs, protects the health of American's, and provides essential human services. This used to include the Education system in these duties but it has become large enough to have it’s own

Back in the 19th century members were appointed to office using the spoils system, which pretty much means after winning an election, the political party or president gives government jobs to its supporters, friends, and relatives as a reward for working toward victory, and as an incentive to keep working for the party. After people became fed up with the spoils system and a disappointed officer assassinated President Garfield they started using the merits system. The merits system is the process of promoting and hiring government employees based on their ability to perform a job, rather than on political connections. The spoils system was developed about 150 years ago.

Using the ideas of Perrow and his defense of bureaucracy, the way some professors construct their courses for undergraduate students are examples of what bureaucracy is good for. Take AFAS-371 for example (Hip-Hop Cinema); this course has an integrated, centralized and mechanistic bureaucratic structure. AFAS-371 is an example for what bureaucracy is good for because there are uniform/well defined tasks and goals (limiting particularism), a small top-down centralized hierarchy allowing for easy communication between - Graders, Teaching Assistance and the Professor, and the rules/procedures are laid out in a clear and easy to learn manner which limits mistakes and slow decision making. Having 1,200 students in one course is no easy task to manage,

2) Charismatic authority; where acceptance comes from faithfulness to and beliefs, personal qualities of the rulers. 3) Rational-legal authority; where acceptance came from the office, or position, persons authorized as limited by the rules and procedures of the organization. According to Weber, bureaucracy is a goal-oriented organization that operates efficiently to achieve their goals according to rational principles. And also, according to Weber, bureaucratic organizations operate “sine ira ac studio, meaning without a sense of bias of favor, relying solely on a professional decision-maker” (Rheinstein, 1954, 190-2). Hierarchical bureaucracy is one of the key features and essential in an organization.

His study was comparative and stressed on the fact that public officials encountered much more administrative constraints than their colleagues in private organizations. However, the breakthrough in the red tape literature came with the research of Bozeman, who in 1993 provided the definition of organizational red tape- “rules, regulations and procedures that remain in force and entail a compliance burden for the organization but have no efficacy for the rules’ functional object” (Bozeman, 1993: 283), which is the most cited definition in the field to this day. This definition presupposes that red tape is objective in nature, but scholars like Kaufman and Feeney (2012) noted that most conducted researches are based on research methods like interviews and surveys, measuring red tape subjectively, or otherwise looking for difference in individuals’