So let 's assume for a second that Apollo 11’s moon landing was indeed a hoax and that NASA pulled it off successfully in turn fooling everybody. So they succeeded in their goal to beat the Soviet Union in the race to the Moon. Assumptions about the missing evidence based on info and conclusions are drawn before the facts call for it, are known as hasty generalizations. We must carefully gather as much information as possible. Since we did not have the technology we did not go to the Moon in 1969, therefore, we will never go to the Moon. Another assumption could be that we did not go to the moon because there is no physical evidence and the tapes were “erased”; therefore, we must have never landed on the moon. If there’s no moisture on the moon, then how come you …show more content…
More people would get involved with each consecutive mission. For example, more scientists were involved in each successive flight because they were interested in actually studying the Moon from as close as possible. So why take the risk? They had already won the race, so why risk it again? NASA actually went to the Moon SIX TIMES. There would have been absolutely no reason to continue the hoax after the first landing. Why take the risk? They could have simply said that the spaceflights are way too risky and expensive, with no real advantages. Nobody would have questioned these motives. Curiously, there is a minority of conspiracy theorists who acknowledge this. For instance, there 's a subset of them who claim that only the first landing was faked, but all the later ones were genuine. There are also those who claim that the landings were genuine but the photographs were faked because it wasn 't actually possible to take photographs on the Moon. But returning to my original point: Surprisingly many people don 't know that NASA went six times to the Moon, and believe there was only one landing. Conspiracy theorists love to abuse this misconception by simply not making any mention of multiple
Conspiracy theorists believe that the moon landing was one of the biggest lies told not only to America, but to the whole world. They say it was fake because of a movie that was released back in 1968. They claim it was a hoax because you can’t see a camera reflection in a spacesuit. They know that the American flag shouldn’t appear to be flapping in the wind while in space. But this is just a small fraction of why conspiracy theorists believe that the Apollo
The Passengers of United Flight 93 On Tuesday, September 11, 2001, members of al Qaeda hijacked and crashed four American airliners. This attack on American soil resulted in nearly 1.4 million pounds of debris. The financial impact in New York alone was over $30.5 billion dollars (“22 Facts About 9/11”). It lead to three thousand deaths, including the deaths of first responders such as firemen and policemen (“9/11 Attacks”).
Many aspects in question cannot be explained thoroughly to accurately explain them. There are many things during the Apollo 11 missions that seem as if the astronauts are actors on a staged moon atmosphere. This will always and forever be one of the most debated and famous conspiracy theories ever. There are multiple sides for people to hold and believe in. Both sides offer some theories that are possible but the only ones who know the truth are the astronauts of Apollo 11.
There’s always someone who thinks they saw something or infers this or that or the other. But I need to get to the point because today we are going to, obviously, going to be talking about whether the American moon landings were real. I’ve got a stack of evidence just waiting to be talked about so let’s get started!
It is assumed by the people of Earth that the first two expeditions exploded on Mars. They have no reason to believe otherwise; they live in ignorance. Upon arriving on what the expeditioners believe to be Mars, Hinkston thinks the past expeditioners landed on Mars and simply stayed and made a life for themselves. Captain Black assures
One of the greatest space mission is the third mission to land on the Moon, Apollo 13. The Apollo 13 mission to the moon may have been the most miraculous event in history. Not only were the astronauts able to make it through any obstacle they faced, but they used their intellect in every situation. After getting through all the phases of getting through space, such as releasing certain parts of the shuttle and preparing their landing craft, they realize something’s wrong. Their oxygen tanks exploded!
Millions of people also say they were real. If they were faked then why? I’m Sam Burmeister and I think the moon landings were fake. There is lot’s of evidence supporting each side of the argument.
It was a great day for America as we won the “Space Race” and got safely to the moon, but not everyone was happy. In this essay, I will be talking about why some conspiracy theorists think that the historical moon landing of 1969 was staged and why I still believe that it was in fact, real. To begin, I will be showing you some evidence theorists use to support their claim of the landing being fake. The first is that when
Only a little time after, Apollo 11 was fixed and set for launch. July 16th, 1969, Apollo 11 left Earths atmosphere swimmingly and was headed straight for the moon. A short three days later, the crew arrived and became the first humans to step foot on the moon. The United States achieved their goal, and the USSR did not. Landing a man on the moon is still looked upon as one of the biggest scientific accomplishments in the history of mankind.
On July 20th, 1969, the Apollo 11 with astronaut Neil Armstrong and his crew, guided by thousands of NASA technicians, supposedly landed on the surface of the moon. It was certainly one of the most extraordinary events accomplished by mankind up to that date. Neil Armstrong’s first words upon stepping on the moon surface will always be remembered “ A small step for mankind, a giant leap for humanity”. Ever since then, this achievement has been a matter of discussion by several groups that either believed or disbelieved this.
Viewers and readers became aware of the effect that the moon landing
The first man on the moon On July 20, 1969, at 20:18 UTC Apollo 11 officially became the first space shuttle to land humans on the moon. On the 25th may 1961 president Kennedy expressed a concern that America was falling behind the Soviet Union in technology and set them a challenge, put a man on the moon before the end of the decade. On July 16th 1969
Some people believe that the moon rocks the astronauts brought back are actually from some kind of meteorite that might have crashed into the moon. The scientists can actually prove that the rocks
he was getting out of the moon lander. but who film him? In this evidence it is good, but the same thing I have been saying nobody knows the truth about the moon landing. In evidence 12 Neil Armstrong was getting out the moon lander to get on the moon well Neil could have brought somebody with him and told him to film him, then basically everybody say it is too hot to have a camera on the moon. Well they are astronauts they should have supplies so they can cover the camera on something so it would not burn in pieces.
“Fundamental to the conspiracy theory is our supposed inability to go to the Moon. The thought of humans traveling to the Moon was so fantastic even early science-fiction writers didn't predict it happening for centuries to come”(Villard). The rockets that made the moon landing possible were based upon the principles that were founded by Isaac Newton centuries ago, meaning that the underlying science was already there. The Saturn V rockets were more than capable of taking a man to the moon, and it was seen by thousands of eyewitnesses and media who saw the rocket blast off from the Kennedy space center in Florida (Villard). Those who claim that NASA could not reach the moon in the 1960’s discredit the hardworking engineers and scientists who paved the way for a lunar