On August 23, 1927, Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti were executed in one of the most iconic and infamous trials in American history. The 1920s fostered themes of nativism and xenophobia, fueled in part by the bombing of Wall Street, and further exemplified by the Johnson-Reed Act of 1925. The country was vigilant against all anti-capitalists. It is in this decade where Sacco and Vanzetti emerge. Accused of murder, the pair of Italian anarchists quickly found themselves in a one-sided court battle, one where the judge himself proclaimed Sacco and Vanzetti to be “anarchist bastards. ” Since that date, historians have argued on the attitudes surrounding this case that gained global attention throughout the 1920s. Immediately following …show more content…
The men were anarchists, who believed in taking radical measures. As such, Sacco and Vanzetti were believed followers of Luigi Galleani. Galleani was an anarchist on the radar of the U.S. government for advocating extreme violence including (but not limited to) bomb making and murder. On April 15th, 1920, a double murder was committed on Pearl Street, Braintree Massachusetts, next to the Slater-Morrill shoe factory. A security guard and paymaster were shot multiple times by a .32 caliber gun, and the payroll boxes that the men were transporting were stolen. Sacco and Vanzetti were in the Braintree area at the time, and when stopped by police, both vehemently denied any participation in the murders, and furthermore denied any gun ownership. When searched by police, Nicola Sacco had anarchist pamphlet materials and a .32 caliber Colt, not unlike the weapon used in the double homicide. Vanzetti possessed a .38 caliber revolver identical to the weapon missing from the slain security guard’s holster. (Reed, Barry C., "The Sacco-Vanzetti Case: The Trial of the Century", ABA Journal, August 1960, pp. 867–869) In the beginnings of the trial, the outlook did not appear well for the two Italian
The men in the car, described as Polish, with pale skin, in which Sacco as tan skin. Both defendants offered alibis, which supported, by several witnesses. Vanzetti testified that he sold fish at the time of the Braintree robbery. Sacco testified that he applied in Boston for a passport at the Italian embassy. Judge Thayer decided to deny may witnesses because of their race, Italian.
The Sacco Vanzetti trial was a trial that occurred during the time of the Red scare where people feared and accused others of communism. Unfortunately for these two italian men known as Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti were accused of robbery and murder at the Slater and Morrill shoe factory in South Braintree in 1921. Later on both men were executed on April, 9 1927. The Sacco and Vanzetti trial was considered a witch hunt due to the red scare and the little evidence that was disproven.
On the afternoon of April 15, 1920, payroll clerk Frederick Parmenter and security guard Alessandro Berardelli were shot to death and robbed of over $15,000 in cash in South Braintree, Massachusetts. After a few weeks, arrests were made and charges were brought against two Italian immigrants by the names of Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti. A well known attorney, Fred H. Moore, was brought in to defend Sacco and Vanzetti. The accused immigrants had no criminal records, but were known as outspoken anarchists, labor organizers, and antiwar activists. These activities were viewed with great suspicion during this time period.
(In 1921, while Warren Harding was president, the government commuted the sentences and deported the defendants to Russia.) Holmes Speaks Amid lingering war-time hysteria and fear of Bolshevism, the Supreme Court affirmed the convictions over the immortal dissent of Holmes. In what amounted to an eloquent essay, Holmes dispatched the majority’s decision,
Hannah Burton Mrs. Steveson LA II Adv. 21 April 2023 Sacco and Vanzetti Sacco and Vanzeetti were two Italian anarchists who were convicted of murder and robbery in the 1920s and people were outraged because they believed that their convictions and execution were unjust due to the discrimination of the time. People believed that the evidence that they found was not enough to prove without a doubt that they were guilty. Individuals believe there was bias in the justice system, causing them to not get the correct verdict. Looking at the crimes they were accused of, the convictions they received, and additional information that was introduced after their initial conviction; Sacco & Vanzetti were victims of discrimination who were wrongly executed for crimes.
Chicago’s Memorial Day massacre on May 30, 1937 is a famous account of the violence that the labor class suffered. It was a day that thousands of people that were a part of the protest suffered brutally at the hands of the Chicago police department. The author focuses on the incidents of the police brutality that protestors faced while attempting to protest in front of the steel company. She focuses on how these political organizations refuted the facts buy releasing inaccurate reports of the incident to reframe the public opinions. The article reveals accounts of the struggles and the injustice that the protestors faced through She also stresses the power of cultural history.
San Piedro is an island containing about 5,000 people. Fishing and strawberry fields are the main sources of income for the residents. Citizens’ houses are close together, and Amity Harbor is the island’s only town. The island has huge green hills and many fields that are filled with alfalfa, feed corn, and strawberries. During the winter, which is the time of the trial, Amity Harbor can become covered in sheets of snow.
Over the course of American history, various court cases have significantly impacted the countries future. Two court cases that greatly shaped the future of America are the Scopes trial, by determining boundaries between evolution and the bible, and the Plessy versus Ferguson trial, by affecting racial discrimination towards blacks. The Scopes trial shaped the future of America by examining what public schools have a right to teach, and specifically debating the boundaries between education and religion. After World War I, a religious belief in the priority of the Bible over all human knowledge became popular in society, while Darwin’s theory of evolution was seen as a threat.
Through a comprehensive understanding of the motivations and underlying factors of the rioters in Baltimore, a deeper interpretation of post-revolutionary nationalism may be revealed. This gained knowledge would help twenty-first century Americans understand current nationalist trends and movements while such movements interact with contemporary political and socioeconomic variables. Therefore, the relatively peaceful demonstrations and assemblies common in the early republic unexpectedly turned violent in Baltimore City during the summer of 1812 because of the Federalist and Democratic-Republican politics and their interactions with the nationalistic, yet diverse, groups of wage laborers in Baltimore
During the 1920s, there was a lot of change going on in the country. The automobile industry, the airplane industry, newer modern corporations and management styles, and newer machinery all boosted the economy, and electricity was used. Cities grew as new jobs became available. The 20s saw presidents Warren Harding and all his scandals, Calvin Coolidge, and Herbert Hoover. In the 20s, we were boosting from the economy, and making our market global.
Leo Frank was a white, Jewish, superintendent of a pencil factory in Atlanta, Georgia where the body of Mary Phagan, one of the factories’ workers, was found. The murder of the thirteen year old girl prompted outrage in the city of Atlanta and around the country, and in a highly controversial trail, Leo Frank was quickly given the death sentence. Frank’s sentence would later be changed to life in prison, but while he was in a jail hospital, a mob broke in and lynched Frank on the outskirts of Mary Phagan’s hometown. The trial of Leo Frank is unique in both its ability to spark controversy up to the present day, and its ability to highlight the social tensions of America and Atlanta, one of the countries busiest cities. With a new progressive
Dayton, Tennessee July 1925, The State of Tennessee vs. John Thomas Scopes. One of the most publicized trials in American history that held a great impact on the argument between fundamentalists and modernists. The Scopes Trial is still one of the most significant trials in American history. It was actually a case that had a broader importance, rather than a case about evolution in schools and the case has left a lasting impression on America. The State of Tennessee vs. John Thomas Scopes took place in the hot summer of 1925 Dayton, Tennessee and featured the likes of John Scopes, Clarence Darrow, and William Jennings Bryan.
History Vs. Hollywood: The Untouchables The Untouchables is an action packed movie, set in Chicago, 1920s. Crime controls the city, the system has gone corrupt, and people are dying.
As America saw an end to World war 1 and entered the 1920s, the country was faced with rapid changes in American society. These changes challenged the old traditional American values and introduced tension between modernists and traditionalist. Tension grew in churches and schools after new scientific discoveries were being made which supported the idea of evolution, rather than the bible. American society saw dramatic changes in it’s old, familiar culture as the Harlem Renaissance emerged and women gained more rights, which began taking affect on the customary American lifestyle. After World War 1, science became the main contributing factor to the controversy over religion during the 1920s.
Criminology Case Study: Meredith Kercher Name Academic Institution Author Note Class Professor Date TABLE OFCONTENTS1 CASE/OFFENDER 3 OFFENSE/CRIME 4 MOTIVATIONS/BACKGROUND 4 THEORY 5 VICTIMS 6 COSTS 7 ADJUDICATION/DISPOSITION (PROSECUTION/SENTENCING) 7 CONCLUSION 8 REFERENCES 10 Criminology Case Study: Meredith Kercher