Questions:
Who is (was) Gerda Lerner, and why should or shouldn 't you (your opinion) trust her arguments about Women 's History? Google her.
Since the 1969s,Gerda Lerner was one of the most influential figures in the development of women’s and gender. Lerner was a scholar, with a doctorate in history, and an author legitimized the study of women and their lives.She dedicated decades to legitimizing Women’s History, and have it be apart of school’s curriculum. She was also accredited for the creation for the first graduate program in women’s history in the United States. Therefore, by stating a few of Gerda Lerner’s accomplishments i do think her arguments should be trusted.
What is "compensatory" history of women, and what are its
…show more content…
Compensatory History examines any given stage of history through the different classes of women, and their experiences.Unfortunately, this does not allow us to understand the “activities” majority of women partook in, or what the significance of these “activities” had on society as a whole.The reason there is a need for a different type of history is because we cannot fully understand the importance of women in history with limited information. For example, being able to understand how women evolve and alter in a “male-defined society” will give us significant insight of how they were cognitively and physically able to bring change, as well as the effects the changes continue to have on today 's …show more content…
Women’s Rights of History Women 's studies women 's-rights struggles. Furthermore, it studies Women 's Rights leaders, and the winning of suffrage. The limits that this places on the history of women is that Women 's right’s has been a major focus, and as Lerner states “ it cannot and should not be its central concern”. Focusing on one aspect of history will make light of the other events that contribute to the history of women that are just as important, which why another type of history is needed.
What is "women 's sphere" history of women, and what are its limits or shortcomings? Why is there a need for a different type of women 's history? Provide an example. Woman 's sphere explores society 's educational ideals, values that women are influenced by, and gender role assimilation.As Carl Degler points out we confuse ‘prescriptive literature with actual behavior”. Contribution History places limitations of learning women’s contributions to history because monographs are not of what women really did,but what men in society thought women should do.Thus, it is evident with such limitations that another form of history is necessary to better understand women in history.
What is "transitional history", and do you think it is a more complete/comprehensive way of doing
She decides to include a description of women’s work which is important because women’s work is frequently left out of historical accounts instead Fenn chooses to highlight how important their role was by explaining in great detail the type of work women did. Since Fenn decided to reference numerous short stories within each chapter she needed to show how she was going to how the different stories were relevant to her story and she achieved this through the use of effective titles. Fenn writes the story using both the past and the present so she can insert her own journey into the story the going back and forth helps keep the content fresh and exciting. While many times history books can become dull or overloaded with content Fenn’s personal experiences are well timed and offer lighter material. Finally even though Fenn focuses on the Mandan she is successfully able to incorporate key transformations that were occurring elsewhere in the United States and Europe.
In conclusion, the author, Kathleen Ernst, talks about how women’s lives changed from before the civil war, and after the civil war. In the beginning of the passage, before the civil war, the author states that women were only good for tending the wounded and taking care of the babies and children. However towards the end of the passage, after the civil war, she tells that women were given new opportunities because of the independence that the war
Women’s Rights Movement The Women’s Rights Movement in the 19th century was an effort by women protesting to gain equality with men. Women at the time were denied many rights. The rights movement first started in 1848 when a group of women met to discuss protesting, the first gathering of its time. During the movement women gained many rights that they were fighting for but It wasn’t until 1920 that all states ratified the right for women to vote, therefore wrapping up the 19th century Women’s Rights Movement. This Women’s Rights Movement was important for various reasons, but the most important reason was that if it wasn’t for this movement, today women may not have all the rights that they do.
In her essay she explains how the way that women make it into history books is very much so backwards. Women made history by misbehaving and standing out. An example would
“A Jury of Her Peers” is a valuable resource for anyone curious to what life was like for women in the twentieth century for which it demonstrates women struggling to publish and define
Thus, it is necessary to conclude that women have always played an important role in the development of history. History that involves women has been developed throughout the centuries, constantly changing its goals and forms, increasing the popularity movement of the American women in the late 1800’s. Women were discriminated for many things for a very long time, it wasn’t until the late 1800’s that women actually started to gain very few rights. The late 1800’s is very important time for women as it gets the movement started for Women’s Suffrage, and ultimately the late 1800’s starts to open the way for equality for women and
It is universally acknowledged that society is made up of two parts—the men and the women. The Ottoman empire was no exception. From the 13th century to the early 20th, the Ottoman empire held a central role in the world of global politics, commerce, and culture. They conquered vast lands, spread Islam, and created a rich and glimmering culture. But, one must recognize that women, because they make up half of the population, played an important role in Ottoman society as romantic partners and financial agent; however, women were also dealt the role of being subservient to men.
But what is rarely mentioned is all the behind the scenes work women were responsible for while men were off fighting in the military. The war disrupted their ordinary lives, and the everyday roles men were employed in needed to be filled. Women throughout the United States assumed untraditional roles to so that life would continue, now being involved in politics, factories, businesses, commanding the household, and helping during
Women’s responsibilities increased especially at work and war. Women, even today are discriminated because of their gender, so there is still no equality between both genders which should stop. Many women worked in the work force. According to an article, “For the first time, women
With the rise of civilization also came the rise of patriarchy-based societies and the slow decline of the importance of women in society. For the longest time the history of the world has been written by men who have been the head of the patriarchy and have forgotten the role of women in history. It is important to realize that women do in fact have a place at the table with men when it comes to importance in history, and are not just the ones cooking and serving the meal. It is women who tasked with raising the next generation. By looking at women of the past, people of the future can learn and evolve to fight oppression and gain their own power.
Even during major events and wars, they were expected to assume roles that were merely supportive of men. However, despite all the boundaries that society set for them, women did not stand, watching the ongoing cycle of life from their windows; they fought and worked hard to achieve a reassessment of the traditional
I want to understand the evolution of women’s right in order to fully comprehend our stance on women today. I believe that this topic is particularly interesting as it depicts a minority group that was affected by these tensions in contrasting ways to other minority groups. Additionally, I find the effect of Italian Fascism and German Nazism fascinating and l want to be able to understand more deeply the effect they had on women at a time when women did not have rights, as we understand them today In Europe of 1914, men were still ‘rulers’ of their households. Women did not have the right to testify against their husband, own property by themselves, or make decisions regarding the education of their children.
Over generations, the role of women in society has shifted and changed immensely, improving upon many aspects of rights and values that women have. The changes occurred gave women opportunities to provide ideas, to have the same rights as men, giving women freedom, leading to many contributions of many significant and valuable events. But from current roles of women being equal to those of men, how women stood in ancient society significantly differs and contrast with ours today. Throughout history, the role and significance of women were always outweighed by the dominance and influence of men. The role of women in ancient times varied throughout, depending on the place and area in the world, in which women had different roles and impacts on their own society.
Besides this message, the author also strongly proves that society’s oppression and inflexible mindset is the main factor that limits people in improving and thus leaving them with only one resource of happiness, the past. Now, this argument all ties back to the question in the beginning of this essay, “Why does our world truly need any equality?” People have to realize that the fight for gender equality is the biggest revolution that has been occurring for so many generations, as people cannot even trace back to the beginning of this fight. However, the reason behind this ridiculous length of the revolution is people’s misuse of memories and history. Instead of referring back to memories for happiness or satisfaction, people should move forward and improve their present lives in order to be satisfied.
The ability to be assertive or decisive is in fact a defining factor the identity of a woman. As a woman goes through life and its experiences, she draws from her surrounding and conclusions which will affect the choices she makes. Hardly appealing to society back then, this act of being assertive arouses an actual response at the same time that it invites attention on the rights of women as well as the status of women in the social hierarchy. This eventually draws a fine line between the male and female subject. The ability of women to make decisions eventually bridges the gap between them and the patriarchs and this, provides a sense of sights and hearing for both parties to achieve an agreement to what is right.