“If my future were determined just by my performance on a standardized test, I wouldn't be here. I guarantee you that.” - Michelle Obama. Standardized testing has been enforced for public schools all around America since the 2002 No Child Left Behind Act. This exam has lead to many complications though for many students. Anxiety and depression rates skyrocket around testing time and mess with both mental and physical health for children. Plus, testing is discriminatory against students with learning disabilities or non-english speakers. Lastly, it genuinely doesn’t improve anything and it’s not a reliable source to measure a student’s intelligence. Although the testing material may prepare students for college, it assembles chaos among students; they shouldn't have to take it; moreover, America should abolish standardized testing and the public should be aware of all the harm it’s causing. To begin standardized testing causes a wave of anxiety for students. Majority of students are very intellectual but, are not good test takers. Anxiety and sometimes even depression rates are high during standardized testing time. What …show more content…
A student could perform well on a test but that doesn’t make them smart; they could’ve cheated or just simply memorized something that they will probably forget in a few month. On the other hand, a student could perform profoundly atrocious but that doesn’t mean they’re dumb; they’re probably not exceptional test takers or blanked out because they were nervous. Standardized testing shouldn't be a source to see if a student is smart or not. Andy Hudlow once said “The goal of standardized testing is not to find out how well you think through problems, or if you can express your opinions, or create a presentation, the goal is to find out what you were able to memorize” This quote is accurate in many ways because students mostly care about passing not about problem
Some may argue that standardized tests are an accurate measure of one's academic level, a good way to see if they are being taught what they need to be taught, and if they are smart enough to get into a college or school. Standardized tests have existed for a very long time, even ancient Greece used similar tests.. A researcher from law.journal.ku.edu states, “This testing began in 1901 after the creation of the College Entrance Examination Board”(Naughton 264). So, standardized tests are not a new concept and they continue to exist. Some may believe that standardized tests are a way to test how well a teacher is at teaching.
The tests aren’t very accurate, sure you know how to fill in a bubble, but you don’t learn how to think for yourself. If the answer's not a b c or d you don’t know how to answer it. Standardized test are seriously crippling our critical thinking skills. Now the tests interfere with seniors eligibility to graduate. Students wait in agony for the results of these tests to come in and it adds more stress to an
Standardized testing has not improved education in America. Standardized tests have been issued in schools all across the nation for years now. Some people like them and some people don’t. They do not help the student learn more information than they would without the tests. The U.S. has dropped from 18th highest scores in schools in the world to be in the 30’s on almost all of the subjects on the test.
Instead, the boss will present a problem and expect its employees to come up with solutions to this problem , anticipated to be presented for discussion later that week. It is expected, in whatever career, to know simple skills like problem solving and even how to write a well-educated report based on research. Many schools have switched over to standardized testing as an accurate measure of a student’s, teacher, and a school’s success. However, evidence shows that standardized tests lead to stress, most importantly,
In America, there is quite a lengthy history of standardized testing. It all began in 1838 when the American education system began to form ideas of having tests that would be transformed into formal measures of student academic achievement. They were originally created to hopefully show student improvement and academic knowledge, which is also their most common use up to today. The commonly dreaded standardized test, the ACT, was created in order to help more colleges improve their enrollment numbers, and colleges needed a new standardized test in order to do so. But lately, these forms of standardized testing seem to be causing damage to students.
The idea that one test can accumulate all of one student’s academic abilities is no longer accurate. Today, the standardized tests that are used not only discriminate against the non wealthy families, it also is not an accurate reading of all of one’s abilities in and out of school. The tests also have become such a huge focus in the classroom that it is beginning to take away the process of learning in a classroom and being replaced with memorization to get good test scores. The standardized tests do not need to disappear all together, however the tests need a lot of revising if the states continue to use them as they do
Standardized testing (SATs), in the United States has been present for years and has caused plenty of teachers, students, parents, and other individuals who are informed about it to have different perspectives and opinions on it. Before doing my research on the different opinions people had on standardized tests, I always believed they were encouraged by professors and school facilities. As a student myself and on the behalf of other students, standardized tests were always perceived to be stressful and unjust. Test taking was never a strength of mine especially if the test was timed because it just added more pressure to answer the questions quick. In high school, my teachers never discussed how they felt towards the SATs, which made
All students dread one thing when it comes to school - testing. Standardized test are the main focus in our school systems instead of actually gaining knowledge at the end of the year. As a mother, Michelle Rhee, understands the lack of attention given on education as a whole instead of just waiting on the scores, but she still agrees on continuing with standardized test. Kristina Rizga opposes the opinion of Michelle Rhee as she does not believe standardized test truly measure the intelligence of a student. Kristina Rizga proves her stand against standardized test by utilizing solid use of argumentation.
Unfortunately, standardized testing only gives a rough estimate of what a student can do or knows. It is impossible to tell if a student will improve, or even tell if the student just guessed on all of their answers for the test. This explains how standardized tests do not measure the correct information that school’s are actually searching
Educational companies that produce these tests are ordinarily doing it for profit, the same tests are produced and used for the same things, evaluation of effectiveness of teachings on students, performance of teachers, classes, how well schools are doing overall, rather than individual tests and observation methods for different categories. These companies are more in the business for the financial aspect and acquisition they would earn from this, rather than enriching the minds of the new generation. The standardized tests do not provide any ways for students to improve and develop off of their test results. They are not being taught how to think, how to be inventive and imaginative, instead about memorization of content. (Armstrong, 1)
Standardized Tests: Right or Wrong? Diane Ravitch, a historian of education, once said that, “sometimes the most brilliant and intelligent students do not shine in standardized tests because they do not have standardized minds.” These tests have been a part of American education since the mid-1800s(Is the Use), but now, many people are starting to realize that standardized tests are not as convenient as they thought they were. In 2002, the No Child Left Behind Act required all schools in the United States to test students in grades two through twelve annually in reading, math, and science(Is the Use). But since then, the U.S. has dropped from 18th in the world in mathematics to 36th, with a similar change in science as well.
In fact 70 percent of educators surveyed in 2015 say that tests are not developmentally appropriate. Furthermore many students suffer a great deal of stress because of standardized tests. What’s most shocking is that instead of lower income schools getting better after tests were implemented they have actually gotten worse. School could essentially be taught by robots. At this point most teachers in my district have to teach a curriculum that is developed by the state instead of their own curriculum.
The tests are ineffective because they don’t measure all of what the students know, and what is important. The text stated, “Standardized Tests are IQ tests from one-hundred years ago. They are outdated.” Some reasons to why Standardized Tests are ineffective are that they don’t measure student’s creativity, and they make students feel they aren’t smart. In the 1950’s they only tested every two years.
Students may become overwhelmed while studying for and taking the test in the high-stress situation that standardized testing creates, clouding their ability to complete questions ("Maths + Anxiety = Poor Test Performance And Cognitive Function, Says Researcher." para 9). Furthermore, standardized testing also does not acknowledge differences in economic backgrounds of students. Students from affluent families with educated parents possess a great advantage in resources and tend to live in areas with better public schools. Therefore, they score better on standard examinations (Bhattacharyya, Junot, and Clark para.
To begin with, standardized tests are not wholly reflective of a student’s knowledge.