Gladwell article was disagreeable due to the fact of his theory. His theory stated that teens are rebellious and that they will join a riot without even thinking.. In the article, Gladwell talks about a boy name John LaDue and how he tried to shoot up his school, kill his family, along with killing himself. Gladwell would think he was abused by one of his family members when he was just a little boy. For some people that would be wrong and that wouldn't be the case and for others they would agree with Gladwell. But in this case Gladwell is wrong. Gladwell theory was wrong and incorrect. Is this article wrong because of Gladwell theory? Gladwell states that John LaDue was making a bomb that was called a Molotov Cocktail. Gladwell put in the article of John’s talking to a cop about what was in the bomb. For example, “he told Schroeder, listing various kinds of explosive power, thousands of ball bearings, pipes for pipe bombs, fifteen pounds of potassium perchlorate, …show more content…
Officer Schroeder was talking to LaDue and trying to figure out things. Officer Schroder put LaDue’s journal on the table and LaDue got worried and wondered how he got his journal. So officer Schroeder asked him about the disturbing things in LaDue’s journal and John LaDue told Schroeder word for word. LaDue said “I want to tear a throat out with my own teeth like a pop can. I want to gut someone with my hand, to tear a head off and rip out the heart and lungs from the neck, to stab someone in the gut, shove it up their heart,” (Gladwell 4). Gladwell and viewers would agree that a teen that writes something like that in their journal they have something wrong with them. Something that wasn't right in his years that happen to him that made him this way. Gladwell thinks he might have been abused by a person in his childhood years and that could be the reason John could be feeling this
As of right now police are trying to find out if there are any other people that helped Mark create the bombs. The article is dark and horrifying and talks about how there
Responsibility Over Living Sigmund Freud once said, “Most people do not really want freedom because freedom involves responsibility and most people are frightened of responsibility.” This quote in my opinion means that even though most people say they want freedom to do whatever they want, they really don’t because they’re too scared to accept responsibility for their actions. The character John hurt a lot of people in this novel because he is too afraid to be responsible. He would rather have a party than take care of a sick man’s house. He is not a good role model.
He used quotes from an expert, Greg Carl, to help to validate his information, but he could have used more information from sources. Although, he had creditable quotes; Dillow ultimately told a story rather than informing the reader. Telling a story is important for a writer to be able to do, but not when the purpose is to inform. In addition, the reader might learn more if pictures of what he was explaining were included when he was discussing the bombs. In fact, diagrams of objects being described will help the reader to not only better understand what’s being discussed, but also help them to broaden their knowledge.
The purpose that the author had in writing this was to show people how and why some idea, trend, or behavior spreads throughout society. Another reason is to show how greatly people are influenced by there surrounding rather than their own genes and personality. A passage in this book that really shows that was on page 165: "...a seminary student literally stepped over the victim as he hurried on his way." This surprised me because I would think a seminary student who is good to give a speech about helping others would be able to help out someone clearly in need. I was very interested in how this man, regardless of how good of a man he was, was influenced strongly by the fact that he was in a hurry.
“To Catch a Bombmaker” by Clay Dillow appeared in Popular Science in October 2015. Catching a Bombmaker does not come easy; you must have intelligence, surveillance, and knowledge behind the science of a bomb. In “To Catch a Bombmaker” these three things led to a terrorist being caught in the action. Mr. Dillow’s purpose for writing this piece is to inform. Dillow is very professional in his writing.
To support his claim, Weller adds that Bradbury’s article for The Nation in 1953 clearly shows that censorship was at the “forefront of his mind” when he wrote the novel. Thus, he successfully clarifies the controversial issue regarding the theme of censorship in Fahrenheit 451. A memorable saying I picked up from this article is, “Fahrenheit 451 is less about Big Brother and more about Little Sister” (Bradbury). By this, Weller explains that in Bradbury’s fictional universe, “Big Brother is less instrumental in the censorship of books than the citizens themselves who no longer care about the joy of reading.” Although Huxley’s Brave New World is similar to Fahrenheit 451, I prefer the latter, because it is simpler and easier to relate it to the world today.
Malcom Gladwell’s “The Physical Genius” and Mike Rose’s “The Working Life of a Waitress” each write about how people can be the best at what they do. Gladwell explained the idea of physical genius, or having the spectacular affinity for translating thought into action in a way no one else in their respective fields can. Physical genius despite its name, is the mental ability to chunk information, mentally practice, and have a special feel that others don't have. Gladwell used exemplary examples like Charlie Wilson, Yo-Yo Ma, and Tony Gwynn although he missed the opportunity to include any blue color jobs or women. Mike Rose wrote primarily about the interview with his mother who spent her life mastering the art of waitressing.
The Nazi’s had recruited two allies to work as double agents, who misinformed them that their bombs had hit their targets. When politicians in London learned of this, they were left to play God. Ultimately, Winston Churchill decided that the double agents should continue to inform the Nazi’s they had executed their target. Although poorer communities would suffer, politicians estimated they could save as many as 10,000 lives by redirecting the bombs, (Edmonds, 6). Throughout his novel, Edmonds presents readers with similar situations and asks them what they would do and explains how the majority of people reach their decision.
The book Sunrise Over Fallujah by Walter Dean Myers is about a young man named Birdy that is serving in the Iraq War as part of one of the Civil Affairs units. Overall Sunrise Over Fallujah was an accurate representation of the Civil Affairs units, what they did in the Iraq War, and certain challenges that they faced. The book described in detail what would have possibly happened to a Civil Affairs untits while serving during the Iraq War. One challenge for the Civil Affairs unit in the book is the improvised explosive devices in the roads. These are brought up numerous times throughout the novel and pose a serious risk to the soldiers.
Knowledge and Ignorance in Fahrenheit 451 Imagine a society where all books are banned from the public and if any are found they are burned into ashes. This is a reality in the novel Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury, which delves deep into problems a society becoming more and more dependant on technology may face. In Fahrenheit 451 Ray Bradbury shows many problems which range from technology to violence, one important topic that is discussed is knowledge and the theme that a society cannot function without knowledge You can clearly see this idea starting to form within the first few pages of the novel, when the protagonist Guy Montag has an interaction with a girl named Clarisse. As they are talking Guy Montag says “You think too many things”(pg 9).
Through the development of Montag, the main character of Ray Bradbury’s dystopian novel, Fahrenheit 451, the importance of freedom of thought and ideas is not only stressed, but shown as an ideal worth dying for. “It was a pleasure to burn.”
Fahrenheit 451 has an astonishingly accurate future depiction of a society in which everyone is too distracted by technology, so they ignore most of the world around them. The community members are not aware of nature or other human beings, and they never take time to actually think deeply about life and ideas in general. Many high school and middle school teach this book in curriculums nationwide, because the addiction to technology and hatred of books portrayed in the book is beginning to be prevalent in our society. This book also glorifies individuality by admiring a girl who is different from everyone else. In the past, many parents have decided to challenge this book due to the violence, the religious discrimination, the foul language, and the references to drinking and smoking.
We can see at the start of the novel that Jono is seen as rebellious and only hangs out with his friends to escape that fact that he is depressed, reading Jono’s part at the start of the novel reminded me of when I was going through a depressive state of my life and instead of healing and focusing on myself, I hung out with my friends and mucking around with friends. Reading the development of Jono shows that finding that one person can change everything and how it impacts you in a good and positive way. I also related to in the novel is how Jono’s depression affected his relationship with his father and affects Jono himself “Black and endless, I force myself to stand and start the day.” On page 6, by using figurative language, diction and inner thoughts and feelings it shows his depression and how he doesn’t feel anything. This quote stuck out to me because I remember when I was going through something, I was always struggle getting out of bed and getting ready for school.
Gladwell’s Argument In the novel Outliers, Gladwell argues that individuals who are successful are not just talented, but are shaped by their oppurtunities, lives, culture, and personal advantages. To prove his point, Gladwell frequently uses specific examples to demonstrate how success can be attributed to more than just talent. One of the unique advantages that successful individuals possess is when they were born. Gladwell explains that, “For a young would be lawyer, being born in the early 1930s was a magic time, just as being born in 1955 was for a software programmer, or being born in 1835 was for an entrepreneur” (Gladwell 137).
John was known by some as the Beast king. He was of Filipino descent and he was a really really closed up guy. There was this strange invisible wall which made it hard to approach him. He was betrayed by all his really really close friends(the other kings of humanity).John suicided when the closest thing that he had a crush which he never understood that she loved him although he said it multiple times in his monologues that he isn 't dense and his crush actually betrayed him. She actually sided with the demon army which was a really bad thing like the other humanity kings did and it broke Johns heart so HARD.