Here it is, another season of blood sweat and tears. Wear and tear on your body over and over and over again. A grueling process in which time is your worst enemy, because when that time runs out, an injury comes flying in and you’re left alone. There is a big misconception of how student athletes are treated. For years student athletes have sacrificed themselves for a sport, but get nothing in return. Student athletes are overlooked and when it comes down to it, frankly, are not respected. Sure a small percent get famous but what happens to the rest of the athletes. If you don’t perform to a certain extent, colleges cast a dark cloud over you and try to hide your existence. Some live with the bare minimum because they can’t afford simple needs like food and clothing. This disgusting cycle of …show more content…
The NCAA policies for insurance with student athletes is absurd. They let the colleges decide whether or not they want to pay for medical insurance. It doesn’t even cover everyone, only a select few sports. Thus, leaving the athletes and family confused. This shows that the NCAA, a “non-profit organization”, who makes millions off college players, refuses to pay for the students athletes hard work and sacrifice they put in. Out of all the money they make, they can’t just take some out and support the backbone of their money flowing dynasty? Some may say that student athletes should not get paid because they are only on an amature playing level. However, they are missing the whole point that these student athletes can’t afford these outrageous medical fees. Pay the players for their work, that’s all. Give them a little something to survive. Not only do these players fall in a pit of medical debt, they also are being used for making money while their scholarship grants won't even cover the tuition, food, books, and all the other simple needs in a college
Sack states a fact when he says, “In 1957, after years of intense internal debate, the NCAA caved under pressure to subsidize athletes, and voted to allow athletic scholarships” (Sack). This tells the audience that at some point in time, athletic scholarships were not allowed, but were strictly academic. The author begins with how the NCAA officially let scholarships be awarded but later in the article he says that, over time, they have turned into more of an “employment contract” (Sack). The author also states “Because they are already essentially paid to play, they deserve the same rights and benefits as other employees, including medical benefits, workers' compensation when injured, and the right to use their God-given talents to build some financial security for their families while still in college” (Sack).
A lot of sports recruits come from the inner city, country or a humble environment. Going to college is a completely new and different experience. A large portion of players are trying to adjust in the classroom and feel inferior in more ways than we care to realize. Many of the students at major universities in the United States typically come from families that have incomes that are above the national average. These players are asked to come to the college’s where they are not socially equal but they are expected to feel good about the situation and themselves.
Why college athletes should be paid School competitors are controlled each day. Understudy competitors are working without stopping for even a minute to meet scholarly principles and to keep their level of play focused. These competitors should be remunerated and credited for their accomplishments. Are these competitors not being compensated as well as living with no cash. Since the competitors are living off of no cash they are exceptionally powerless against taking cash from promoters and others that are willing to bail them out.
Money decimates what was important before. In addition, “They [Panel of NCAA] also expressed concerns about the possibility of creating a financial distraction from the athlete’s academic career and the complications of determining the amount for an appropriate stipend (The daily Texan). The money would trigger the athletes to put education in the past. That would create an issue within the college because the sole purpose of college is education. Without education colleges would not exist.
To begin, “Collegiate student athletes put everything on the line — their physical health, future career prospects and years of their lives to compete” “(Paying-College-Athletes)”. They practice hard so they can play on national TV like the players that make money. They have been training for the sport they play their whole life. Colleges receive money from students who play football, and even though they receive a degree for the pressure they put on their bodies they never receive a dollar “(Paying-College-Athletes)”. Athletes get injuries by getting hit, running, and jumping and all this comes back to them later in life.
Kids these days. They go to school and do academic work plus they do extra things out of their day. These college athletes have a chance to be pro and all pro athletes get paid. Students who don’t get scholarships and have to pay their way into college, could be playing a college sport and earning their money back. If their good enough to be on a team they could have a chance to go big.
They spend countless hours practicing, traveling, and competing, all while trying to balance their academics. Many of them come from low-income backgrounds and could use the money to support themselves and their families. Additionally, college sports generate a lot of revenue for universities, and it seems unfair that the athletes who are actually responsible for producing that revenue don't see any of it. However, there are some arguments against paying student athletes.
College athletes put in a lot of time, effort, and work into the sport they’ve played since they were young, but they aren’t getting paid for it. These student athletes deserve to be paid because they put in countless hours of hard work and balance sports with school work. The first reason athletes in college do deserve to be compensated is because they don 't have time to fit in work with a school and athletic schedule. College athletes don’t have time to get a real job. Student athletes have a very busy schedule, they don’t have time to fit in a job.
"Students are not professional athletes who are paid salaries. They are receiving access to a college education through their participation in sports, for which they earn scholarships to pay tuition, fees, room and board, and other allowable expenses." (TIMES) In most cases premier athletes only come for one year, until they can leave and possibly make millions, I think most college students would be alright with being broke for a year if they knew they had that type of fortune in their
The NCAA says that they don’t want to pay college athletes because of their scholarships. As the money keeps flowing more and more each and every year, it comes with more arguments about the athletes getting the money that they deserve. Sounds as if college athletes are blindly signing a sheet of paper and the NCAA has an evil smirk saying “You have no idea what you’ve gotten yourself into”. A court case had also gone down about a young college athlete and a car dealership. The dealership was using the athletes to make more sales with his cars and was doing behind the athletes back without
Are they students or employees? They spend more time with the sport than in school. Student athletes should be acknowledged for their performances. College athletes should be paid to play because they bring money into the school, advertisement, and they perform the same tasks of pros. College kids bring in thousands of dollars every game day.
Athletes who play football or basketball are at a higher risk of career ending injuries. These two sports are the hardest on an athletes body. Only one out of twenty-five college athletes go pro, so why put your body at risk when you don’t receive anything for doing that and your chances of going pro are slim? A lot of these student athletes are stressed out because of schoolwork participating in a college sport. This is just another reason that these athletes deserve to be
What college athletes don’t understand is that they are getting exposure to getting a professional contract. If that doesn’t work they will always have a college education to lean back on. They give generous scholarships to top student athletes receive, covering their tuition and most
The argument made by these two professors state that Division 1 players qualify as employees under Federal Labor Laws. Since players are under this law, the McCormick’s feel players should get financially compensated due to the physical rigors and balance education simultaneously (Cooper, 2011). It’s unbelievable how this couple thinks Division 1 athletes should get paid. The privilege to attend a university that is costly on full scholarship should be more than enough. Furthermore, student-athletes received stipends as an allowance assist with their livelihood.
This is a highly debated topic for college sports fans and most fans focus on the idea that these athletes are taken care of and that the ones in the big money sports such as basketball, football, and maybe baseball will make a ton of money so why should we help them. I feel that people miss the point