Why Did The South Want To Secede Essay

Overall, this move proved to cause more conflict than it did resolve, as this fueled the rebellious South Carolina in the latter years into more intense emotions of wanting a secession. This was a big event, due to the fact that it showed how strongly the South believed in their own rights, by disregarding the Federal Government they show early acts of treason, and they could not predict how many lives would be lost in the conflict between the two regions, and how impactful the war would be, changing the nation for the rest of the

If they joined the Southern States then the Union might have lost the Civil War. If Maryland seceded then Lincoln and the capitol would have been surrounded by hostile enemies and the capitol might have been

The Civil War in 1865 and Reconstruction in 1865-1877 is the reason for peace and good relations with other states. In other words, it typically brought America together, and that is key for a good nation. The effects the Civil War had on the U.S becoming a nation was significantly dramatic. This includes when the two regions that were having slavery at the time, causing a bad perspective on the U.S., the Civil War had put an end to that slavery. Over 3 million of slaves have finally gotten their freedom.

The Civil War maintained the union and freed the slaves. Reconstruction excluded the political focus on certain areas. However slaves were freed. They gained civil liberties and lost long term racial action. The union needed to effectively bring the south back to position, and the interest in the economy.

President Lincoln listed the states as in rebellion, which meaned they seceded. First, the Confederates declared their independence, with the South forming their own government. Also, it would take responsibiligy for their actions more and be more likely to unionize if the south admitted they left the union and tried to agree to terms to rejoin. At first, their would be a strong government presence in the south to enforce the laws and equality reconstruction for which reconstruction aims.

Though the south still had farming, and had joined the union, the south never bounced back to its former self after being decimated in the Civil War. The entire face of the southern economic system changed and their infrastructure was left in ruins after the battles. However before the start of the Civil War, there was a rush of southern pride throughout the south. Many southern residents had a fierce loyalty to their way of life and would die defending it. Thus being one of the main factors in the Civil War.

This whole situation caused controversy and anger feelings. Even though there wouldn’t be an agreement because of those who accepted slavery to happen and a war would end up happening the government could have ended it by agreeing with the northern states, and instead of seeing those who fought for their rights being killed they should have just set laws favoring all citizens, and not letting violence happen and creating a bigger problem. There were ways to solve a situation like this instead of choosing violence. The civil war could have been prevented if there was union, but instead of choosing other ways they decided to divide and have opposing sides that only caused

As the tensions between the North and the South keep growing, we have to look at the secession of the Southern states and if this act will help or hinder the debate brought about between the two territories. One of the first things we need to inspect is the differences between the two. Then we need to get down to the core and see why there are major issues between the North and the South. Finally, after we go through the facts, I will present my opinion on whether or not secession is necessary and if it is or isn’t the right route to take in order to resolve the conflicts separating the United States.

If the South didn’t agree to terms that the United States stood for,they shouldn’t have been allowed to join it. What really happened? America ended up looking very similar to how it did before the Civil War. Slavery was abolished, but other systems similar to it, such as Black Codes and convict leasing, existed. The Confederacy was defeated, but its members easily came back into the United States government and kept sharing ideas.

‘Slavery was the root cause of secession’. ‘November 6 1860, Lincoln was elected president of America which resulted in panic emerging in the South’ . The election of Lincoln as president who was a Republican leader meant that ideologies, movements and values from the North would be implemented in the South which meant the abolition of slavery. Slavery was a huge characteristic of the South as the economy; politics; social status and psychological mind-sets were influenced by the process of slavery. The southern white population then derived the idea of secession which meant the South would gain independence from Northern aggression .

The Civil War was a predictable, it could not have been avoided. President Lincoln tried to push it back, but failed miserably. The differences between the North and the South were growing with every single minute of debate over slavery, economy and politics. The secession of the states was becoming more and more inevitable over the sixth decade of the 19th century. After the Civil War, the reconstruction of the south began, making new laws, new forms of living.

Though this may be true, secession was not the primary cause because slavery was a problem far before the South ever decided to secede. The United States didn’t want to have to secede from one another but they felt if there were no change with slavery it was bound to happen: “‘ Congress can contribute much to avert [Southern withdrawal from the Union] by proposing and recommending to the legislatures of the several States the remedy for existing evils which the Constitution has itself provided for its own preservation,... an ‘explanatory amendment’ of the Constitution on the subject of slavery...”’ (Buchanan 1860). This shows that they were even talking about adding a new amendment to the constitution strictly for slavery.

If the south would have won key battles the outcome of the war would have changed. Second, the short-term impacts of the civil war would have changed. African-Americans would still be slaves, and Americans lives would have shifted. Also, the long-term impacts of the civil war would have been different. The leadership of the U.S would have changed, and our government system would have changed too.

The economically flourishing South transformed into an economically struggling area, while the North suffered as a result of the collapse of the banks. The Civil War and Reconstruction brought about many economic struggles to the United States and transformed the status of the South. The Civil War indisputably transformed the United States politically, socially, and economically. The 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments sparked most of these changes in addition to the reunification of the Confederate states.

To a greater extent, slavery was the greatest cause of the outbreak of the civil war in 1860. Disputes of slavery caused economic and political troubles between the northern and southern states leading up to the civil war. The fact the the northern and southern states were different in almost every way caused them to turn out like completely different territories, one of their greatest differences was the fact that most southern states economy relied on hard labour, agricultural jobs like tobacco in Maryland, and cotton in Virginia; this caused their economy to be more based on the labour of slaves than the more developed territories in the north (Harrold), who after this time was starting to not need the slave labour in their territories because after early 1800’s, the industrial revolution had been spreading to America, and the country developed very quickly. But in this expansion, only the north states were getting the effect of the industrial revolution, meaning the north would not need slave