Who Is To Blame For The Deaths Of Romeo And Juliet Essay

Although Romeo was peaceful, Tybalt showed no mercy, and eventually Mercutio stepped in and got killed by Tybalt. This causes Romeo to go chase down Tybalt and without thinking about the consequences, shoots and kills Tybalt. If Tybalt would have not been aggressive for no reason, he would still be breathing and Romeo and Juliet would not have to take such drastic measures to try to be

In today's society, some may say that Romeo is to blame for the deaths in the play, or that Juliet is, or that Frair Lawrence is, etc. Above all, Romeo is the most reasonable to blame; however, the other characters are able to be blamed as well. In the first instance, Romeo can be seen as the cause of all the deaths due to his obsession with hooking up with some girl, even if that meant he had to pay. "She will not stay the siege of loving terms, nor bide the encounter of assailing eyes, nor open her lap to the saint seducing gold," Act 1, Scene 1, Lines 198-200.

However, if Tybalt had controlled his temper, and had seen that Romeo was doing no harm to the Capulets, he would have never killed Mercurio, which then would not have caused Romeo to kill him. Romeo was banished as a punishment for his actions against Tybalt. Instead if Tybalt had never attempted to confront Romeo, there would be no need for Prince Escalus to get involved and banish Romeo from Verona. In conclusion, Tybaltś inability to control his aggression towards the Montagues, contributes to the suicides of Romeo and

Tybalt is a fiery, arrogant character, he is always fighting and trying to prove some sort of dominance. He instigated many fights with the Montagues. He first recognizes Romeo at the Capulet’s party and immediately challenges him to a fight. Tybalt’s offensive and intolerant attitude towards Romeo’s presence shows the level of his temperament and the later influence he will have. Driving a deeper wedge between the Capulet and Montague families.

If Tybalt did not cause fights and kill Mercutio, Romeo would not have a reason to kill anyone. Then, Romeo would have not been banned from Verona and sent to

This proves that throughout the book Tybalt will be looking to cause trouble to anyone he gets the chance to fight, even if it's a random Montague servant, to Romeo. At the Capulet's party, Romeo is roaming around bothering no one but Tybalt sees him and says, “Uncle, this is a Montague, our foe, a villain that is hither come in spite to scorn at our solemnity this night. (page 55 act 1, Shakespeare)” Although Romeo isn't bothering anyone in any way Tybalt is aggressive towards him and wants to fight him as he believes Romeo is there to mock him. This proves that Tybalt is overreacting as Romeo isn’t affecting him in any way but wants to attack him as he believes that Romeo is mocking him.

Tybalt (killing Mercutio) would have died even if Romeo didn't kill him because of the Prince's new law. " Not Romeo, Prince, he was Mercutio’s friend. His fault concludes but what the law should end, The life of Tybalt." (2.5.189-191) Romeo's father (Montague), tries to defend him by saying the law would kill Tybalt anyway, making Romeo banished not dead, which does help Romeo, but Romeo runs to the Friar and says he would rather kill himself. In Romeo's mind, all he wanted to do was avenge Mercutio's death

This would cause Romeo to be exiled and if he was ever seen in Verona again he would be captured and killed. After finding out about the murder of Tybalt, Prince Escalus says “And for that offense immediately we do exile him hence.” (Act 3, Scene 1). This quote shows the punishment that was given to Romeo. It would push Romeo and Juliet further apart.

He thinks this will cause Juliet to stop grieving, and that she will be happy. Doing this causes Juliet and Romeo to have to hasten plans and go with a despite route devised by friar Lawrence, which is dysfunctional because Romeo doesn't get clued into the plan that was devised, causing him to commit suicide, and for Juliet to kill herself as well. This shows that by Tybalt fighting with Romeo, Tybalt directly causes the downfall of Romeo and Juliet. The Prince’s sentencing of Romeo to be banished was a fair and appropriate response to Romeo killing Tybalt.

Juliet is also seen conflicted a lot of times during this story between her family and Romeo. This being one major example of that. Tybalt is mainly seen as a villain in Romeo and Juliet because of his rage and hatred towards the Montage family. But with Tybalt, his hatred is really to be blamed on the family feud. If the family feud never existed Tybalt would be a whole different person, but Tybalt was raised knowing the hate the Montague

Tybalt is very protective of his family the capulets. The capulets once threw a party, and Romeo came, leading Tybalt to say “It fits when such a villain is a guest./ I’ll not endure him.” (1,5,75-76) Tybalt said this because he did not want Romeo to be around his family. Tybalt was so protective of his family that Capulet had to tell him not to start anything.

Especially with the Montagues, explicitly speaking, Tybalt’s aggressiveness towards Romeo and his family is sole since they are Montagues, no more or no less. In Act 1, Scene 1, lines 66-67 Tybalt proves his hatred towards the Montagues as he spoke to Benvolio: “As I hate hell, all Montagues, and thee.” Tybalt’s hatred towards the Montagues is pointless because there never was any clear motive for this feud. Tybalt’s hatred accentuates just by catching sight of a Montague. At Lord Capulet’s party, Tybalt hears Romeo’s voice and orders his servant to go get him his sword.

Tybalt was involved in the first conflict that the reader encounters and continues to be problematic throughout the tragedy. He displays a tendency towards violence as soon as the reader becomes introduced to him as he says “What, drawn and talk of peace? I hate the word as I hate hell, all Montagues, and thee.” (1.1. 71-72) Equally important is the argument between Capulet and Tybalt concerning Romeo’s attendance at the party. This spat between the two ending with Tybalt saying “patience perforce with willful choler meeting makes my flesh tremble in their different greeting.

At this point in the play, Romeo had not shown any aggressive emotions like this and remained fairly peaceful. Even after having a calm reputation the anger he feels towards Tybalt grants him the ability to threaten him with death. He shows how anger can completely change a person's actions and behaviors. His impulse to kill Tybalt causes him to be banished, making it harder for him and Juliet to be together. This goes with the belief that teenagerslike him focus more on the outcome rather than the effects of it because Romeo fought in order to honor his friend but didn't think about how it would impact his and Juliet's relationship.

Tybalt refers to Romeo as a villain due to the learned hate between their two families. Through the lenses of a Capulet, anything a Montague does is considered mischievous and vice versa. The hate that these two families share morphs their perspectives. During the fight with Tybalt, Romeo eventually kills him in a rage. When Juliet is informed about the punishment Romeo receives for fighting with Tybalt