What Were The Goals Of The Federalist Papers: Taxation

In 1787 the future of the United States of America remained unclear as the founding fathers attempted to find a form of government to satisfy the nation. At the Constitutional Convention the men gathered formed an idea for a new government. However, not everyone present agreed with the newly proposed constitution and two groups formed, the federalists, who were pro-constitution, and the antifederalists, who opposed the constitution. Because the Constitution needed to be ratified by nine of the thirteen states to become law the two groups wrote essays to defend their stance and persuade the people to join their ideology. Hamilton used a relatable rhetoric with simple language that involved the readers in a personal relationship to persuade them

The federalist papers section one speaks on arguments for the constitution, which spoken on by Alexander Hamilton. He speaks about how the government is too large to a national government. In section two of the papers John Jay talks about how it is good the country stayed united. Also about

The question of why Americans supported or feared the Constitution of 1787 is imperative for it provides further insight into the founding of the United States. The young republic of America had several reasons to strongly support or fear the Constitution of 1787. To many, it would provide stability, but to others, it would take away their individual rights. Those who supported the Constitution (generally the Federalists) felt it was enough—no need for a Bill of Rights. Those who feared the Constitution (generally the Antifederalists) demanded a Bill of Rights to protect citizens.

What Alexander Hamilton describes in the Federalist Papers, is that there were many weaknesses in the development of the government, which needed to be addressed. For example, he stated that, “A feeble executive implies a feeble execution of the government,” Which means that in order to have a strong government, you must have a strong leader. In the Federalist Papers, he is, in all truth, helping the government, by pointing out the flaws within it. This, in return, helped the government, and created a stronger system for it.

1. The Constitution’s ratification process included arguments for and against ratification by Federalists and Anti-Federalists, respectively. Describe and evaluate the arguments expressed by both of these groups. The arguments the Federalists used in support of the ratification of the Constitution include a decrease in strength and authority of the federal government under the currently designated Articles of Confederation (Bardes, Shelly, Schimdt, 2015, pp.

The Federalist No. 10” is a persuasive argument written by James Madison in an attempt to ratify the Constitution. He wrote a series of documents called the Federalist Papers under a pseudonym to convince others to approve of the Constitution. He says that factions are not good for America, neither is a pure democracy. Madison provides extensive arguments and remedies for the problems he is addressing. James Madison is attempting to ratify the Constitution by analyzing the way to deal with factions, comparing a republic to a democracy, and by comparing a small government to a large government.

The Federalist Papers, a term that emerged in the twentieth century, are a collection of 85 essays published from October 1787 through August 1788. They were then compiled and published in two volumes called The Federalist in 1788 by J. and A. McLean. These documents provided support for the ratification of the United States Constitution. They articulated a compelling version of the philosophy and motivation proposed by the new system of government presented by the Constitution. “The Federalist Papers were published and circulated in order to bolster support, educate and advocate for the ratification of the Constitution.”

The debates emerged throughout all the states on whether the new Constitution was an improvement on the Articles of Confederation. Most members of Federalist were the Elites. According to Hamilton in Federalist #30, the first objective of the Constitution was to unify the states into one unified nation to which the federal government would provide an absolute power to support the national forces, civil lists, and currency (Document B). Without these three fundamental factors, the government would lack the capability to control violence and damage caused by factions. The state government had failed to succeed in solving these problems (Document A).

The Federalist party was comprised of Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, James Madison, George Washington, Charles C. Pinckney, DeWitt Clinton and Rufus King the paramount objective set by federalist Members was a fiscally sound and nationalistic government which promoted the system of checks and balances laid out in the US Constitution for the three branches of government. The federalist Party can be perceived as elitist, and its leaders scorned democracy, widespread suffrage, and open elections, however, the acceptance of these notions didn’t escape Ramifications as they lost the support of the general population due to their favoritism of the exclusive class group. The Federalists despite their invalidation etched a lasting legacy in America politics in the form of a strong federal government with a sound financial base and they decisively shaped Supreme Court policy for another three decades through the person of Chief Justice John

Federalists The purpose of the government is to maintain and to organize citizen’s rights and prevent confusion in our country. The articles of confederation were absolutely no good for the united states because the congress had no control over taxation, there was no executive branch and no court system. The constitution should definitely be approved because it would help balance out our government between three branches and bring together our country under one leader. In order to keep our country from falling apart we need balance.

“The Federalist Papers” were a series of 85 articles from 1787-1788. James Madison, James Jay and Alexander Hamilton are the authors and the three of them wrote about how the new government will work and why the idea of a new government would be beneficial to the United States. The authors signed the articles under the name “Publius” in honor of the Roman aristocrat Publius Valerius Publicola because they hoped the he would be credited in the founding of the American Republic. One of the articles’ major topics was idea of having a state constitution and why it is so important for America to have one. “The Anti-Federalist Papers” was also a series of 85 articles.

Following the Revolutionary War, America had just gained independance from Great Britain and needed to form a new government. The Articles of Confederation were established as an attempt to create a government that was unlike Britain’s. Unfortunately, the Articles of Confederation had several weaknesses. When in the process of repairing those weaknesses, the Federalists and the Anti-federalists formed. The Articles of Confederation were very weak as well as useless to America and because of this, the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists could not agree on a new type of government.

Since they were all for the new constitution, they wanted to go ahead and make it. But the Anti-federalists didn’t want this. They were hesitant on this new government. So, that is why the Federalist papers were created. These were a series of 85 essays that tried to convince Anti-Federalists to ratify the Constitution.

Publius provides a convincing case for ratification by thoroughly addressing the Anti-Federalists’ two primary concerns including a potential consolidation of government, and the dangers of hastily ratifying the Constitution The Federal Farmer outlines his concerns with the following statements: “The plan proposed appears to be partly federal, but principally however, calculated ultimately to make the states one consolidated government. The first interesting question, therefore suggested, is, how far the states can be consolidated into one entire government on free principles” (111). This would manifest in blurred lines between the three branches of government.

This document (the Federalist) will provide all the reasons to support the new plan of government described in the U.S. Constitution, and responses to each of the criticisms of the plan. Opponents to the new plan criticize it most on it creating a strong central government that will be abusive to individual liberty. However, an energetic government is crucial to the protection of individual liberty. The plan of government under the Articles of Confederation was unable to effectively protect individual liberties because it did not act directly upon the people, and had no authority to enforce its laws.