Were The Colonists Justified

1. What arguments did the colonist use to oppose the Stamp Act? The colonist were completely enraged when Britain enforced the harsher tax, the Stamp Act. The colonist felt that taxation without consent was a violation of their rights so they started to protest. The way the colonist opposed the Act was by filling the colonial newspapers, pamphlets defending colonial rights, colonial assemblies and even attacking tax collectors and officials.

The British treated the colonists aggressively. Document #1 is about the stamp act. “An act for granting and applying stamp duties...towards further defraying the expenses of defending, protecting and securing.” I know that during 1765, the British made the colonists pay taxes on all printed goods like newspapers and playing cards to pay back the cost of the French and Indian War. It was called the stamp act because they would stamp the good after the colonist payed the tax.

I believe that the nature of the colonists’ opposition to British rule in the year 1763 to 1776 was all the above being political social and economic issues. First and foremost, I would like to begin with the economical aspect of the problem which began with the Stamp Act of 1765, which required all colonist to purchase watermarked, taxed paper which at the time was used in newspapers and all legal documents. The stamp Act of 1764 was the first tax imposed on the colonist by the parliament which lead to great disagreement. Three years later, in 1767 after the repealed of the Stamp Act prior that year parliament passed revenue act better known as the “The Townshend duties “which taxed the most frequent used items in the colonist such as lead, glass, paper and tea, tea being a popular drink at the time, enraged the colonist even more which than lead to the

From 1763 to 1783 American colonist shifted the governing of the colonies from the British monarchy into the hands of the individuals elected by the colonies. Prior to 1763 the British Parliament imposed Navigation Acts following the ideas of Mercantilism, but due to salutary neglect these acts were never truly enforced by the British on the colonies. After the 7 Years War, which ended in 1763, the British finally turned their attention back to the colonies and worked to enforce their taxes and laws upon the colonies which lead to the changes seen in America in the following decades. The American colonist response to the British Parliament’s taxation of the colonies without a representative in Parliament can be seen in documents 1,

The purpose of these acts were, to punish the Americans after the events from the Boston Tea Party. The reason why they punished the Americans was to teach them a lesson after dumping the tea into the water. The Americans called the laws The Intolerable Acts. The so called Acts were, the Boston Port Act, Massachusetts Government Act, Quartering Act, and finally the Quebec Act.

How the colonists responded when faced with difficulty has greatly altered the path of their country. In 1760 a new king , King George III, came into power and brought destruction with jim when he began passing act after outrageous act which sparked a need for rebellion among the colonies. Did the colonists have valid reason to break away from great Britain? The colonists were justified in their actions because the king was a tyrant, they were being forced into silence, and they encountered unprovoked violence. King George III was constantly abusing his power over the colonists and acting irrationally.

Lots of the acts that were passed upset many of the colonists. The Stamp Act was passed in March of 1765. It made people pay for stamps or anything that seals documents and papers. It increased revenue by taxing supplies as in newspapers and much more. Although many people were upset about this passed act, parliament thought it was a fair tax.

To what extent was the American Revolution justified? The American Revolution that had its beginning in early 1775 is defined as severe battle between 13 North American colonies and British government. The ruthless fight initiated by American colonies has many debatable arguments on whether it was justified. Therefore, I’m going to weight both sides in order to answer this question.

After these laws, the 13 colonies started helping each other and began to reunite. The purpose of the Intolerable Acts was to put control over Boston

The colonist started thinking they had no repression in parliament. The commits of correspondence improved commutation among their colonies. In this disagreement with their mother country England, this lead to taxation without repreasation. The British didn’t think that the sugar act wasn’t bringing in enough money for them. Their solution to that problem is creating another act that the colonist has to pay tax on.

This act was made as a way to get payback on the colonists. It also closed the harbor until the tea in the water was paid for in pound sterlings, and it made sure to ban town meetings without asking the governor

This act was directly meant to punish the people of Boston, along with two of the other four acts. These punitive laws would be called the Intolerable Acts by the American Patriots because some of the demands were almost unbearable. Following the act that closed the Boston Harbor, the parliament passed two more acts to secure their jurisdiction over the colonies on May 20, 1774. These acts would limit the freedom of the colony of Massachusetts and increase the power of the royal governor appointed there.

The American Revolution was, to date, the best event to happen on American soil, providing freedom and representation in government to the individuals who fought so hard for it. France and Spain aided our cause, helping this group of brave colonists to defeat the strongest army in the world. But, there is a question still not answered; were the colonists justified in breaking away from Britain? The American colonists were justified in breaking away from the British because there was taxation without representation, they had no freedom, and the British government violated their individual British rights. I believe the American colonists were justified for breaking away from Britain because there was taxation without representation.

The colonists wanted representation when it came down to being taxed, but the British government would not allow it. The government wanted full control over the people, so they made sets of acts and laws that were placed on taxation. For example, the Stamp Acts of 1765. These acts taxed all papers, pamphlets, newspapers, and cards. The Townshend Acts of 1767 were also a large part of taxation.

On the other hand the British deprived the colonists of even the most basic of rights. The American Revolution was more about Civil Liberties because there are three main arguments that support it: Taxation without Representation, the Quartering Act, and the Intolerable (Coercive) Acts. These actions that the British did justified the colonists’ revolution. First of all, one civil liberty that was exempt from the colonists reaches was taxation without representation.