Was Julius Caesar Honorable

The third and final reason for the correct choice by Brutus is that Caesar is unfit and weak to lead Rome. Caesar has many problems that could get in the way of many serious situations. For another example, Caesar has uncontrollable epileptic seizures that affected him during the offering of the crown (Act 1 ,Scene 2 ,Lines 246-254). This could really affect Caesar in the near future with a war or battle.

Through the play Caesar is a liked person and the people of the town wanted him to be crowned king. He is a person who is trusts his friends and that ends up back firing. In William Shakespeare's The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Caesar portrays a tragic flaw, a realization, and moral ambiguity, which makes him the most tragic character. A tragic flaw that Caesar has is that he is very easily manipulated.

Lastly, he just wants what is best for his country. This is why I think Brutus would make a good leader. Cassius wouldn't be suitable for a leader because he is dishonest. A good reason is he is manipulative to Brutus on getting him to switch sides. Another good example is Cassius doesn't have enough power to get what he needs for his plans.

Brutus was right in the fact that killing Caesar would save Rome. The first reason why he was right is it was the only to stop Caesar from becoming dictator. Second, if Caesar were to become dictator, he would end up becoming a tyrant and his ambition would blind him from helping Rome.

HE did this to ensure that Rome stays in a healthy state just like Caesar is going to do. Nobility is passed down the blood line and it is obvious that Brutus receives the trait. Brutus only wants to do whats best for Rome. Brutus kills Caesar for Rome not because of his personal feelings towards him. He

Julius Caesar was seen as a man with great military and political success but he was mainly seen by the people as a strong and respected leader with an immense deal of power. But how did his power still stand after death? In the play “Julius Caesar” written by the famous poet William Shakespeare he tells the story of Caesar's death, including what happened leading up to it and its aftermath. Some parts of the story are fictional but the story itself is historically inspired by some facts. This play shows how Caesar as a person is very different compared to how he is seen in the townspeople’s eyes.

In Julius Caesar, a tragedy was written by William Shakespeare, there are two dominant characters; Caesar and Brutus. Both Caesar, who prided himself in his power and wealth, and Brutus, who developed his pride in his honor, ultimately led to their downfall through their hubris. Caesar’s pride led him to his demise because of his immense pride in his power and wealth, leading him to think of himself as invincible and the most powerful in the world. Which in turn, led to those who were once the advisers and friends of Caesar becoming conspirators.

Brutus assumed that once Caesar is crown ruler, Caesar will reach to top of the social class chain and forget the people who helped him get to where he is. Caesar will begin to make his own decisions and not listen to the people of Rome. Therefore Caesar is the ruler. No one has to tell him what to do. Brutus’s motivation is based on a prediction and observation

Brutus makes decisions, time and time again, that are extremely difficult for him, in order to do what he deems necessary for Rome. He kills Caesar, one of his best friends, because he believes that Rome will not be able to flourish with him as leader. Brutus also decides not to kill Antony, even though it would be easier than leaving him alive. He puts his foot down when Cassius says that he believes they should kill Antony, and says that they are not murderers. So, he does not take the easy way out, he remains honorable.

Julius Caesar was a Shakespearean tragedy of the great Roman dictator and conqueror’s assassination by Marcus Brutus, a Roman noble and senator. In the background for this play, Julius Caesar returns home victorious from his war with Pompey. The Roman senators are becoming worried that he will crown himself king and take away their power, the power of the republic. In the beginning of Julius Caesar, Cassius, one of the senators, wants Brutus to join their cause of stopping Julius Caesar from becoming a totalitarian, or an absolute dictator. These senators are corrupt.

The Tragedy of Julius Caesar written by William Shakespeare is not only about the death of Julius Caesar, but the aftermath and inner struggles of the men who killed him. Whenever Julius Caesar assumes power after the war with Pompey, he wants to become king. This upsets most of the noblemen living in Rome since they could be living like slaves under Caesar until they die. Caius Cassius is the head of the conspirators who got the great Marcus Brutus to join him. The journey of the tragic hero Brutus begins and ends with his internal struggles.

I feel like he didn’t take their opinion into consideration if the people wanted or needed anything. He has strong support for them but does not want them to lose their power. Brutus can be careless sometimes too. He doesn’t care about what anyone else does. The actual reason he killed himself is that he believed that it was he who had to protect Rome, but now he feels he has ruined Rome.

Everyone knows that Julius Caesar was stabbed to death by his friends, so they naturally assume Caesar is a tragic hero. In digging deeper, the real tragic hero of The Tragedy of Julius Caesar is revealed. To begin, William Shakespeare’s play is based on historical events that occurred in Rome around 44 B.C. Julius Caesar was born in 102 B.C. and died in 44 B.C. During this time, he became a power-hungry military leader. His rise to power was a result of such actions that made the Roman public love him.

In summary, the relevance of Julius Caesar lies in its timeless themes and its ability to provoke important questions about power, loyalty, morality, and also character. By engaging with these themes, the play challenges us to think critically about our own society and the nature of political power, making it an important work on how our leaders are now characterized. Our character will determine the outcome of how we are seen, judged, and criticized. Will there still be an Antony in our society to stand up for the people and rival/or bring into light people like a deceiving

Julius Caesar, friend and foe, yet same beginning. In this tale Shakespeare writes about friend and foe and what is best for Rome. The two main characters in this tale are Caesar and Brutus. Both have known each other for a time now and yet they fight for who should be king or “God” of Rome as the people of the country say. The story continues as both Brutus and Caesar want power.