We all have the right to back out of situations even if it could be life or death. Guy montag is justified in burning his and Mildred's house. Montag had been caught breaking the law by owning books, he made the mistake of reading the books to Millies friends and also was not forced to burn down the house. He had control of what he wanted to do and made the mistake of doing all these actions. Of course some people get away with breaking the law, but Montag should not. It wasn’t just the fact he owned books but he stole them from his job worksites. Yes, on the job every fireman gets an itch to take a book home and after 24 hours, burn it. But have own multiple books to the count of 21 books shows he surpassed the law by a lot. “Then he reached …show more content…
Just like why Montag made the mistake of reading a page of a book to Millies friends. The women he read to are drained by society as well as Millie, but understand the dangers of books. “Then he begin to read in a low stumbling voice that grew firmer as he progressed from line to line, and his voice went out across the desert, into the whiteness, and around the three sitting woman there in the great hot emptiness.” Page 96 Paragraph 3. This event was the last straw of Montag's decisions. This led to the reason why he had been driven by Beatty to his own house. It wasn’t just because of the fact Millies friends called him in but his own wife did it out of protection. The plan Montag tried to make happen had backfired and ruined his life. He made the women cry and Millie leave him, that wasn’t part of his plan at …show more content…
Do to his actions he tried to relieve them by taking it out on property that they would call our safe place, there home. This can relate to such a strong topic us Americans don’t even like to mention, 9/11. It represents our strong point of view why we think montag is guilty. If you either was there at the event, learned about it, or watched it at home, it was one of our weakest times in America. It destroyed lives but the Group Al Qaeda (the people who did the attack) had a choice, to love their country and keep them out of world affairs or just kill a bunch of innocent American citizens. Montag had the choice of his community or himself, Selfishly he chose himself over ones he apparently
Social justice is often strived for by society. It is a necessary force in allowing humankind to coexist. However, the individual also has to play a role in maintaining social justice. The role of the individual is stated in the texts Fahrenheit 451 and “The Pedestrian” by Ray Bradbury and “Letter From Birmingham Jail” by Martin Luther King Jr. by illustrating the consequences of not participating in the monitoring of justice.
In this part of the book, all of the firemen including Montag received a call to burn a house with the books in there. Here became the turning point for Montag as he saw the woman, who already had made her decision to die rather than live in a world of oppression and restricted freedom of thought which books symbolize in this part, burns with the illegal books in the burning house, refusing to go out without the assurance of the safety of the books. We can suppose that his perception is gradually changing through the phrase showing that Montag felt a huge guilt over this, unlike the other firemen or Beatty. Furthermore, during the conversation with his wife, Mildred, Montag says, “We burn a thousand books. We burnt a woman.
Then Montag went and did the worst thing possible, he read a poem to Mildred’s friends, Mrs. Phelps and Mrs. Bowles. After he read the poem, he fled the house and went to turn in a book to Beatty. What he didn’t know is that the ladies have turn in an alarm and Mildred did too. The firemen, Montag, and Beatty made their way to Montag’s house. Beatty reveals that he knew all along that Montag was lying and made Montag burn down his own house.
Argumentative Essay Isaiah LaTurner Killing people isn’t good, but people fight wars and kill people to sustain a way of life, continue to survive and protect their family. In the book Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury, there is a future where people are dragged down by technology and are like mindless sheep shuffling through life. This is sustained by censorship and limiting people 's knowledge, the government burns books and censors what people see on TV or listen to through their seashells, they use firemen to do this and censor everything.
Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, Montag has been brought before the court to be discussed on whether he is innocent or guilty and should be punished for crimes against society. Montag has been wrongly accused of crimes that are harmful to society. These ‘crimes’ have not affected the society as a whole but mainly himself and his mind. To be brutally honest, this society would not care much at all for the fact that Montag had books or murdered someone, for this happens many times in this society and has not been disciplined or recognized as a felonious and a punishable crime. Montag is innocent and should not be punished for crimes that only affected him.
Anyone could say that if Montag had conformed he would have stayed on the side of “good;” however, there is no true “good” side there is uniqueness and being individuality which is considered to be “good” to most people in the society in which people live. Conformity and individuality in this book were hard to see due to the fact that Montag’s society wanted everything to be perfect in a world that was not. One should always be themselves even if society tells them to be something different. Be a unique individual not something, or someone, someone else wants you to
“The bravest of individuals is one who obeys his or her conscience.” - J.F. Clark. This suggests, that someone who listens to their conscience, is considered to be a brave individual. In terms of agreeing, or disagreeing with this critical lens, I agree, because it often takes a great deal of courage to do what you truly believe is correct.
When Montag reveals his hidden books to Mildred, she does not take time to understand them. “‘It doesn’t mean anything!’” (Bradbury 65). She, instead, worries about how it might affect her image if they are found out. “He could hear her breathing rapidly and her face paled out and her eyes were fastened wide” (Bradbury 63).
Suddenly things he did every day without hesitation seemed silly. This is when the reader finally is able to identify the theme. For a while, it seems as though it is Montag against the world. The only person who could possibly understand him, Clarisse ,was murdered. His Family isn't an option and his wife Mildred was a lost cause.
Montag rebels against his society because of the lack of actual people. (STEWE-1) Montag’s last encounter with Beatty is what made him act out. “Montag only said, We never burned right… Hand it over, Guy, said Beatty with a fixed smile.
He is justified because when Beatty comes to the house to check on Montag he gives him a speech about how all fireman get eager and take a book to see what is so good about it. He is also justified from hiding it from Mildred because if she would have taken the book out from behind the pillow when Beatty was there because she would know longer have her “family” her house, and her and Montag’s belongings. “Let me fix your pillow,” said Mildred “No!” whispered Montag... Mildred’s hand had froze behind the pillow.”
(STEWE-2) Besides asking questions about society’s relationships, Montag questions further and starts asking about society’s rules on burning books after he experiences a woman burn with her books. He says to Mildred, “'There must be something in books, things we can't imagine, to make a woman stay in a burning house; there must be something there.'" (Bradbury 48). Montag, before, had blindly followed and enforced society’s rules about burning books.
Montag is a puppet in the dystopian society following the protocol and his inability to reason with what he is doing makes him gullible and dangerous within this
Ray Bradbury 's novel Fahrenheit 451 delineates a society where books and quality information are censored while useless media is consumed daily by the citizens. Through the use of the character Mildred as a foil to contrast the distinct coming of age journey of the protagonist Guy Montag, Bradbury highlights the dangers of ignorance in a totalitarian society as well as the importance of critical thinking. From the beginning of the story, the author automatically epitomizes Mildred as a direct embodiment of the rest of the society: she overdoses, consumes a vast amount of mindless television, and is oblivious to the despotic and manipulative government. Bradbury utilizes Mildred as a symbol of ignorance to emphasize how a population will be devoid of the ability to think critically while living in a totalitarian society. Before Montag meets Clarisse, he is
Fahrenheit 451 Essay Courage enables an individual to stand up for what they believe in order to make a change. In Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451, Montag’s courage enables him to envision a different future and take action to achieve it. Initially, Montag does not question the world around him; however, he becomes aware of the limitations of his society in his search for happiness.