1. 2. INTERNATIONAL TRADE THEORIES 2.1. Absolute Advantage According to Adam Smith 1776) in….., a country has an absolute advantage in the production of a product when it is more efficient than any other country in producing it. If two countries specialize in production of different products (in which each has an absolute advantage) and trade with each other, both countries will have more of both products available to them for consumption. 2.2. Neoclassical Trade theory This is also known as Comparative Advantage. (David Ricardo1817) stated that even if one country has an absolute advantage in producing two products over another country, trading with that other country will still yield more output for both countries than if the more efficient …show more content…
Heckscher-Ohlin Theory Comparative advantage ascends from differences in national factor endowments, such as land, labour, or capital, as opposite to Ricardo’s theory which stresses productivity. This theory suggest that the country should focus on exporting products using its scarce resources and brings across a free trade principle where goods will be moving freely without any trade barriers implying that this would make flow of resources in and out more demand and more supply will increase the country’s economy(Eli Heckscher 1919 &Bertil …show more content…
Based on four attributes, first one is Factor endowments that focus on basic factors natural resources, climate, location, demographics second one is advanced factors such as communication infrastructure, sophisticated and skilled labour, research facilities, and technological know-how. Third one will be advanced factors are a product of investment by individuals, companies, and governments. Porter argues that advanced factors are the most significant for competitive advantage. Lastly demand conditions that look at customer need or the demand on which is being produced, companies will have to produce innovative, high quality products early, which lead to competitive advantage. Relating and supporting industries, if suppliers or related industries exist in the home countries that are themselves internationally competitive, this can result in competitive advantage in the new industry, firm strategy, structure, and rivalry. Different nations are characterized by different management ideologies, which can either help or hurt them in building competitive advantage. If there is a strong domestic rivalry, it helps to create improved efficiency, making those firms better international competitors. Porter also notes that chance (such as new breakthrough innovations) and government policies (such as regulation, investments in education, etc.) can influence
For example, if I was able to make 50 units of cloths in one day and whomever I am trading with is only able to make 20 units of cloths, I would have a comparative advantage in cloths. Now if I also had a comparative advantage in making food, this would mean I would have an absolute advantage over everything.
In the 1500’s the world was run on an Independent world, which meant that all countries were depending on their selves. Throughout the early to late 1500’s countries were trading with each other for goods either with money or other goods that other countries were unable to produce themselves. There were trade circles all over the world that trade runners would travel to unload their cargo and stock up products they receive from trade. These countries were trading materials such as gold, sugar, tobacco, and metals, and other raw materials that were valuable. By the 1700 the world was turning more interdependent.
For any country that wants to survive in the toughest of times, they need to have good trading capabilities. Very few countries are able to sustain themselves without indulging in intensive trade with other countries. Trading has been considered a good thing in the past, but with the changing world, there are doubts about the benefits of trading. There are some factors that lead to the development of trade networks between countries. When people started to settle in larger towns, the idea that you had to produce absolutely everything for survival, began to fade.
Benjamin Franklin said, “No nation was ever ruined by trade.” During the early modern era, technological advancements in shipbuilding and increased knowledge on wind and current patterns made global trading possible. The increased flow of trade in the 1300s through 1800s created important social relations and economic opportunities due to the increased integration of foreign people and desire to be wealthiest and most powerful, while improving government, culture, and ideas in the modern world. Global trading increased the spread of people, which also increased the spread of religion and culture.
The triangular trade was made between three continents: North America, Europe, and Africa. The colonists from North America bartered using their national resources and gave them to the Europeans. The Europeans benefited by using the natural resources and produced manufactured goods. Then, Europeans bartered their manufactured goods to Africa. Africa benefited by gaining manufactured goods to use for their daily lives.
David Ricardo’s work “On The Principles of Political Economy and Taxation” written in 1817 is the example of classical writings about economics. The point Ricardo makes in Chapter 7 “On Foreign Trade” is generally that trade is beneficial and a basis for trade is comparative advantage (1817). The essay states that comparative advantage can be a reason for international trade; however there are still problems with its implication in practice. To prove that this paper will first explain Ricardo’s comparative advantage theory. Second, it will provide an example of Kazakhstan and Russia for more explanation.
The term “Washington Consensus” was created in 1989. It was first used in a background paper for a conference to examine the extent to which the old ideas of development economics (Williamson 2010). In order to ensure that it addresses the common set of issues, John Williamson made a list of ten policies that he thought the majority in Washington would agree were needed and labelled it the “Washington Consensus.” Williamson thinks that it would be a good policy to help the debtor countries overcome their debt burden with the changes in economic policy. 1.2
And also, as a result of international trade, the market contains greater competition with more competitive price and cheaper products. This essay will focus on the definition, advantages and consequences of international trade with considerable theories and evidence. First point I want to emphasize is that international trade is the exchange of goods and services between countries. This is the type of world economy and trade, prices, supply and demand, impact which influences world events. Political change in Asia is inclined to lead to increase labor costs, thus increase the production costs of sneaker companies.
Each of the forces is determined how competitive in that industry as well as the structure of the industry. Porter’s five forces factors are consists of competitive rivalry, the threat of new entrants, the threat of substitutes, bargaining power from
Technological factors have become one of the most important factors in doing business. Change in technology in a country will define how to do business in that country. As a result a company may have to change their operating strategy to do business. Australia is one of the most advanced countries in the world. Australia is a net energy exporter and fourth highest coal producer in the world.
To do this it needs to have a competitive advantage over its its rivals. A competitive advantage is something a company does better than its rivals that gives it an advantage over its rival. Porter (1988) states that a firm performs many activities that can contribute to a firms relative cost position and create a basis for differentiation which can create a cost advantage that gives a firm a competitive advantage over its competitors. A company’s competitive advantage and competitive strategy are both interrelated. Competitive strategy is defined by Porter (1980) as a broad formula for how a business is going to compete, what its goals should be, and what policies will be needed to carry out those goals.
Threat of Substitutes 4. Bargaining Power of Buyers 5. Power vested by Suppliers 1. Competitive Rivalry: According to Porter the competitiveness in any sector is significantly increased by the number of players operating in the field and their major competencies.
There are six factors that make countries more competitive: (Porter, 1990) • National competitiveness – It refers to intensity of competitiveness with the rival countries and the area of competition, for instance governmental support, relationship with customers, etc. • Type of domestic demand – Domestic demand refers to its type of structure and level of sophistication and the availability to transfer to other competitors (countries). • Factor advantages – The advantages that a country has over competitors in raw materials, climate, education, infrastructure, telecommunication, educated workforce and research
The four building blocks of competitive advantage can be used to help a company become more profitable and stay ahead of their competition. The four factors are superior efficiency, quality, innovation, customer responsiveness. All four building blocks are important to any company. However, I believe that customer responsiveness is the most important because having loyal and happy customers can make or break any company. The four building blocks can help companies grow and become the leader in their industry over their rivals.
Secondly, Porter’s Five Forces Model is used to analyse the level of rivalry in the market, the attractiveness for potential new entrants, the power of suppliers, the power of buyers and the threat of substitution. This will allow us to see a holistic view of the industry in the market environment. Thirdly, the PESTLE framework is used to analyse the factors within the macro environment that are influencing