To What Extent Was The Sugar Interest To Blame For The Revolutionary War

614 Words3 Pages

Sugar Interest The Sugar Interest could be blamed for the Revolutionary War because their initial decision to give the French back their Caribbean colony resulted in a chain of events that caused the colonists to rebel against Britain. The British gave back France’s Caribbean colonies to lower the amount of sugar being produced, therefore having the opportunity to increase the price in the colonies. Britain also began enforcing the Sugar Act, which placed an importation tax on Non-British Sugar and Non-British Rum. As the British Parliament continued placing new taxes on the American Colonies, the colonists began revolting against the crown. The Sugar Interest did not want Britain to keep the French Sugar Islands because it would lower the profit gained by the British sugar planters. If they had a greater supply of sugar in the market, the demand and profit would decrease. They wanted to keep the amount of sugar in the British market low to increase demand, ensuing the escalation in sugar prices. To keep the profit high, the British Parliament gave France back their colonies in the Caribbean and only kept Quebec. In return, the French gave Britain the eastern part of Louisiana as a part of the Treaty of 1763, which ended the French and Indian War. …show more content…

The Sugar Act put a tax on sugar and rum imported from other countries besides Britain. While many colonists did not have an issue with the Sugar Act, the colonists in Boston did. Boston drank a lot of rum, which meant they wanted to buy the cheapest, but still enjoyable, rum they could. Britain did not want the colonies to drink French rum because they did not want the French to make profit from the colonies. When the British began enforcing the tax on rum, a small percentage of colonists in Boston were angry due to the lack of representation in

Open Document