Abstract: There are unequal privileges shared by men and women in the United States workforce. Throughout history human civilization have seen a revolution in the role of women up until modern society, where it is perceived as equal. However, although it might be invisible, an inequality gap still exists and acts as a glass ceiling for women.
This research paper will be focusing primarily on the sociological and psychological factors that contribute to this difference in privilege. Different forms of research were conducted in order to thoroughly present credible results in support of the proposed hypothesis; these research materials will include quantitative and qualitative resources with extensive secondary data analysis.
Hypothesis:
…show more content…
An interesting research paper produced by sociologists Torres and Matt Hoffman from the University of California Irvine blames the presence of the glass ceiling on networking capabilities, rather than gender. According to the Hoffman’s males and females generally network with each other; the scientific name for this phenomenon is called Homophily. The age old phrase “birds of a feather flock together” can best be used to describe the situation. The study also includes the fact that women recognize this phenomenon and try harder than their male counterparts to overcome it (again re-affirming the recognition and existence of the glass ceiling). According to the theory of social networking, since men have the majority share of holding senior management positions, it is easier for men to advance and get promoted throughout their careers. The study concludes with a strategy to overcome the gender bias, if women were to increase their influence over the male dominated social networks, then they themselves must aim for higher positions as well as adding more high status males into their professional networks. This in turn would definitely decrease the glass ceiling …show more content…
Although modern day industry workforces seem to depict otherwise, women do not share the same privileges as men do in the United States workforce and indeed encounter a glass ceiling where their potential is limited. The glass ceiling is not only recognized but is also anticipated, indicating the degree to which it exists in modern times. In my opinion, the deficit in privilege is not only limited to professional occupations but can also be generalized into other factors such as judiciary and political where gender can be used as a differentiation tool (along with race and
As modern society has made clear, women have the ability to perform with equal skill and success in virtually every endeavor engaged in by men, including employment, athletics, academics and politics. Yet discrimination on the basis of sex has a long history in the United States, and its residual effects still operate to keep women's salaries lower and opportunities fewer in the employment
The term "glass ceiling" is generally used to refer to instances where women and minorities have progressed within an organization, but despite their ambitions and qualifications, find it difficult to make the movement into key higher level management positions, or management positions at all. The social disadvantage these glass ceilings is the inability of the most qualified employees to move into the most important positions due to irrelevant criteria such as race or gender (U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 2006). Mentoring. A process whereby knowledgeable individuals counsel, guide, and assist individuals of lessor experience and or proficiency (Dunbar & Kinnersley,
This then introduces the concept of the glass ceiling ( Gay Bryant, Adweek,1984) which deals with the concept that there is an invisible boundary preventing woman from working up the career ladder. Woman too
In the U.S., intersectionality is highly prevalent. For example, men with children have better chances of getting a job and receiving a larger compensation than women with children (Steinem 2014). The notion that men get paid more than women should not be new to anyone, and the idea that women with children are somehow less qualified than men with children is astonishing. This mindset may also support the glass ceiling issue that some women still face. Equal pay continues to be an ever-challenging uphill battle for women in the U.S. today.
In “Networking Isn’t Always Easy. But It Is Crucial” Liz Rappaport discusses how networking in business plays a key role in career advancement, especially for women, but is often much harder for them to do than for their male colleagues. Rappaport describes why women need to make a habit of building strong business relationships, maintaining them with regular following-up through social events and networking functions. These business relationships serve several important functions: gaining a forum to seek professional advice based on experience, garnering solid industry connections that provide later career advancement opportunities, and maintaining an expansive, robust business environment that promotes personal growth and development.
In 1986, The Wall Street Journal published an article called “The Glass Ceiling”, which introduced the concept of the Glass Ceiling. The Glass Ceiling has significant message it is conveying, which is the difficulty for women to move up in the industry or workplace hierarchy, due to their sex. I wanted to put this study together because I believe it is very important for the public to put more attention to this, so women can be able to break the glass. Industries and women have been going head to head trying to break this, but it has been going on for so long we believe this glass ceiling has already turned into plastic. When being introduced this idea I wanted to base my paper on researching how these glass ceiling affected women over time
Gender Stratification in The Workplace Over the years, women have fought their way through the various barriers thrown at them by society, they are now more educated, matching male participation rates in the labour force and they are seen to create more opportunities for themselves in the workplace. Despite these achievements, gender stratification still exists in organizations and corporations in the 21st century; this paper seeks to analyze the numerous reasons why women remain underrepresented in leadership positions in the workplace and how this causes a trickle-down effect for other females in non-managerial positions. One of the major factors influencing the progress women experience in their career advancement stems from the deep cultural-infused gender stereotypes associated
Gender equality: the pinnacle concept that American society is not-so desperately trying to achieve. Many Americans have convinced themselves that gender equality was remedied by the Nineteenth Amendment and the Second Feminist Movement, and have not considered the thousands of steps that are left on the journey. In recent years, a matter of public interest has been the gender wage gap, stating that women are earning significantly less money than men for doing an equivalent amount of work. Critics of the effort to “break the glass ceiling” claim that a pay gap does not exist, and that if it does, it is because women either do not work as hard, have to tend to their families, or hold lower paying jobs. However, the gender pay gap has been proven to exist in a variety of different forms,
Another aspect that causes women to experience some difficulties climbing the hierarchical ladder is the lack of mentors. This issue is closely related to the informal networks described in the previous section. Given that old-boy networks play an active role in mentoring men and supporting them throughout their career, women have had less mentoring opportunities than their male colleagues (Jakobsh, 2004). Wirth (2001) provides us with a precise definition of mentoring: “Mentoring involves the pairing of younger potential managers (sometimes referred to as “high flyers” or “fast trackers”) with older, experienced and more senior managers who provide coaching, support, advice and visibility.”
Here, Kolhatkar tells of a young woman working in a corporate company looking to climb up the ladder of the business. However, we find that she doesn't receive the same employment and promotional opportunities as many of her male peers, many of whom, she appears to be superior to. She argues this viewpoint once again, when she says, “One former Tesla employee told me that women made up less than ten percent of her working group; at one point, there were actually more men named Matt in the group than there were women” (Kolhatkar). In this quoted text we can infer that women are not given as many opportunities as men within the workplace. Kolhatkar further argues that this could be because when women do attempt to achieve these positions they are often not taken seriously.
Specific Purpose: After listening to my speech, the audience will be able to understand the history of the Glass ceiling, what the Glass Ceiling is, how the Glass Ceiling’s existence is ignored by some, and the ideas there are for cracking the Glass Ceiling. Thesis: Women have encountered barriers that block them from climbing the corporate ladder since the beginning of time, and some Americans ignore this ceiling while others come up with ideas to shatter it. INTRODUCTION: I. Attention Getter:
Both Condoleezza Rice and Hillary Clinton [obviously we all know these are females] rose to the highest office in the US State Department. Secondly, Hillary Clinton has recently risen to become the presumptive Democratic nominee for the US presidency. The head of the US Department of Justice is Loretta Lynch [also a female]. These US political observations suggest that the glass ceiling no longer exists in the US, at least for government occupations. However, we should look beyond just one society.
The working status of women has fluctuated greatly in America’s history, with jobs being denied to and kept from them. At this point, women have mostly secured their place in the job market, but there are other obstacles that remain; for example, the wage gap still persists, and while women can work alongside men, they are still seen as being inferior to them. Due to these negative factors, working women are not only expected to happily work alongside men - they are expected to work harder than them to prove their place. This higher expectation has lead to negative effects in women’s history, socioeconomic relations, and their health.
Over the past 40 years defenders of women’s right have worked hard to assure growth of women's careers, trying to contest what is attribute as ‘the glass ceiling’ which is the invisible barriers that control woman from rising to top positions in corporate context. From the mid-90s European Government firms and private and public organizations have pursued a suit, bringing the recruitment of women at the upper levels of companies. The increasing prominence of leaders like Carly Fiorina, Hillary Clinton, and Condoleezza Rice accentuate the development in gender roles over the last half century. In the first paragraph I will discuss what do you need to be a successful leader and also about how women rises in organizational structures and practices,
The United States is currently facing an economical problem that involves males and female differences within the workplace. Males are given bigger and sometimes even better rewards for doing equal amounts of work as their female counterparts. Females are frequently not receiving the same wage even if they can complete the same job of a male. Also, females are less likely to get promoted within their job if they are competing against a male. A source states, “Women are now more likely to have college degrees than men, yet they still face a pay gap in every single education level,