Summary The article “The Unbearable Conundrum of AI Consciousness” by Cami Rosso revolves around one important question: “Will machines one day become self-aware?.” Multiple comparisons between human and artificial intelligence were introduced along the way. The topics presented in the article varied from describing a robot’s capabilities to early human development. The article also introduces psychologist-Gordon Gallup Jr. who is most well known for creating the recognition test. He performed trial and error tests with mammals using a mirror. The main idea behind the tests was to observe if the animals could recognize their body and movements within the reflection. Thus, proving that animals are self-aware. In addition, the article also presented …show more content…
The article “The Unbearable Conundrum of AI Consciousness” introduces this fact all while comparing with human brains and their development of self-awareness throughout childhood. It’s a debate whether inanimate objects such as a robot’s brain can be considered self-aware as well. A computed brain could be programmed to an extent where it can perform human movements with similar or even greater precision. Despite this, robots are unable to mirror their own movements. They are only programmed to mimic certain actions by their creator. Thus, rooting to the question, “Will machines one day become self-aware?.” In my opinion, I believe that machines will become self-aware someday. Everything is a learning process. Machines learn just as much as we do. The article didn’t offer much information. From my point of view it seemed like it was more questions than answers. Fortunately, I had some prior knowledge of AI’s. For example, Sophia the Robot. According to Hanson Robotics, Sophia is their most unique and advanced robot to date. One of her achievements include: “World’s first United Nation Innovation Champion by United Nations Development Program (UNDP)” (“Sophia,” n.d., para 2). This shows that the world recognizes her abilities to cooperate among humans. She’s still in development, so I don’t have any doubts that by the time it’s the year 2040 that she will become fully self-aware and many more like her will be
However, Carr did not inform the readers his credentials and professional expertise throughout the essay. His profession is established at the end of the essay on a small footnote, which also provided his other essays and books. In the beginning of his essay, he establishes himself as a trustworthy source by discussing catastrophic events and providing small amounts of history. He also used quotes from historical figures such as the British mathematician and philosopher Alfred North Whitehead to make readers assume that he researched for his topic, which he did (90). Carr also provided opposing viewpoints by giving the reader’s quotes from theorists who are pro-automation and facts that prove humans can be “unreliable and inefficient” when they are responsible for operating simple tasks (93).
Will we continue to let our own intelligence be flattened by the artificial intelligence we surround ourselves
For example, he states that " philosophers and behaviorists have long argued that animals are not capable of self-awareness because they lack individualism" (Rifkin 10). To rebut, Rifkin continues by providing new research that reveal that animals are indeed capable of self-awareness and individualism; referencing orangutans who were given mirrors to explore their body parts at the Washington National Zoo, as well as Chantek at the Atlanta Zoo, who is capable of using his reflection to groom his teeth and adjust his glasses (10). By pointing out the weakness in the proposed objections towards his claim, Rifkin is able to gain credibility with the audience by showing that he is not biased on just one side of the argument, but rather knowledgeable on the subject in its
Leonel Ramos Mrs.Harrell ENG 112 May 3, 2023 Final Exam Essay The articles “'Rise of the Machines' is Not a Likely Future” by Micheal Littman and the article “Is Google Making Us Stupid” by Nicholas Carr discuss the topics of the impact of technology. The articles discuss the same topic in a unique way but sway in view points. For example in the article “Rise of the Machines' is Not a Likely Future” Littman suggest that technology is not here to over take us and going to take over he suggest that AI is still in the work and has room to improve but we should use it to improve society.
When we improve and evolve, when do we cease to be human? We have all the gadgets sci-fi movies from less than 50 years ago portrayed: video chat, drones, voice activation, virtual reality, and more. We are already currently creating the next miracle and great fear: self-learning robots. They will challenge our long-held confidence as the intellectual king as the offspring may surpass the parent. This program will allow me to work with those selected as some of the most advanced in their fields of science and technology, combining both factual evidence and differing analyzed perspectives to answer these questions on human identity.
Supporters of computationalism and strong artificial intelligence claim that computers are capable of intelligence and other cognitive states if they are programed correctly. Therefore, computers can explain how human cognition performs. I contend that John Searle is correct in his claim that computers are incapable of understanding language and are, therefore, unable to explain human cognition. I begin the essay with Searle’s Chinese room argument, and explain how he uses it to prove that computers cannot understand language as they operate on syntax alone, where syntax is insufficient in producing understanding. Thereafter, I provide a description of the robot reply to the Chinese room argument, which states that a robot with a computer insert and sensory apparatus would be able to achieve understanding, a view which Searle argues is still insufficient.
As far as we know, we could unknowingly be moving ourselves to technology that can start to think for itself. such as the co-captain from wall-e.
And with this we are also creating more intelligent machines. Some time ago an essay was published by (Ray Kurzweil) called “The Coming Merging of Mind and Machine” this article goes over a lot of evolutionary advances our machines have come too and will come to in the future of human existence. There is a quote that states “as this happens, there will be no longer be a clear distinction between humans and machines” (Kuzweil). He is saying that in the near future we will have created such advanced technology that people will not be able to tell the difference between human and machines. This means that a computer system or robot will have every this a human has, thoughts, free speech, and perhaps conscience.
Based upon the analysis, Parnas’ article is geared more towards people involved in the field of Artificial Intelligence where Eldridge’s article is geared towards people who are not necessarily knowledgeable about Artificial Intelligence yet are interested to learn more about the topic. Throughout the article, Parnas maintains the skeptical attitude towards Artificial Intelligence, literally ending with “Devices that use heuristics to create the illusion of Intelligence present a risk we should not accept” (Parnas, 6). Eldridge on the other hand, maintains a positive attitude throughout the article despite the shortcomings of AI. Together, both authors provide compelling arguments for and against Artificial
Carlie Zeisler Mrs. Stetson Current Event Essay Nadine and Other Forms of Artificial Intelligence “All of this seems like science fiction... DuLight and the Google chatbot may be experiments, but Facebook’s facial recognition, Microsoft’s Skype translation, and Google’s Android voice recognition are very real-and available to us all.” (Metz) What is artificial intelligence (A.I.)? A.I. is technology that can process most information and display some form of intelligence. Your phone, tablet, computer, or even a robot?
The critique of the work arises from the original book not making a strong case for convincing the readers thinking further into the ethical dilemmas. The review mentions examples of a broader perspective of the ethical issues that may arise if robots become conscious beings. Seeing that this article analyzes the shortcomings of a previous work in defining the behavior and issues of autonomous robots, and suggests new perspectives, it strives to further the ideas of creating specific codes of conduct for these machines. This is tied to my topic due to the overall goal of the work, in debating and trying to find how much autonomy should be given to a robot.
Can Artificial Intelligence Become Essentially Human and What Constitutes Humanity? Reflective Piece after reading Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? In speculative fiction, artificial intelligence is a common theme, and these entities experience very different realities, from Bender’s complete freedom in Futurama to the robots in Isaac Asimov’s Robot series, who are under human control. But as our society moves closer to achieving true, conscious artificial intelligence, we need to ask ourselves some tough questions in preparation for our future living with conscious, manmade entities.
If this feels wrong to you, this is because it should. Robots are affecting our consciousness in ways some overlook; as a society, we are not becoming additionally adaptable or wiser. We are becoming fish in a fish
Universal Declaration of Human Rights states that,” all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights (UDHR). Meanwhile, the concept of human beings has been extended to non-human beings, such as animals, and to non-human entities, such as corporations, publications, and businesses (Lacy). Moreover, as of last year, Sophia-a humanoid robot built to simulate human conversation-had been granted citizenship by Saudi Arabia (Wootson). Despite their impressive capabilities, I don’t think that AI should be granted same rights as humans because at this moment A.I. has not reached self-awareness and it could be used to stop governments being responsible for their actions. At present time, A.I. has not reached self-awareness.
Rise of Artificial Intelligence and Ethics: Literature Review The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence, authored by Nick Bostrom and Eliezer Yudkowsky, as a draft for the Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence, introduces five (5) topics of discussion in the realm of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and ethics, including, short term AI ethical issues, AI safety challenges, moral status of AI, how to conduct ethical assessment of AI, and super-intelligent Artificial Intelligence issues or, what happens when AI becomes much more intelligent than humans, but without ethical constraints? This topic of ethics and morality within AI is of particular interest for me as I will be working with machine learning, mathematical modeling, and computer simulations for my upcoming summer internship at the Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC) in Norco, California. After I complete my Master Degree in 2020 at Northeastern University, I will become a full time research engineer working at this navy laboratory. At the suggestion of my NSWC mentor, I have opted to concentrate my master’s degree in Computer Vision, Machine Learning, and Algorithm Development, technologies which are all strongly associated with AI. Nick Bostrom, one of the authors on this article, is Professor in the Faculty of Philosophy at Oxford University and the Director at the Future of Humanity Institute within the Oxford Martin School.