The Trial of Captain Preston: Key Evidence Documentation
Introduction
The primary source that was used was a complied list of the personal accounts and eyewitness accounts.It was put together by Becker and Wheeler from the book called “The American Past” (1990). Why did the group of people gather outside? They gathered because of the absurd amounts of taxes that were brought about by the British parliament. Why were the taxes brought to just the colonies rather than people in England? The taxes were made because the British thought that If they have to fight a war for their people, they should have to pay for the soldiers. No information has been given on why they have the colonies and not the rest of the world pay. Why was the crowd outside
…show more content…
was the person that was responsible for giving the command to open fire in the famous, Boston Massacre. The massacre took place outside the old Massachusetts state house. It was an event that would change Boston forever. The incident was on March 5th, 1770. There was something important related to the wave of British parliamentary taxes. A small crowd formed outside the state house. The guards outside the house were telling them to leave. The crowd kept growing, and growing. Eventually there were hundreds of angry protesting people outside the state house. There was screaming and shouting and furious words being exchanged. Then a couple people got overly rowdy and got struck by the guns.The guards started to back up towards the building as the crowd went insane. There are multiple stories on this incident. Some people say the British just fired away, some people say that the people started throwing things at the guards. Some people said that the shots were justified and some say the shots were not. For one thing, the guards should have been disciplined more during training. Going by a majority of the accounts the guards fired after a rock was thrown. A man from the crowd threw a rock and struck captain Preston on the side of the head. When Preston was on the ground, he shouted “FIRE, DAMN YOU!” and a cloud of smoke and gunshots filled the air. After a couple minutes the smoke cleared and 11 people were wounded, 5 of them fatally injured. The trial was held a couple weeks after the massacre. He was acquitted of the charges by the
Crispus Attucks Do you know who Crispus Attucks is? If you don’t, then maybe you have heard of the Boston massacure. In 1775 this action took place in Boston and this man was a major part of it. He was not only a part of the Boston masacure but a start in a very important war in America. He’s life as a slave and a salesmen will have you interested in the Boston Massacure.
Paul Revere’s “The Bloody Massacre in King-Street, March 5, 1770.” is a painting of the Boston Massacre that still represents the bloody event today. However, is this depiction an observation of oppression or propaganda with a platform? The painting depicts the British Red Coats firing on the civilians of Boston as if it were a battlefield with the citizens pleading for mercy. On the contrary, according to History.com, “A squad of British soldiers, come to support a sentry who was being pressed by a heckling, snowballing crowd, let loose a volley of shots. Three persons were killed immediately and two died later of their wounds; among the victims was Crispus Attucks, a man of black or Indian parentage.”
Crispus Attucks, who was he; a patriot, a rebel rouser, a martyr? The ones who simply do not care will never know, but the ones who look closer will find an inspiring life. Known as the first casualty of the Revolution, he is honored and revered by many. We don’t know much about his childhood, being a slave, but here is what experts do know as fact.
The Boston Massacre was a very important event that happened in American history. It took place on the evening of March 5,1770. The Boston Massacre led to the American Revolution. My Monument will represent the musket that shot a black man named Crispus Attucks. Crispus Attucks was a symbol for abolitionists.
Just one small action ignited one of the most largest turn of events in American history. In the month of October 1768, a group of red suited British officers were stationed in the town of Boston, Massachusetts due to the rioting after the vessel “Liberty” was seized from trade violations (Foner 185). The British Government had been trying to increase taxes and control over the American colony. On March 5th, 1770 the colonists couldn’t take it anymore, they wanted the troops out. A mob of angry American colonists made advances on the British troops and Capt.
The Boston Massacre of the winter in March 5, 1770 was a dark time in the history of Colonial America. It was believed to be started when drunken colonist tampered, and invoked with a soldier, sharing insults, and exchanging dirty looks. The struggle quickly came out of hand as more and more colonists joined the predicament. As more colonists joined, the numbers of civilians reached the hundred. As the soldiers were outnumbered, 100:6.
The Boston Massacre occurred on March,5,1770 in King Street. It began with friction between two groups: the patriots and the British. A large collection of people threw sticks and snowball at a group of British soldiers. Captain Thomas Preston called in more soldiers to help control the riot. Those extra soldier were hit too.
The Boston Massacre is one of America’s most memorable moments in history. The Tragedy of March 5th was a leading event that soon stimulated its significance toward the American Revolution. The debate of who to blame for the occurrence of the massacre is still ongoing, and like most debates there are two different sides to the argument. Doug Linder, phenomenally explains the events that led to the massacre in his article “The Boston Massacre Trails: An Account”, in which he analyzes all facts and aspects that occurred during the trial to the point where he explores who is to blame for the horrendous event on the night of march 5th. In the article, Linder is trying to explain that through all the pain and death during that dreadful night, the
The Boston Massacre was not called ‘The Boston Massacre’ at first. The original name, was in fact the ‘State Street Massacre’. Another name they had called it was the ‘Bloody Massacre on King Street,’ and Paul Revere was the one who had originally called it the ‘Bloody Massacre on King Street.’ Paul Revere, William Dawes, and Samuel Prescott all played a major role in The Boston Massacre. Paul Revere went down in History as the one to ride his horse around the Boston and warn people the British were coming.
The choice of putting the prison guards head on a pike illustrates how the revolutionaries were using violence to make a statement. The grotesque image of a decapitated head on a pike instilled fear into those who witnessed. Even though this action was appalling in nearly every way, its savagery fulfilled a purpose, setting fear in the minds of France’s citizens, France 's government, and the monarchy. The creation of fear is a key component to gaining power and control during revolution. As illustrated by the brutality present during the storming of Bastille, physical violence functions as an aid to psychological turmoil.
In 1770, Crispus Attucks, a black man, became the first casualty of the American Revolution when he was shot and killed in what became known as the Boston Massacre. Although Attucks was credited as the leader and instigator of the event, debate raged for over as century as to whether he was a hero and a patriot, or a rabble-rousing villain. In the murder trial of the soldiers who fired the fatal shots, John Adams, serving as a lawyer for the crown, reviled the "mad behavior" of Attucks, "whose very looks was enough to terrify any person."
The rioters threw objects into the office and nobody knew what was going on. The building that the rioters took control of was the place where the drafts were taking place. The rioters attacked and took control of a government building after minutes of them being in the building. The rioters burned the office floor and the rioters blocked all exits so nobody can escape and they held everyone who was in the building as a hostage.
This is because as soon as the war was over, Britain was left with a large debt. The British thought it was only appropriate to have the colonies help pay. As a result, the British imposed taxes. The colonies were just beginning to find a slight freedom in their ruling and felt as though they were equal to Britain. These taxes imposed a monarchical tyranny and created a segregation.
The Boston Massacre was a street fight that occurred on March 5, 1770, between a “patriot”. They were throwing sticks, snowballs, and trash at a group of British troops. The loyalists got very annoyed with the patriots so they shot into the mob killing five. The riot began when around 50 colonists attacked a British sentinel. A British officer called in for additional troops
The Boston Massacre is an event most Americans and British students learn about over the course of their education. In America, we learn that British soldiers fired upon innocent civilians, although this may not have been the case. British historians have referred to the Boston Massacre as the "Incident on King Street". After looking over the "Captain Thomas Preston 's Account of the Boston Massacre", as well as "Boston Massacre Trial Depositions" I believe that American historians should refer to the "Boston Massacre" as the "Incident on King Street". The definition of a massacre refers to an unnecessary and random killing of a large number of individuals.