Death. It's a normal thing we can't run away from. Imagine having the choice to die when you want, painlessy. This is called physician assisted suicide and it threatens society by cheapening the value of human life.
Physician assisted suicide (PAS), is becoming more and more prominant around the world. A recent study shows that deaths by assisted suicide globally have increased by 200%.
Phsician assisted suicide should not be legal because of moral issues, it goes against many religious beliefs, and threatens improvement of palliative care.
Despite the fact that PAS is morally wrong, it helps people feel like they are dying with dignity. “It certainly doesn't damage family members and friends who are otherwise helpless to assist their beloved
…show more content…
“Americans are overwhelmingly in favor of PAS. In fact, a Gallup poll from May 2015 found that "nearly seven in ten Americans (68%) say doctors should be legally allowed to assist terminally ill patients in committing suicide” (Beckman).
PAS gives people the option to die with dignity and make it easier for the family to process. Not only are the families supporting it, over half of the U.S population also supports it
PAS does have some pros, but it also comes with many cons. In order to have an opinion we need to know and understand both sides and points of view.
PAS is non-faithful. When asking Physicians what their thoughts are on PAS, some of them do not support it. In the following quote by Dr. Susmasy, he highlights that PAS is unethical. “I am a physician. Part of my job is to help people die in comfort and with dignity. But I do not want to help you, or your daughter, or your uncle commit suicide. You should not want me to. I urge you to oppose physician-assisted suicide: it rep-resents bad ethical reasoning, bad medicine, and bad policy” (Susmasy
…show more content…
Patients that have never thought of PAS are now given the inhumane way to die. Author Hendin elaborates, “There is compelling evidence that legalizing assisted suicide undermines efforts to maintain and improve good care for patients nearing the end of life, including patients who never wanted assisted suicide” (Hendin).
When you know your time is coming, typically dying gracefully and “normally” is the way most people want to go. Patients who never intended to get PAS, are now given the option to die irregularly.
Similarly, cancer patients for example, would try to fight for their life. Now given the option to do otherwise, they might pick to just give up. “If physician-assisted suicide or euthanasia, or both, were to become part of the provision of palliative care, many more people would likely decide to forgo palliative care” (Herx) Patients might take the easy route, and choose to stop living life. Life is very valuable. Whether you're sick or not. Many peoples lives have been taken too soon and you shouldn't just stop living life.
Should PAS be legalized? No, PAS should not be
The concept and ideology behind Physician-Assisted Suicide within the contemporary generation has become an exceptionally sensitive and controversial issue as multiple factors conglomerate to define if Physician-Assisted Suicide is justifiable within the grounds of ethical understanding and moral principles. The idea concerning PAS is based on the grounds of rational and irrational thinking as in if death is a rational choice above all other alternatives (Wittwer 420).
By allowing the option of physician assisted suicide, the state may be softening the idea that there is no hope for someone that ill, and that sends the wrong message to the public. Just as well, the Death With Dignity legislation may compromise the view that people have on doctors as healers (Plaisted 205). Patients may lose trust in them if they condoned, or even participated in physician assisted suicide. Those who are against PAS feel that there should not be a loss of hope for someone suffering from an incurable disease, and are against my argument
Chuc Tran T. Hollis-GInes ENG 101- Argumentative 23 October 2015 Physician-assisted Suicide The legalization of physician-assisted suicide has became an increasingly debatable topic in the United States today. The practice of assisted suicide pertains to a terminally ill patient who wants to end his or her life along with a physician’s acknowledgement of that patient’s desire to die.
It provides a competent patient with a prescription medication to use with the primary intention of ending his or her own life. Physician-assisted suicide has its proponents and its opponents. This procedure is not to be taken lightly. All patients pursuing PAS should be evaluated. It is required that “...a patient's request for assistance with a hastened death should generate a thorough evaluation of the patient's motives and attempts at ameliorating the patient's suffering”(NCBI).
According to Karaim in 2013 “Decisions about sustaining life, allowing it to end or even hastening death are among the most difficult choices terminally ill patients and their families can face” (para 1). Patients going through this have a bountiful number of things going
I am concerned about physician assisted suicide. I do not believe that suicide is the answer, no matter the situation. I am against assisted suicide because I believe it is unethical to be allowed to choose to die. I think that assisted suicide should not be allowed. I also do not understand how a doctor or nurse could help a patient commit suicide.
Dyck’s book, “Life’s Worth: The Case against Assisted Suicide,” details why PAS is unethical. One of Dyck’s first arguments comes from a story in which a patient, who initially requested PAS but later found enjoyment in other things and turned away from PAS. His argument stands in which he says that patient’s wishes can change and that when they find happiness and solace in other things they will understand that PAS is not the way to go (Dyck, 14-15). Dyck also explores the concept of how PAS is not as effective as comfort-only care.
There are countless stories of those who get declined for this who end up committing suicide in a less dignified manner. Most of those who ask for PAS just want to end their pain and suffering surrounded by loved ones in a dignified manner. I have read several stories where due to the decline of PAS, they choose to go out by shooting themselves, or suffocating themselves, ect,. Doctors rolls are seen as being healers, but, that roll should be switched to relievers if there is no option of healing.
Assisted Suicide: A Controversial Topic Assisted suicide, also known as physician-assisted death (PAD), has been a topic of controversy for decades. While some argue that PAD should be legalized to grant terminally ill patients the right to die with dignity, others believe it goes against the sanctity of life. This essay will explore the arguments for and against assisted suicide and offer recommendations on how to approach the issue. PAD is Important
The recent legislative advancements concerning physician-assisted suicide have unveiled a series of controversial arguments regarding the right to die. As told by The Gale Encyclopedia of Public Health, “Assisted Suicide is a form of self-inflicted death in which individuals voluntarily bring about their own death with the help of another, usually a physician, relative, or friend. Assisted suicide is sometimes called physician-assisted death or PAD” (Frey 915). Four U.S. states now have legalized the practice of assisted suicide and other countries across the world are successfully making headway in their push for physician-assisted suicide.
The National Public Radio (NPR) once said and states, “Advocates of assisted-suicide laws believe that mentally competent people who are suffering and have no chance of long-term survival, should have the right to die if and when they choose. If people have the right to refuse life-saving treatments, they argue, they should also have the freedom to choose to end their own lives” (NPR Staff). As a patient’s pain grows increasingly worse, their only option is to adopt physician-assisted suicide. If there is no cure or chance of
“Legislation that allows people to end their lives automatically creates incentives to seek death as a cost-saving option. The elderly and infirm are seen as burdens and can easily be disposed of. Suicide becomes the easy way out.” (Ben Broussard) Most of the time physicians are against the idea of physician assisted suicide because it goes against their job description and personal beliefs.
Physician Assisted Suicide (PAS) is where a physician helps out critical condition patients who want to end their lives. This work is disputable, with people arguing that it provides patients another option to end their suffering. Although people who oppose Physician Assisted Suicide say it shortens human lives, it should be legalized since it helps people end their lives easily and effectively. Opponents of physician-assisted suicide insist it contravenes the Hippocratic Oath, which forbids doctors to damage or permit harm to their patients.
Patients have the right to the kind of treatment they want. 3) Conclusion a) Physician assisted suicide can help treat the terminally ill how they would like to be treated. b) The long history of assisted suicide speaks for itself in the matter of if it should be legal or
The medical field is filled with opportunities and procedures that are used to help improve a patient’s standard of living and allow them to be as comfortable as possible. Physician assisted suicide (PAS) is a method, if permitted by the government, that can be employed by physicians across the world as a way to ease a patient’s pain and suffering when all else fails. PAS is, “The voluntary termination of one's own life by administration of a lethal substance with the direct or indirect assistance of a physician.”-Medicinenet.com. This procedure would be the patient’s decision and would allow the patient to end their lives in a more peaceful and comfortable way, rather than suffering until the illness takes over completely. Physician assisted suicide should be permitted by the government because it allows patients to end their suffering and to pass with dignity, save their families and the hospital money, and it allows doctors to preserve vital organs to save