The Murder Of Steve Harmen In Monster By Walter Dean Myers

There was a lack of evidence to convict Steve guilty. Others have shown Steve's lack of guilt through their actions. On the night of the robbery and murder, there was no proven statement Steve was at the convenience store. He was caught up with the wrong people at the wrong time.

Monster by Walter Dean Myers, the author tells a story in the first person names steve. Steve was being accused of being the lookout and killing a man for the during a robbery. Steve was the lookout but wasn’t responsible for the murder of Mr. Nesbitt. Steve was the lookout during the robbery. One reason Steve the lookout was because BOBO identifies him in the court.

This is proved when Mr. Sawicki testifies. In the novel Mr. Sawicki testifies stating, “‘He’s very much involved with depicting his neighborhood and environment in a positive manner.’” (Myers 235). Throughout the novel there weren't a lot of people that testified about Steve. In fact, there were probably only three people.

Just because they are guilty doesn't mean they can't be a Monster. In the book Monster by Walter Dean Myers, Steve Harmon, a 16 year old, is on trial for felony murder. Based on the evidence given, Steve Harmon is not guilty as shown through testimonies, journals and flashbacks. During Steve's trial, Lorelle Henry, the librarian, testifies and proves Steve Harmons innocence. She testified that King was in Nesbitts Drug Store

Steve Harmon is a kid who is on trial for being a part of a robbery and murder. He lives in Harlem; New York and he is also only 16 years old. In the novel, Monster, by Walter Dean Myers, Steve Harmon was a monster because he lied and he doubts himself. Steve was a monster because he lied to the jury and said that he wasn’t in the store that day. Steve is in jail waiting on his trial for robbery and murder.

The Zodiac was once a mixed psychopathic serial killer. He tormented the San Francisco Bay area through several random violent killings in the 1960's and 70's while never been caught either. The Zodiac killer also taunted the police force, with cryptograms and phone calls informing them of recent killings. The police have investigated and interviewed thousands of suspects. The police still get many tips every year about the true identity of the Zodiac killer.

Although you might wonder why I mentioned the money saying he might have participated, the main reason they committed the crime was for money. So why did Steve not get paid? I am writing this essay to prove that Steve correctly proved his innocence to the judge and juries. The first major evidence is that Lorelle Henry did not witness Steve in the store while she was there.

In the novel, Monster, by Walter Dean Myers, 16- year- old Steve Harmon is placed on trial for felony murder. Steve tries to prove his innocence to the jury and he is found not guilty. Therefore, he is acquitted of any crime. However, Steve’s contradicting thoughts make the reader question his innocence.

Monster - Walter Dean Myers How would one feel to be on trail for something they did not do? In monster, by Walter Dean Myers, Steve Harmon is on trial for murder. Steve Harmon is a 16 year old who is wrongly accused of a crime he did not commit. If found guilty he can potentially serve 25 years to life in prison. He faces prejudice during his court case when there should only be hard cold facts.

The Innocent Killer Imagine a fragile, lonely woman who emerges as a brave, worthy adversary to Atticus. Mayella Ewell is an extremely polarizing figure in to To Kill A Mockingbird. She is the daughter of Bob Ewell, an unemployed man, who is widely looked down upon by his fellow peers.

Steve’s judgment of his actions is similar to a pendulum swinging. Although Steve believes within himself that he is innocent, of the important people around him, make him insecure as to the degree of his innocence and turn to others for confirmation. Steve Harmon, the defendant, is faced with an internal conflict that questions his self-identity and his character in relation to the crime.

First off who is this Albert fish guy? Well, Albert fish was a serial killer whose killing spree spiked in the 20s. He was a cannibalistic serial killer which means that he also ate people. So let's start in the beginning Albert fish was born

The court system, the only thing keeping Steve from his parents, his brother, it will be the deciding factor if whether Steve goes to or stays out of Jail in the novel Monster written by Walter Dean Myers. Steve Harmon is a 16 year old boy that we get to learn about through the numerous journal entries and his script of his journey throughout jail and court. He is suspected in court for being an alleged suspect along with James King. Throughout the book we learn about the inside of Harmon and what he tells us about what he did, and where he was during the crime but we never get to know the truth about it he really committed the crime which proves the theme. Ones true actions can never be revealed.

Throughout the entire case, there was not enough evidence given for the jury to prove him guilty. Lorelle Henry was a person that witnessed part of the crime, and even said she never saw Steve in the store. With all of the evidence given, there was not enough for Steve to be found guilty and not be a good person. However, just because Steve was found not guilty doesn’t mean he was innocent. Therefore, Steve was a monster.

The whole jury said he is not guilty. People also said that Steve had done nothing wrong; they believed he had nothing to do with it. However, just because he was found not guilty doesn't mean Steve was innocent. Therefore, Steve was a monster. Steve was a monster because he was friends with bad people.