The Ethicality Of Arizona Immigration Law

This law helps prevent us from bringing in more illegal immigrants. With that being said, I agree with Phil Bryant’s Position on Illegal Immigration in

In 2010, Arizona S.B. 1070 was an anti-illegal immigration law that was passed to focus on identifying, prosecuting, and deporting undocumented immigrants. Arizona’s law enforcement officials could detain anyone who was suspected of living in the country illegally. The law also made it a state misdemeanor crime to for an alien to not carry registration papers and people in the country illegally to solicit work. But, Arizona S.B. 1070 was charged with violating the federal Supremacy Clause by enacting its own immigration enforcement laws instead of following federal regulations; violating the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment by denying minorities their equal protection of the laws; violating the 1st Amendment by scrutinizing minorities

The Puente Movement and Larkin & Lacey Frontera Fund Civil and Migrant Rights Crusades Arizona is home to many civil, human and migrant rights groups and advocates. The Phoenix based Puente Movement is one such organization. The movement advocates for migrant justice by empowering and educating communities to enable them defend their families and enhance their quality of life. The organization’s operating framework is built on the foundation of “Closed Fist, Open Hand strategy”. The Closed Fist strategy infers to fighting enforcement actions that criminalize people, though racial profiling, detention, Police-ICE collaboration and deportation.

The American Civil Liberty Union, since the second provision of the law took effect, received hundreds of calls about the possible rights violation related to the provision, hence the reported victims reveal that they (U.S. citizens and permanent residents) were subjected to racial profiling and unlawful detention by law enforcement (Wessler, 2013). The bill is a violation of the United States’ 4th Amendment that protects people against unreasonable searches and seizure. The policy grant law enforcement the authority to detain people through subjective judgement, therefore, police officers can harass and discriminate against those whose visually appear to be Mexican or Hispanic, regardless of the person’s immigration status or

Richard Seng Professor Franks AAS 33B May 1, 2016 California Propositions The three of the propositions that were passed in the 1990s were targeted towards the minority groups in California. Proposition 187 denied illegal immigrants from accessing public services, Proposition 209 which prohibited special treat towards a person due to their race and gender in public institutions, and Proposition 227 which changed the way that non-English speaking students were taught in public schools. These policies were legalized by voters, in order to alienate illegal immigrants and non-English speaking groups, so they can either fit in the American society, or just try and drive them out of the state completely. These ideological trends and anti-immigrant campaigns were designed by the right-wing Americans and the Republicans in the state of California, in the hopes of reducing the amount of immigrants in California.

Dr. Barsha Pickell, The Arizona and the united states have similarities regarding the rights of individuals and term guidelines in how long a public official can stay in office. There is also accountability between each part of the government in each state. Moreover, regulations that citizens should adhere to regarding policies between the state and federal governments. The Arizona and United State constitution is similar by reason of gives the public right ahead of assimilate a decent life.

Municipalities do not have the right or jurisdiction to make decisions on immigration issues. Street-level bureaucrats must adhere to federal law. Currently there is no punishment or adverse consequences for cities that ignore this policy. Illegal immigration is an issue that has national and local effects, especially for a border city like San Diego. Representative Duncan Hunter (R-El Cajon) proposed H.R. 3009 – Enforce the Law for Sanctuary Cities Act.

Many do not understand the stringency attached to this subject nonetheless it does not change the fact that this law had adverse outcomes. Hence, the citizens of the United States should not be lab rats for the government to observe, and the charter that was set up by our founding fathers should not be tempted even if it is seen as

Annotated Bibliography Beadle, Amanda Peterson. " Top 10 Reasons Why The U.S. Needs Comprehensive Immigration Reform." ThinkProgress. © 2016 - Center for American Progress, 10 Dec. 2012.

According to Lee and Dong (2012), in April 2010, the Arizona State Legislature enacted the Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act (“S.B. 1070”), which establishes or amends state immigration offenses and defines local police officers’ immigration law enforcement authority where Section 1 of S.B. 1070 states that the Arizona legislature’s goal in enacting this statute was to deter illegal immigrants from entering the country and from engaging in economic activity (Retrieved from https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/11-182). Although the State of Arizona is frustrated with the problem with illegal aliens, it cannot take the matter over their own hands without going through the United States Supreme Court Decision to make it equal for all states not just one.

The government received rewards when they ruled that the person that was detained was a run away slave which led to many free black being faulsy accused and sold into bondage. Under the SB 1070 any citizen who gives a ride to an undocumented immigrant would be fined 1,000 dollars. It can be expected that many Latino’s would be shunned to because people would fear that they were undoumented. Finacial motivation also exist in SB 1070 because anti-immigrants citizens can sue official who do not enforce the new immigration law against the suspected alines. Since the official do not want to pay fines and attorney fees many Latino will be harrassed with arrests and be abused regarles of their legal status because they fear that they will be trargeted for litigation if they don’t take

Measures range from treating schools, courthouses and hospitals as “safe zones” to restricting the ability of local police to detain people on behalf of federal immigration. The law does nothing to curtail the ability of federal agents to come into the state and deport people or carry out raids, but it does make such actions more difficult for agencies with limited resources (Steinmetz,

This program was introduced by President Barack Obama in 2012 and was aimed at protecting people who were brought to the United States under the age of 16 from deportation. The program required applicants to be in or have graduated high school, to have no criminal record, and other requirements. It provided applicants who were eligible with a two-year, renewable permit, and although it granted work authorization, it did not grant legal status. Approximately 800,000 DACA recipients, also referred to as “Dreamers,” are currently being protected by the program. However, on September 5, 2017, the Trump administration announced that it would end DACA, declaring the executive order that created it unconstitutional.

Obama’s Immigration Policy: Presidential Memos to order Deferred Action Within the last few years, immigration has been a huge topic for debate. Americans have seen a large increase in the numbers of immigrants, specifically illegal immigrants, over the last few decades. That has many citizens wondering what has changed. One of the most recent changes has to do with an executive policy known as deferred action.

Undocumented immigrants live with fear of deportation every day of their lives. Those with control of state institutions who do not consider undocumented immigrants as worthy American residents in our society, take advantage of their power by instilling fear of deportation. The restrictive federal and state laws towards migration in the U.S. has become a way to keep undocumented immigrants and their families living in the shadows. Arrocha (2013) claims that the paradox of the U.S. migration seems be that our free democratic republicanism is viewed as the land of freedom, equality, and justice. Yet, these undocumented immigrants aren’t treated equally or given the freedom to live in our society without intimidation.